Re: [VOTE] Retire Annotator Podling

2025-08-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 10:29 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The Annotator podling has experienced minimal activity for some time, > with limited PPMC oversight and declining user interest in continuing > the project [1][2]. Given these factors, it appears the c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.1-incubating (rc0)

2025-08-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Casting my vote from the podling: +1 (binding) Regards JB Le mer. 30 juil. 2025 à 09:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of > Apache Polaris 1.0.1-incubating (rc0). We now kindly request the IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blaze into the Apache Incubator

2025-07-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 7:13 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I want to call a VOTE to accept Blaze into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Blaze+Proposal > > And the discussion: > https://lists.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache HertzBeat (Incubating) to become a Top Level Project

2025-07-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 2:44 AM Chao Gong wrote: > > Dear IPMC Members, > > The graduation discussion for Apache HertzBeat (Incubating) concluded with > positive feedback and no objections[1]. > As HertzBeat PPMC member, I am now calling a vote to graduate Apache > HertzB

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.1-incubating (rc0)

2025-07-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of Apache Polaris 1.0.1-incubating (rc0). We now kindly request the IPMC members to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/vqvkq95zc0b0x6vlhlc1crtz12fopn4y Vot

Re: [VOTE] Retire NLPCraft Podling

2025-07-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 8:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi all, > > The NLPCraft podling has experienced minimal activity for some time, with > limited PPMC oversight and declining user interest in continuing the project > [1][2]. Given these factors, it appears the co

Re: [DISCUSS] Blaze Proposal

2025-07-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Interesting proposal for sure. I share "questions" from the other about the name. Regards JB On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 5:54 AM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I’m excited to introduce a new project proposal: Blaze. > > Blaze accelerates Apache Spark SQL by providing an alternative vect

Re: [Result] [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0 (rc6)

2025-07-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
), 0 (non-binding) > +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) > -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) > > The vote thread is here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7sz32n69n202s68rbzq0x323ddv8y24r > > Yufei > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 3:42 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fory(incubating) v0.11.2-rc1

2025-07-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - signature and checksum are OK - DISCLAIMER is in the source distribution - LICENSE and NOTICE look good - ASF header is present in all expected files - No binary found in the source distribution Regards JB On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 12:13

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) 2.0.0-rc2

2025-07-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - signature and checksum are OK - DISCLAIMER is there - LICENSE and NOTICE are good (nit: NOTICE should not contain Greenplum and PostgreSQL mention because it's not coming from notice from Apache dependency and it's already covered in th

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache HertzBeat (Incubating) to Top-Level Project

2025-07-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi According to the maturity model, the releases, the community, I agree that HertzBeat looks good to graduate. Regards JB On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 12:34 PM Chao Gong wrote: > > Dear IPMC Members, > > Apache HertzBeat (Incubating) [1] entered the Apache Incubator on April 5, > 2024. After more th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.0.0 (rc6)

2025-07-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Casting my vote from the podling. Regards JB On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:48 PM Yufei Gu wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of Apache > Polaris 1.0.0 (rc6). We now kindly request the IPMC members review and vote > for this releas

Re: package names for Java classes in Apache projects/podlings

2025-07-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi PJ By default, the package names should start with org.apache. However, I remember we accepted (exceptional) other package name for existing projects joining the incubator as it impacts the existing community. I would consider more as a "transition" period. Regards JB On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fory to become a Top Level Project

2025-07-02 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 5:32 PM Shawn Yang wrote: > > Dear IPMC Members, > > The discussion for graduating Apache Fory has concluded with no objections > and positive feedback from multiple IPMC members[1]. As Fory PPMC member, I > now call a vote to graduate Apache Fory t

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

2025-06-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone Due to an important issue found on the JDBC persistence backend, I cancel this vote. I will prepare a RC5 as soon as the issue is fixed. Regards JB Le ven. 30 mai 2025 à 22:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Polaris community has voted and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gluten (incubating) 1.4.0-RC1

2025-05-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
0 (binding) I checked: * in the source distribution ** incubating is in the name/version ** checksum and signature are good ** DISCLAIMER is present ** LICENSE doesn't look good to me: it should mention the files containing code copied from Delta (Snapshot.scala, UpdateCommand.scala, etc), Spark (

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4)

2025-05-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc4). We now kindly request the Incubator to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/fnhcmzqx81wh6j8fv5wc2m7j1xo867j5

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.4.0-RC7

2025-05-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0 (binding) I checked: * in the source distribution ** incubating is in the version/name ** signature and checksum are good ** DISCLAIMER is present ** LICENSE and NOTICE looks good ** No binary file found ** Some files don't have header in the console: *** public/css/console1412.css *** src/comp

Re: [VOTE] Accept GeaFlow into the Apache Incubator

2025-05-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:25 PM Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi All, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread of GeaFlow [1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept GeaFlow into the Apache Incubator, please check out the GeaFlow > Proposal from the incubator wiki [2]. > > Ple

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluss into the Apache Incubator

2025-05-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:36 PM Yu Li wrote: > > Hi All, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on Fluss [1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Fluss into the Apache Incubator, please check out the Fluss > Proposal from the incubator wiki [2]. > > Please cast you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate #3

2025-05-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Casting my vote from the podling: +1 (binding) Regards JB On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 4:17 AM Vinish Reddy wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache XTable (Incubating) > for 0.3.0-incubating, rc3 > > The Apache XTable (Incubating) community has voted and approved >

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept GeaFlow into Apache Incubator

2025-05-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Willem Sorry for being late on that. The proposal looks interesting, graph db scope is a challenging space where community and contributions can help for sure. Agree to move forward on a vote. Regards JB On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 3:27 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > It's been a whi

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fluss

2025-05-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ve also > updated the proposal [1] accordingly to reflect your involvement. > > Best Regards, > Yu > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/FlussProposal > > On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 16:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fluss

2025-05-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Fluss is a very interesting project. I would be happy to help ! Regards JB On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:43 AM Yu Li wrote: > > Hi All, > > > I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and > you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details. > > > Fluss is a dist

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Flight SQL ODBC Driver

2025-05-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It seems those 3 people have signed ICLAs already. We should be good. Thanks, Regards JB On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi > > Yes, I think so these ICLAs are required. > > I did a diff with the JDBC IP Clearance > (https://incubator.ap

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Flight SQL ODBC Driver

2025-05-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Yes, I think so these ICLAs are required. I did a diff with the JDBC IP Clearance (https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-jdbc-driver.html). Regards JB On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 9:11 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi > > A previous discussion on this said that ICLAs were req

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Flight SQL ODBC Driver

2025-05-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
To be clear: anyone who worked on ODBC at Dremio were employed of Dremio, not necessary with Apache ICLA signed. On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:52 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > Sorry - the contractor thing is my speculation. Laurent simply stated > > "[...]the individuals mentioned in the ip

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Arrow Flight SQL ODBC Driver

2025-05-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The code was under the Apache license since the beginning but without header setted (as far as I know). I will check with Laurent internally. Regards JB On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 8:38 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I can also see that the Apache license was added later, so the code wasn’t >

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.4.0-RC5 (Round2)

2025-05-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ill fix it. Is it convenient for you to post some details about the > LICENSE not passing? > > On 2025/05/14 15:34:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > -1 (binding) > > > > I checked: > > - OK: source distribution signature and checksum are OK > > - OK:

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.4.0-RC5 (Round2)

2025-05-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-1 (binding) I checked: - OK: source distribution signature and checksum are OK - OK: LICENSE and NOTICE are good in the source distribution (nit: it's not required to have Maven wrapper NOTICE as it's an ASF project) - OK: DISCLAIMER is present in the source distribution - OK: ASF header is prese

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
pond to the Jars that are being published. I checked to > validate that assumption, which is why I'm asking. > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 9:31 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi Ryan > > > > This release includes: > > 1. source distribution (as in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Ok I found the problem: the script is supposed to include license inline for bsd and mit but it doesn’t. I’m fixing. Thanks ! Regards JB Le lun. 12 mai 2025 à 07:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi > > I think all bundled dependencies are documented. > > About the commen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi I think all bundled dependencies are documented. About the comment regarding BSD/MIT, let me check, we do things similar to other ASF projects here. Thanks ! Regards JB On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:29 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > Good catch for DISCLAIMER, I forgot to include it, I wi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks, let me do a pass (with the committers who added these files). On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:19 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > A few files you mention are not pure code copied, it's probably inspired > > but not full copy. > > Other files were "inspired by” or changed significantly or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Good catch for DISCLAIMER, I forgot to include it, I will do it. Does it mean that all jar files should include DISCLAIMER (not sure podlings are doing that) ? For LICENSE and NOTICE, it's a mix: I have a script to o a first pass (only LICENSE), then I did a manual pass and the NOTICE manually

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi A few files you mention are not pure code copied, it's probably inspired but not full copy. I will do a new pass. Thanks ! Regards JB On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:29 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > It looks like a few more third-party files not mentioned in the LICENSE may > also have inco

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks for your reply. It’s also my understanding and what I applied initially. I’m doing the changes. Thanks ! Regards JB Le dim. 11 mai 2025 à 12:02, Justin Mclean a écrit : > Hi, > > > Do you think what's provided in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-684 is accurate/complete

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin Do you think what's provided in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-684 is accurate/complete ? I see you mention: "Any project that doesn't include NOTICE content from bundled Apache licensed code will likely get a -1 vote. See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin Thanks for your feedback. I will do the changes. I'm very frustrated but I did all these changes before the previous release, but we got different "confusing" messages during the vote asking for changes. Anyway, let's move forward :) Regards JB On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 3:21 AM Justin M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin Picocli NOTICE mentions GPL is coming from OpenJDK documentation copied in the Picocli source distribution (documentation), not included in jar. I know that GPL is not allowed, but we don't have GPL dependency here: - picocli is using Apache license - picocli jar doesn't include GPL res

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It’s documentation file so no it’s only in source, not in the jar. Le dim. 11 mai 2025 à 02:41, Justin Mclean a écrit : > Hi, > > > The NOTICE contains the Picocli NOTICE, mentioning: > > > > | This project includes one or more documentation files from OpenJDK, > > licensed under GPL v2 with Cla

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
t's OK for me. I propose to remove the Picocli NOTICE as it does not really apply in Polaris case. Regards JB On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 12:19 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi Justin > > I'm confused about some points: > > 1. about Iceberg and Nessie NOTICE, during th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin I'm confused about some points: 1. about Iceberg and Nessie NOTICE, during the 0.9.0 vote, you asked to remove it explicitly. Are you now asking to add it (as I did initially) ? And Iceberg NOTICE is not required as it's an ASF project. 2. Is really ASF header a blocker ? I see the same

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, due to a mistake in the admin distribution LICENSE, I cancel this RC and I will submit/fix a new one. Regards JB On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Are there bundled Jars? If not, then that would make this simpler. > > Ryan > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 4:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Casting my +1 (binding) from podling vote. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > Le mer.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Amoro(incubating) 0.8.0-incubating rc3

2025-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks ! Much appreciated! Regards JB Le ven. 9 mai 2025 à 04:19, Tao Wang a écrit : > Thanks for your verification, JB. > I have created a issue to track this. > https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3552 > and it will be fixed in next release. > > On 2025/05/07 12:59:22 Je

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Casting my +1 (binding) from podling vote. Regards JB Le mer. 7 mai 2025 à 14:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of > Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2). > We now kindly request t

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2)

2025-05-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, The Apache Polaris community has voted and approved the release of Apache Polaris 0.10.0-beta-incubating (rc2). We now kindly request the IPMC members (and everyone) to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0ywnzmp481f1p0l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Amoro(incubating) 0.8.0-incubating rc3

2025-05-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - signature and checksum are good for the source distribution - the LICENSE in the source distribution is OK. Nit: I think it would be great to mention code coming from other projects (MemorySize is coming from Flink, DynMethods, etc are coming from Parquet). It's OK becaus

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gravitino to become a Top Level Projec

2025-05-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:48 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > While there hasn't been much feedback on the discussion thread, there have > been no objections and a week has passed, so I’m starting a vote for Apache > Gravitino. > > There is a discussion thread at: > h

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) as a Top level Project

2025-04-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:13 AM Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi all, > > We’ve got positive feedback on the DISCUSS threads for graduation [1,2] as > well es on our dev list vote [3], and would like to start a VOTE now. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to gra

Re: [VOTE] Accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator

2025-04-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) The number of mentors is OK to me (maybe others may have "concerns"). Regards JB On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:37 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I want to call a VOTE to accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp

Re: [DISCUSS] Project Name Must Be Resolved Before Entering Incubation

2025-04-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi As said on the PR, the project SHOULD do a name search, it's up to them if they don't want to change the name later. We can encourage projects to do name search just after joining the incubator, I don't think we should hold project waiting the name search. So, I think SHOULD is more appropriat

Re: [VOTE] Accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator

2025-04-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Go :) Regards JB On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 2:03 PM Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Hey all, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal > > And the discussio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.10.1-rc2

2025-04-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the version - DISCLAIMER is there - LICENSE should mention java/fury-core/src/main/java/org/apache/fury/util/StringUtils.java as copied from commons-lang3 - NOTICE should contain the full/correct NOTICE for Spark (https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/bran

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator

2025-04-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HamiltonProposal > > And the discussion: > https://lists.

Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal

2025-03-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Willem The proposal is interesting. I have two questions: - any relation with existing MQTT brokers (Apache ActiveMQ, etc) ? - do you have plans to grow the community, especially "outside" of Asia ? Regards JB On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 1:29 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I’m exci

Re: Projects incubating for a long time

2025-03-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin About Nemo, I already recommended to discuss about retirement, I don't see a lot of activity. About Livy, we have activity on the project (contributions), but we should have a more strong activity on release. We discussed about retirement while ago but the community stepped up and Livy

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

2025-03-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin, That sounds reasonable to me to add in the maturity model. Regards JB On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 6:56 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > There’s a discussion on the board list about using "creator of Apache Foo”. > [1] Also, see the current policy on it. [2] (i.e “original creator” ca

[ANN] Apache Polaris 0.9.0-incubating has been released!

2025-03-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The Apache Polaris podling team is pleased to announce Apache Polaris 0.9.0-incubating release. Apache Polaris (incubating) is an open-source, fully-featured catalog for Apache Iceberg™. It implements Iceberg's REST API, enabling seamless multi-engine interoperability across a wide range of platfo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.1.0-RC5

2025-03-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Are we talking about RC1 or RC5 ? I'm confused. On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 5:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating is in the name/version > - hash and checksum are good > - DISCLAIMER is there and good > - LICENSE and NOTIC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.1.0-RC5

2025-03-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Agree, it confuses me as the title doesn't match the version in the message. Regards JB On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 5:34 PM Min Ji wrote: > > Hi, > > The email subject looks a bit off – it doesn't match what's written in the > body. > > Warm regards, > > Ji Min > > luky116 于2025年3月7日周五 00:05写道: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.1.0-RC5

2025-03-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - hash and checksum are good - DISCLAIMER is there and good - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - no binary file found in the source distribution - some files don't contain ASF header: - CONTRIBUTING.md - README.md - pkg/datasource/

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, This vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Ryan Blue, JB Onofré, PJ Fanning, Kent Yao Thanks everyone for your vote. I will finalize the release. Regards JB On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This is a call for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Casting my vote here. Regards JB On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 7:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6. > > The Polaris community has voted and approved Apache Polaris > (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jars that are built in the gradle build contain not META-INF > LICENSE or NOTICE (or DISCLAIMER). I think they should. > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 11:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > Ack: > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Ack: https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/polaris/KEYS Regards JB Le ven. 21 févr. 2025 à 10:39, sebb a écrit : > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incuba

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6. The Polaris community has voted and approved Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6. We are now asking the IPMC to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2-rc3 (incubating)

2025-02-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - hash and checksum are good (both for source and binary distributions) - DISCLAIMER is there and good - LICENSE and NOTICE look good in the source distribution - LICENSE and NOTICE (nit: there is no need to copy NOTICE from all ASF proje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Teaclave TrustZone SDK (incubating) v0.4.0-rc.1

2025-02-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - hash and checksum are OK - LICENSE should mention tls_client-rs main.rs is copied from https://github.com/rustls/rustls/blob/v/0.21.0/examples/src/bin/simpleclient.rs - NOTICE is OK - DISCLAIMER_WIP contains "Releases may have incomplet

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5

2025-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks. For NOTICE your vote said OK, but I cleaned up the NOTICE content (just mentioning the Nessie copyright, but removing Netty mention as it’s not used). I hope it’s ok for you. Regards JB Le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 à 16:51, Justin Mclean a écrit : > Hi, > > The Fury project uses a standard di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.10.0-rc1

2025-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the version/name - hash and checksum are ok - LICENSE is OK - NOTICE is OK but we can cleanup all ASF projects mention as it's already covered by "This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/)". - DISC

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5

2025-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, I cancel this vote in order to fix the DISCLAIMER file. Regards JB On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5. > > The Polaris community has voted a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5

2025-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Le jeu. 13 févr. 2025 à 04:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi Justin > > Thanks for your review. > > Can you point what's wrong with the DISCLAIMER_WIP ? > > In Polaris, the DISCLAIMER_WIP says: > > "Apache Polaris is an effort undergoing incubation at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5

2025-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Justin Thanks for your review. Can you point what's wrong with the DISCLAIMER_WIP ? In Polaris, the DISCLAIMER_WIP says: "Apache Polaris is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator. Incubation is required of all newly accepted

[VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5

2025-02-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi folks, This is a call for the vote to release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5. The Polaris community has voted and approved Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc5. We are now asking the IPMC to review and vote for this release. Polaris community vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thre

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC5

2025-02-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Casting my +1 (binding) from the dev mailing list (see https://lists.apache.org/thread/24y2h0y5z108zn062o7djwkh6kf538mz) I mentioned a few nits (not release blocker) that Wayang can address in next releases. Thanks, Regards JB On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 4:59 PM Paul King wrote: > > I'd normally exp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.3.0-RC3

2025-02-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
t; org.apache.seata.server.logging.logback.ExtendedWhitespaceThrowableProxyConverter > > - - - - - > > Is this correct? > > > - NOTICE should be updated to include Snap.svg NOTICE > > yes, i will add Snap.svg to NOTICE > > Warm regards, > Te Wang > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Seata (Incubating) 2.3.0-RC3

2025-02-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - hash and checksum are good - DISCLAIMER is present - LICENSE (source distribution) is not fully correct imho: - mvnw and mvnw.cmd should be mentioned in LICENSE as it's a copy from Maven - ExtendedWhitespaceThrowableProxyConve

Re: [VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

2025-01-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 6:27 PM Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal > And the discussion: > https://lists.apac

Re: PouchDB would like to join

2025-01-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Jan It seems there are different communities, so I understand the purpose. Thanks for the details! Regards JB On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:53 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > > On 30. Jan 2025, at 09:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > Hi Jan > > > &

Re: PouchDB would like to join

2025-01-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Jan It sounds great ! I just have a very stupid question: there's no chance to gather CouchDB/PouchDB in the same project ? It's not clear to me if CouchDB and PouchDB have their own communities or it's a more "technical" split. If you need a mentor/champion, please let me know if I can help.

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

2025-01-28 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Yonik The proposal looks interesting and it's pretty clear. Good luck with the proposal ! Regards JB On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:22 PM Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Apache Incubator, > > We would like to propose a new project: Iggy. > Iggy is a message streaming platform written in Rust, and is c

Re: podling security issues

2025-01-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi This is a good proposal. As part of the new reporting tool for project, it's a security section is part of the report. So, it makes sense to have it for podlings. Regards JB On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 2:35 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I didn't follow up on this when I raised it in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wayang (Incubating) 1.0.0 RC4

2025-01-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
-1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - signature and hash are OK - DISCLAIMER is there However: - docs copy code from jquery* under the MIT license. It should be mentioned in the LICENSE (see https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps) - docs copy code fr

Re: [DISCUSS] Update project maturity model to include trademark and branding?

2024-12-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi, It looks good to me. Thanks for proposing this ! Regards JB On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 3:07 AM tison wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a continued effort of the thread "Update project maturity > model to include trademark and branding?"[1] early this year. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/oc9j

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StreamPark (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

2024-12-12 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:18 AM Huajie Wang wrote: > > Hi All, > > > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread for graduation [1], > and would like to start an official VOTE thread now. > > > Below are some facts and project highlights from the incubation phase >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache KIE(incubating) v10.0.0-rc4

2024-12-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+0.8 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - DISCLAIMER-WIP is there - NOTICE and LICENSE are OK (the LICENSE is OK for source distribution, but I guess we should have another one for binary distribution, especially about Hibernate) - several files don't include ASF header (buil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HugeGraph (Incubating) 1.5.0-rc3

2024-12-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name - checksum and signatures are OK - LICENSE and NOTICE look good - DISCLAIMER is present - ASF header present in expected file - No binary file found in source distribution Regards JB On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:18 PM VGalaxies wrote: > > Hello In

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hunter into the ASF Incubator

2024-11-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:15 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j > and its proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterPr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fury(incubating) v0.9.0-rc2

2024-11-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - incubating is in the name/version - hash and signature are correct - DISCLAIMER is there - NOTICE is there (maybe worth to consider grouping all license notices in the main/root NOTICE file) - LICENSE is there and look good, the licenses folder is a bit confusing, maybe m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate #2

2024-11-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Casting my vote from dev mailing list. Regards JB Le mar. 5 nov. 2024 à 08:42, Vinish Reddy a écrit : > Hey everyone, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache XTable (Incubating) > for 0.2.0-incubating, rc2 > > The Apache XTable (Incubating) community has voted and approv

Re: Content to be updated for Apache Polaris (Incubating)?

2024-10-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi There is a rebranding/change effort ongoing. It should be fixed soon. Regards JB Le mer. 16 oct. 2024 à 11:29, tison a écrit : > Hi, > > I noticed that Snowflake's documentation site contains several pages > that still refer to Polaris as a Snowflake product [1]. > > [1] https://other-docs

Re: [VOTE] Accept CloudBerry into the ASF Incubator

2024-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) NB: I see two mentors on the proposal. Are you planning to add one ? Regards JB On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 2:10 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following the discussion about CloudBerry > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/1f8jwpjnn430bhsjq98qxlgjojpqrfdh), > and after seein

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudBerry Proposal

2024-10-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Roman It looks interesting. I see you already listed the Cat X dependencies which is great. I just have one question (curiosity): are you planning to have all "modules" in one repo or separate repos ? (bootcamp, gpbackup, ...) Regards JB On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 5:18 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote

Re: [DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

2024-09-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
; On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote: > >> > >> Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1],

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

2024-09-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote: > > Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1], a SQL parser > implemented in Rust. > > Please vote to approve this contribution. > > This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v1.0.1-rc2

2024-09-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - name is correct (with incubating) - signature and checksum are ok - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER files are present and look good - ASF header is present in all file - No unexpected binary file in the source distribution Regards JB On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:43 PM Zikuan An

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Answer(Incubating) v1.4.0-RC1

2024-09-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) I checked: - signature and checksum are good - incubating is in the name - LICENSE and NOTICE look good - ASF header is present in all files - No unexpected binary file in the source distribution Regards JB On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 4:27 AM Robin Ren wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gravitino (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC5

2024-09-05 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) (sorry I didn't have time to vote on Gravitino dev mailing list before, so I vote here) I checked: - checksum and signature are OK - incubating is in the name - DISCLAIMER-WIP.txt is there - NOTICE and LICENSE look good - ASF header are present (rat is happy) - no binary file found i

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >