understand that for TLP a sponsor must be either
Incubator PMC or the ASF Board. I am asking for advice on how we can
go about that.
Thanks
Andrus
--
Andrei (aka Andrus) Adamchik
Cayenne Persistence Framework
Lead Architect
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne
to OJB...
Yoav
On 2/25/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
We at Cayenne project (http://objectstyle.org/cayenne) would like to
join Apache. We wrote a proposal draft that can be viewed here:
http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/ASF+Proposal
Brian McCallister v
We have the vibrant community part covered already, so now we are
asking for incubation :-)
Andrus
On Feb 26, 2006, at 12:02 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/2/25, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I understand that for TLP a sponsor must be either
Incubator PMC or the ASF
y who helped us to start the proposal
process and is doing a lot already to move it ahead is willing to be
a mentor. But can he? And if currently the answer is no, why not?
Andrus
On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:04:15PM +0300, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Thanks for the proposal. It's best to submit the proposal
itself to the list, and provide a URL as backup, but
that's no problem.
Yeah, I overlooked this requirement. Leo screen-scraped the text from
Wiki and sent it to this list alre
s.
* Core Developers: Andrus Adamchik (founder), Cris Daniluk,
Michael Gentry, Tore Halset, Mike Kienenberger, Kevin Menard, Eric
Schneider
* Alignment: We propose Cayenne as a TLP within the ASF,
sponsored by the Incubator TLP.
* License: Cayenne is currently licensed under the Apach
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No n
, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
Mhm, why is the Incubator PMC now the sponsor instead of t
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/2/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
Not AFAIK. I for one would be in favor of having t
rrent
developments. But I think we can proceed with the DB PMC vote.
Andrus
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This (and what Jim said a few minutes ago) is consistent with my
understanding of the current situation. I just made cha
Geir,
I don't think there is any contradiction between your post and what
Mike was saying. If you look at the thread context, we are still
talking about how to move with the incubation sponsorship.
More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
Incubator PMC vote. As
Thank you Tom, Brian, Jean and the DB PMC! This is very exciting news
to us.
So should we formally start the incubator acceptance vote on this
list, or is this also something that is done privately between the
Incubator PMC members?
Andrus
On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:04 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrot
On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andrus, since Jim and I aren't reflected in the posted version of your
proposal, it might be more manageable to put your proposal at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ . That'll make it easier to make any
other changes the Incubator might like
So let's go ahead. Looks like the Champion requirement is indeed
optional, and we have all other roles covered now. Can someone start
the Incubator PMC vote on Cayenne acceptance?
Andrus
On Mar 7, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Perfect!
On Mar 6, 2006, at 3:06 PM, A
we should clear it up
in or docs, but the way I think of it is that there's an Apache
Member or Officer who thinks it's a good idea for the project to
come here. Seems like a good idea to have one.
geir
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
So let's go ahead. Looks like the Champion require
That's what I was kind of doing with this message. Waiting for reply
now :-)
On Mar 8, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/8/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian and Jim are our mentors, so we have support of two Apache
officers. Nobody officially
On Mar 8, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
* [still in the early stages] JPA implementation (JSR-220)
Are you aware of the Open JPA proposal, also looking for
incubation? Is
this something where perhaps you might want to adopt theirs, since
yours is
still early?
See: http://wi
Hi Bertrand,
OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the resource
file will make it very useful immediately.
Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml was clearly open source, and
I am going to cast a positive vote to accept it in DeviceMap, I am fairly
cert
, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> Hi Bertrand,
>>
>> OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the
>> resource file will make it very useful immediately.
>>
>> Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml was
, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> Hi Bertrand,
>>
>> OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the
>> resource file will make it very useful immediately.
>>
>> Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml
+1
Looking forward to actually using Syncope soon.
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> a big +1 !
>
> Excellent work, guys !
>
> Le 11/2/12 10:00 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>> this is a call for vote to graduate the Syncope podling from Apache
>> Incubat
+1
>> On Dec 2, 2012 6:51 AM, "seba.wag...@gmail.com"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Incubation members,
>>>
>>> During incubation, OpenMeetings has :
>>> * Produced 1 Release
>>> * Added 5 new Committer/PPMC members and shows constant community
>>> activities
>>> * Cleared IP on all code
>>> * Develop
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I am so happy that after all considerations and suggestions that were
>> floated in the Wave community, you guys picked Apache as the place to
>> develop Wave community and WIAB. G
On Nov 26, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> I wouldn't stop the proposal, though. This can be identified as an
> issue to be solved in Incubation - either by changing the name away
> from 'Wave' or by transferring marks or even by determining that none
> of both is required.
Exactly,
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote:
>
> [X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additi
Actually those were there before I started the process of gathering committer
ids. None of the last week CLAs are recorded yet.
Andrus
On Dec 13, 2010, at 2:09 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
>>
>> At the same time, folks that don't have ICLAs recorded yet should send
>> them in.
I can't see why not forwarding it to Incubator PMC would hold root@ from
creating the accounts (I mean, if it is such a big deal, root@ can always
forward this message themselves and/or contact me to do it). Anyways, I just
forwarded the original request.
BTW, the original request was sent to r
t. This is fixed now, and we can proceed
with this account. Also I noticed that I had a typo in email address in my
original account request, so here is the correct info on this account:
purserj, jpurser: James Purser, jamesrpur...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Andrus
On Dec 16, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Andru
On Jan 2, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Hi root,
Sorry meant to send it to priv...@i.a.o, not general.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gene
Per Feb 2 message from Upayavira on wave-dev
(1296637259.12852.1418516...@webmail.messagingengine.com), SVN auth grants are
setup for all Wave committers. Not sure if the permissions are extended to the
Incubator site?
Andrus
On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> David,
>
>
+1 (binding)
I have similar concerns as Niclas and a few other folks here, and estimate the
risk of failure of this very visible podling as too high. I wasn't sure about
my vote till the last moment. But in the current situation I don't see an
alternative to ASF taking it and trying to do our b
Hi Erich,
There are no formal limitations on what an Apache software can do. While there
is some historical bias towards certain types of projects and technologies
here, it is not set in stone or anything. The area of use can be as broad or as
specific as its creators decide. The only practical
I've been in touch with Sebastian and Alexei and I am willing to champion the
proposal. Just added myself to the corresponding section on the Wiki. I think
we may still need to refine / update the proposal a bit before we can start the
vote. But IMO we are very close to this point. The technolog
edehausen
Will Glass-Husain
Andrus Adamchik
The proposed board resolution is included below.
Kind regards
Bob
[1]: http://markmail.org/thread/nhhocnq3xufm3lkt
[2]: http://markmail.org/message/pwgo2duk6oens7v6
--- Begin Proposed Board Resolution ---
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems
Hi Greg,
I am not on either side of the debate here, but Martijn is correct in
pointing that the formal standard was applied to *all* podlings to
date. There's more than a few projects in the ASF that were originally
developed in the open, with strong communities. And in those cases
that
On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I mean, really... how many other projects that are 9.5 years old(*) do
we expect to see arriving here? And of those, how many *started* with
the ideas and precepts of the Apache Software Foundation? I suspect it
will be zero, so wasting a lot of tim
If you are going to do a rewrite, yet another option is to use Apache
Cayenne, which has all the features of a modern ORM (plus a few more)
and is also rather friendly to beginners:
http://cayenne.apache.org/
Then maybe we can collaborate with OpenMeetings to make sure Cayenne
works on Goo
No. We froze the JPA compatibility effort started some time ago.
Cayenne uses its own persistence API.
Cheers,
Andrus
On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:08 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 11/19/2009 05:49 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
If you are going to do a rewrite, yet another option is to use Apache
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a "bz2" archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
Just curious why you think this is a blocker? Each project knows
better what formats are co
Many projects are using cwiki.apache.org/confluence to maintain
documentation. Confluence has version tracking with visual diff
display. Probably also possible to setup an RSS feed to watch the
pages that changed. So that should be all you need.
Andrus
On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Miles Li
Congrats to Subversion. Glad to see you guys here.
Ah, the good memories of the day when I discovered SVN and source
control stopped being a pain. Keep up the good work!
Andrus
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
The ASF Board just voted to approve the graduation of Sub
While I second that in general, and I have argued (unsuccessfully) on
the incubator list against arbitrary size constraints for graduating
podlings, still in theory a PMC min size comes from the need to have a
sustainable quorum to vote on releases. If it can get at least 3
people to vote,
+1
I am so happy that after all considerations and suggestions that were floated
in the Wave community, you guys picked Apache as the place to develop Wave
community and WIAB. Good luck and let me know if you need extra mentors (you
already have 4, so I figured you are covered and didn't add m
te is open for 72 hours.
Andrus
---
Andrus Adamchik
Apache Cayenne ORM: http://cayenne.apache.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/andrus_a
---
== OpenMeetings Project Proposal ==
== Abstract ==
Openmeetings is a web conferencing solution.
== Proposal ==
Openmeetings provides
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incuba
vanum Srinivas +1
Ate Douma +1
Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1
Deepal Jayasinghe +1
Andrus Adamchik +1
Yegor Kozlov +1
Olivier Lamy +1
Mohammad Nour El-Din +1
Alan D. Cabrera +1
Jim Jagielski +1
[Wider community]
Francis De Brabandere +1
Raffaele P. Guidi +1
Kalle Korhonen +1
Alexei Fedotov +1
Daniel Haisc
Big +1.
With WURFL demise and disgraceful behavior of its founders, we certainly need a
truly open source alternative.
So what is the origin of OpenDDR database and how does it compare to WURFL?
Cheers,
Andrus
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> T
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Note that the proposal mentions OpenDDR donating their *source code*
> only - as mentioned in the proposal, the "details" of the repository
> data will be discussed once the podling starts.
The repository is the most valuable piece here.
understand.
Andrus
On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>>> Note that the proposal mentions OpenDDR donating
Thanks. That answers it actually :-)
On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> The question is essentially about any existing assets the project is
>> planning to bring to Apache. While any
+1
On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC members (*),
>
> I've just reviewed the "[PROPOSAL] Apache DeviceMap..." thread and I
> think all relevant issues have been adressed now.
>
> Let's cast your votes to accept DeviceMap as an incubating project,
> propo
On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
> If this VOTE isn't successful, then he'll remain the chair. If
> you want to explicitly call a VOTE for Noel, go ahead, but
> this is the VOTE I am int
With Noel's email, this vote makes sense now.
+1 to Jukka (binding)
Cheers,
Andrus
On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
> chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including m
Hi Alexei,
I am listed as a mentor in error at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openmeetings.html . I was the champion on
the proposal. But even though I like the project, I knew I wouldn't be able to
lead you through incubator and give all needed attention due to other
commitments. So I i
-
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> Hi Alexei,
>>
>> I am listed as a mentor in error at
>> ht
+1 (binding)
I notice you've done lots of ASF compliance-related work recently, going
through 4 release candidates. Really appreciate your patience and resolve to
get things right. Using Rat and scanning through the distro I couldn't find any
new holes in the current iteration. Also just notice
Hi there,
I have a few high level technical questions about the scope of the
system. I am just trying to understand what it is.
* There is a quote 'BSDCS [...] changes the model from the
"conference" to "collaboration"'. So is that video conferencing
software that also allows playback of
x, CWPlayer for Win32) and MMA capable
recorder.
In this document(url is below) , there is also screenshot of our
players:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dcj48f88_09k567f
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hi there,
I have a few high level technical questions about the scope of the
system. I am
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So, any advice on this matter?...
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apac
On Sep 24, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Speaking just for myself, I find the name unusual but not offensive
or even provocative. The fact that you wouldn't eat an animal
doesn't mean you deny its existence...
+1
I find it a fun name, and the one unlikely to infringe on the
exi
today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
and the only results
that I got was this:
Not like the list you've quoted indicates scarcity in the XMPP server
space ;-)
Does anyone (besides me) think that we can build something better?
As always having an Apache-lic
+1
I have no explanation why the social networks are experiencing such
growth these days, but it is certainly another fun area for
developers :-)
Andrus
Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop the container and backend server components
for hosting O
On Jan 4, 2008, at 6:15 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008 11:22, Bozhong Lin wrote:
If Apache could help this first Chinese-initiated project
into incubation, this will stimulate lot of enthusiasms in talented
Chinese developer community and many great Chinese-initiated
pr
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:27 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[x] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation
Andrus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:47 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 2/4/08, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As long as you remember that you can't release or graduate
without properly
audited code with a paper trail to the original author of the code.
You can release from the incubator before all IP
On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
And to be quite frank, it feels very counterproductive to me to
remove
code from the project with full a priori intention of putting it back
in.
Are you sure you will get the appropriate ICLA's from all the
authors that
have contribu
Also even if some other proposals got canned, this doesn't this one
won't get accepted. The best thing to do is to submit a proposal
following one of the existing templates and let the people on this
list comment on it, and see if you can find mentors here.
Andrus
On Apr 14, 2008, at 5:21
Hi Dims,
This looks good, so let me comment specifically on things that IMO
need clarification.
On May 5, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
#2: Create and maintain a charter that governs the PMC/project(s)
That's probably obsolete. I recall seeing some TLP's having a charter,
bu
On May 6, 2008, at 7:42 PM, Roland Weber wrote:
I believe that "bylaws" are required. At least the creation of
bylaws is mentioned in the TLP resolutions I have read last year.
I think that's obsolete. Cayenne graduated 1.5 years ago and has no
bylaws.
Of course I've also seen both terms
Hi Alexis,
I think it would really help if you started developing in the open
using one of the free open source sites. This would provide the
project history to a potential Champion, including access to the
source code and general feel of whether you are really interested in
building comm
reflection
API or the
XML files (orm.xml).
Do you understand the goal of JEUT?
2008/5/15, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Alexis,
I think it would really help if you started developing in the open
using
one of the free open source sites. This would provide the project
histor
create a
test
class that extends a specific JEUT test class and all the work
is done
for
you. The framework uses the annotations discovered via
reflection API
or
the
XML files (orm.xml).
Do you understand the goal of JEUT?
2008/5/15, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Alexis
eally interested by the persistence layer.
It would
be a great pleasure to work on the Cayenne project. If you desire,
we can
speak about that by private email. Contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/5/16 Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
BTW, if that turns to be the case, yo
+1.
In a crowded web frameworks space, I very much like Click's philosophy
of trading off deeper abstractions for simplicity. Last time I used
it, the impression was "nice and clean". Haven't used it lately
(except for maintaining older projects). I hope it preserved that
simplicity as th
Hi Jim,
It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit regarding
ASF policies, but values the "Apache brand" enough to tow the
line.
Did you mean Maven as "Maven repo deployed @Apache" or "Maven the
PMC"? As Noel was talking specifically about the PMC. We can certainly
ban Maven
rus
On Jul 11, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hi Jim,
It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit regarding
ASF policies, but values the "Apache brand" enough to tow the
line.
Did you mean Maven as "Mav
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
but I don't think ASF policies apply to the architecture decisions
(good or bad) and development direction of any given project.
They don't. Sorry if that wasn't clear :)
Yep. That's where I was getting. You can ignore my last message the
itial Committers ==
The initial committers for the project should include:
* Malcolm Edgar
* Bob Schellink
* Naoki Takezoe
* Ahmed Mohombe
* Henning Schmiedehausen
* Will Glass-Husain
* Ted Husted
* Andrus Adamchik
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Henning Schmiedeh
On Jul 18, 2008, at 8:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
There are no "project leads" at the ASF. All committers who become
a member
of the PMC shall have an equal say in the project. This can cause a
great
amount of friction when the project is perceived to be "owned" by a
small
subset
On Jul 21, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Note: Andrus and Will have requested to join the Incubator PMC but
were
no IPMC members at the time when they voted.
I can vote one more time with my IPMC member hat on ;-) Not that we
don't have enough votes.
Andrus
Hi Malcolm,
Is there existing code in Click written by Ahmed? As getting an ICLA
or rewriting this code will be required as a part of the IP clearance
process. The ideal outcome would be for Ahmed to send an ICLA,
regardless of his future participation plans, but that's of course up
to hi
. But when I wrote a few Cayenne DB adapters
that had been written by other people before, I am pretty sure I
didn't steal anyone's original work.
Andrus
On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 27, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Is there existing code
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
contributor) contributed that code to a project that is already under
AL2. So there is no need to track down the contributors and/or rewrite
code where the contributor can no
mes out. After all,
that
is where the lawyers lurk.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 10:42 -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
My personal understanding here is, that Ahmed (and any other
contributor) contribute
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
- The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF
release. Is this OK ?
I don't see
Hi JB,
A very interesting problem you are addressing with AutoDeploy. JEE
deployment tools that I've seen to date don't scale too well, so this
area can use lots of improvement. I've developed a similar system for
a big site of one of our customers, with the main goal to manage a mid-
size
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Currently, there is not a lot of documentation (I need to produce
one) but,
anyway, quickly :), the deployment flow is :
Step 0 : init VFS file manipulator
...
So does it have some cluster deploy strategy (e.g. minimizing downtime
ocess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
On Thu 18/12/08 11:38, "Andrus Adamchik" and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Currently, there is not a lot of documentation (I
need to produce
one) but,
anyway,
Yeah, I am curious how practical it is to use Puppet to deploy JEE
apps? Maybe for managing the server config files, but the actual app
deployment???
(sorry, that's getting a bit OT, but I think this discussion is still
useful in mapping the AutoDeploy problem domain, and hence explaining
On Dec 24, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
What have happened to previous tradition of coming up with good
obscure names??
SpretFlinter (zero hits)
Crentacto (one hit)
Bristasse (116 hits)
Not to make JB's job any harder, but IMO these examples are just
silly. BTW, what traditio
Hi JB,
Procedural things can get really slow here at times due to the
volunteer nature of the ASF. Don't get discouraged by that...
For now you'll need to ping people to look at the proposal, and find
two more mentors. I'd love to be one of them, but I am afraid I will
be AWOL most of the
)
and no other votes:
Andrus Adamchik +1
Bob Schellink +1
Naoki Takezoe +1
Malcolm Edgar +1
Ricardo Lecheta +1
Vote thread:
http://click.markmail.org/search/#query:+page:1+mid:3t5lfsusnizffj4t+state:results
Distribution can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~sabob/click/click/2.0
+1.
On Feb 4, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Bob Schellink wrote:
New snapshots are available and contains the incubation disclaimer.
Thanks to Kevan for picking this up.
The disclaimer can be found in the distribution root while for maven
artifacts the disclaimer can be found under META-INF.
New dist
replaced.
We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for
this release.
The vote on the click-dev mailing list resulted in 5 +1 votes (4
binding) and no other votes:
Andrus Adamchik +1
Bob Schellink +1
Naoki Takezoe +1
Malcolm Edgar +1
Ricardo Lecheta +1
Vote thread
On Feb 11, 2009, at 1:00 AM, Bob Schellink wrote:
Can we get fired for trying to release so many times?
Hehe , no :-)
Thanks Henning for catching those things.
Andrus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubato
+1
On Feb 10, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Bob Schellink wrote:
New snapshots are available with the following changes:
# build.properties has new property to switch off the hibernate
dependency
# build.xml will only build the hibernate package if hibernate is
available on the build path
# The Co
Interesting. This is the first time I see a high-level Java design
that is a diversion from DB independence. So how much performance
improvement do you see by nixing JDBC?
Andrus
On Mar 19, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I'm working (day job!) on a Java interface to the MySQL Clu
Additional concern, it does not appear that the mentors are planning
to
be on the PMC. Why not?
Why is this a concern? Mentors volunteer to do mentoring to ensure the
project is viable and understands the Apache way, not necessarily to
develop code. If you trace the existing Apache project
3 is the minimal number that is needed for a formal acceptance. So I
see no problem with it. Click has been a successful open source
project done the Apache way before entering Apache, so I think it is
definitely ready to graduate now. While a possibility of a vote
deadlock exists, it does
Hmm.. 3 PMC members was always ok. Did it change recently?
I agree on a tangential point though (and accept some blame myself as
a mentor) that the project should've done more active recruiting of
committers with the potential to join the PMC. In fact there seem to
be good candidates, and t
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
