Hmm.. 3 PMC members was always ok. Did it change recently?
I agree on a tangential point though (and accept some blame myself as
a mentor) that the project should've done more active recruiting of
committers with the potential to join the PMC. In fact there seem to
be good candidates, and this is being discussed in Click right now. So
I suggest that we come back to this discussion later
if some mentors agree to stay on the PMC until there are more
committers, that might work.
Speaking for myself, I'd like to stay, as I like the project. Just
that I won't be able to contribute in any meaningful way due to the
lack of time. So I didn't want to simply pad the proposal with my name
to make it look better, and then go AWOL. I am sure they can find
great candidates from the existing user community.
Andrus
On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Niall Pemberton
<niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote:
Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems
that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave
with 3.
IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you
can't
get the three votes required to do anything....
Agree with that - if some mentors agree to stay on the PMC until there
are more committers, that might work.
But voting in more committers before graduating (assuming there are
contributors who deserve that) would be way better.
I'm -1 on graduating with only 3 PMC members, the risk is too big for
the project to become stuck and unable of voting.
-Bertrand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
