It’s documentation file so no it’s only in source, not in the jar. Le dim. 11 mai 2025 à 02:41, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> a écrit :
> Hi, > > > The NOTICE contains the Picocli NOTICE, mentioning: > > > > | This project includes one or more documentation files from OpenJDK, > > licensed under GPL v2 with Classpath Exception. > > | > > | These files are included in the source distributions, not in the > > binary distributions of this project. > > > > We use binary distribution of picocli (not source distribution): it's > > the jar we bundle in Polaris admin distribution. > > If they are in the source distributions, they would be in the binary as > well right? How does having a GPL dependency and distribution that OK? > [1][2] > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
