Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be "Shall"? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall, since it has been made quite clear that the
majority of people want a binding list. The work you did on Harmony:
We treated the Initial Committer list as an indication of interest, and
just looked for people that followed through once the project got started.
would have to be done PRIOR to the vote.
How? How do you see if the people actually engaged in the community
until after it got formed and working?
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
