Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there are opportunities where we can
explore alternatives to our conventional process. For example, working
in interaction between the podling and the greater incubator community,
and doing it on "home turf" for the podling.
I keep thinking of something I believe Roy said when we first were
getting community incubation and PPMCs formalized - when a community
gets organized enough to vote itself out of the Incubator, it's appropriate.
After I send this message, I'm going to send a message on harmony-dev,
asking for a vote on graduation. I'm encouraging both the full harmony
community, and the full incubator community to vote.
I'm not trying hold a vote "elsewhere" - this can only happen if there
is a binding vote by the Incubator - it just means you vote "over there"
rather than "over here".
I'm looking for consensus here - I'm not interested in squeaking by,
ramming through, sneaking past, running around, skipping over, digging
under... (I ran out of prepositions...).
If you think that Harmony should graduate, please vote +1. If you don't
think so, please vote -1 and say why so we can fix it. If you have no
opinion, please vote 0. Knowing the interest and oversight level is
important.
The timing is suboptimal, because of the upcoming colo move and
consequent mail disruption, and it's a weekend, but given the interest
level in the subject, I see nothing to lose. The vote will go on for 72
hours + mail outage time.
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
