Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Rafael Espindola wrote:
>>> Because the right one should have been
>>>
>>> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*'
>>>
>>
>> That is what "git clone" adds, but with that "git branch -r" will not
>> list the remote branches.
>
> Uhm, it
Rafael Espindola writes:
>>> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
>>
>> This will put the remote branch heads in refs/remotes, you might want to
>> put them in refs/remotes/origin instead.
>>
>> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch
>> '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remo
> Uhm, it does here (I don't have a GCC repo, it's another one):
I think the problem is that the GCC repo is set up in some unusual way.
> $ git branch -r
> mirror/cpp
> mirror/exc-handling-alternate-fix
> mirror/filesystem
> mirror/ipv6
> mirror/magritte
> mirror/master
> mirror/omnibrows
Rafael Espindola wrote:
>> Because the right one should have been
>>
>> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*'
>>
>
> That is what "git clone" adds, but with that "git branch -r" will not
> list the remote branches.
Uhm, it does here (I don't have a GCC repo,
> Because the right one should have been
>
> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*'
>
That is what "git clone" adds, but with that "git branch -r" will not
list the remote branches.
>
> Paolo
>
Cheers,
--
Rafael Avila de Espindola
Google | Gordon House | B
Rafael Espindola wrote:
>>> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
>> This will put the remote branch heads in refs/remotes, you might want to
>> put them in refs/remotes/origin instead.
>>
>> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch
>> '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/or
>> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
>
> This will put the remote branch heads in refs/remotes, you might want to
> put them in refs/remotes/origin instead.
>
> $ git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/origin/*'
One small problem I ha
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't think adding YA place that has to be updated when things change
> is a good idea. If this is a script that runs on gcc.gnu.org then you
> should be able to get the full name with a minimal amount of effort
> using a getpw* function.
Okay, I
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> I've been waiting until I had the time to rewrite my import with proper
>>> author names. Does anyone have a correspondence file mapping the login
>>> name to Author?
>> I have a list th
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> I've been waiting until I had the time to rewrite my import with proper
>> author names. Does anyone have a correspondence file mapping the login
>> name to Author?
> I have a list that is about 4 months old. Should be pretty complete.
Cute. How abo
It fixed itself. :)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:14:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:09:57PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> >>> "Christopher" == Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PRO
On 24/04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
| In case it isn't obvious, I don't know how to fix this.
Well, I guess it fixed itself then since it's now working again :)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:14:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:09:57PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>Christopher> After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on
>>Christopher> gcc.gnu.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:09:57PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
>> "Christopher" == Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Christopher> After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on
>Christopher> gcc.gnu.org so that the git repository is updated every
>Christopher> time an ema
> "Christopher" == Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christopher> After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on
Christopher> gcc.gnu.org so that the git repository is updated every
Christopher> time an email message is received from the gcc-cvs
Christopher> mailing list.
C
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 21:07 +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on the same
> machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org"
> would allow to split the load between machines (even if
> "hg.gcc.gnu.org"
> and "git.gcc.gnu.org"
Some of branches situated not on top of /branch directory in svn. For
example redhat branches situated under /branch/redhat. There is only one
branch 'redhat' in the git repository, that contain all redhat branches as
directory. It's not very suitable. Does it possible to track this branches
separa
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 11:34 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On 4/19/08, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem with commits is that the average is not what matters.
> > Commits are bursty.
> > People make 5 commits to different branches in the course of a minute
> > or two, then there
On 4/19/08, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with commits is that the average is not what matters.
> Commits are bursty.
> People make 5 commits to different branches in the course of a minute
> or two, then there is nothing for another 15 minutes, etc.
Oh. Well... I still
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:30 AM, NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/18/08, Christopher Faylor
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on gcc.gnu.org so that
> > the git repository is updated every time an email message is received
> > fr
On 4/19/08, NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/18/08, Christopher Faylor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incorporating the 121 brings the average to 36 (next highest past 121
> is 53, all other values are below 38.
s/38/48, 48 being the number of daily commits under the 30 minute model
On 4/18/08, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on gcc.gnu.org so that
> the git repository is updated every time an email message is received
> from the gcc-cvs mailing list.
>
> We'll be monitoring the system to see if there is a load
On 18/04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
| After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on gcc.gnu.org so that
| the git repository is updated every time an email message is received
| from the gcc-cvs mailing list.
Great! Thanks to both of you.
After consultation with Dan, I have set things up on gcc.gnu.org so that
the git repository is updated every time an email message is received
from the gcc-cvs mailing list.
We'll be monitoring the system to see if there is a load hit. If so,
we'll probably drop back to Dan's original method.
cg
>> I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on
>> the same machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org"
>> and "git.gcc.gnu.org" would allow to split the load between
>> machines (even if "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org"
>> are the same
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on the
>> same machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and
>> "git.gcc.gnu.org" would allow to split the load between machines
>> (even i
> I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on the
> same machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and
> "git.gcc.gnu.org" would allow to split the load between machines
> (even if "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org" are the same
> machines originally).
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>
>
> I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on the same
> machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org"
> would allow to split the load between ma
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| I know you think this is personal, as per your email below, but it really
isn't.
| I had it set up to do it after every commit, and it drove our load
| average up a noticeable amount.
| As such, I stopped doing it and set it to run every 30 minutes.
|
| > I know
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>
> | > However, having it synced periodically rather than after every commit is
> | > an annoyance.
> |
> | True, but it won't change anytime soon because it would place more
> | loa
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| > However, having it synced periodically rather than after every commit is
| > an annoyance.
|
| True, but it won't change anytime soon because it would place more
| load, and require more locking (since there is no guarantee a git sync
| will finish before the
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> | > how is the GIT repository synced? Is there a hook which updates it
> | > after a svn commit?
> |
> | No.
> | It is synced every 30 minutes.
> |
> | >
> | > I'm about to sw
On 18/04, Daniel Berlin wrote:
| > how is the GIT repository synced? Is there a hook which updates it
| > after a svn commit?
|
| No.
| It is synced every 30 minutes.
|
| >
| > I'm about to switch from infradead to gcc.gnu.org, and I want to make
| > sure that the latter is synced at least a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Daniel" == Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches
> Daniel> but no tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script
> Daniel> u
> "Daniel" == Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches
Daniel> but no tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script
Daniel> up to update it appropriately.
Daniel,
how is the GIT repository synced? Is there a ho
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
>> branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
>>
>> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Daniel" == Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
> Daniel> branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
>
> Daniel> g
Hi,
Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how did you setup the git repository? The branch heads are supposed to
> be located under "/refs/heads/" on gcc.gnu.org, not under
> "/refs/remotes/", where you generally find the remote references:
> those branches aren't supposed to be remote on
> "Daniel" == Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
Daniel> branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
Daniel> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
Daniel,
how did y
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
> > branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
> >
> > git config --add remote.origin.
"Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
> branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
>
> git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
This will put the remote branch heads in refs/remot
No, nothing is wrong wit he import, if you want all the remote
branches, you have to ask git to get all the remote branches
git config --add remote.origin.fetch '+refs/remotes/*:refs/remotes/*'
Then fetch again.
then, if you want to really see all the branches, including the remote
ones, use git
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches but no
>> tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script up to update
>> it appropriately.
>>
>> Note that i will not announce
Hi,
"Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches but no
> tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script up to update
> it appropriately.
>
> Note that i will not announce this anywhere until someone steps
> forward to actua
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:37:36AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches but no
>> tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script up to update
>> it appropriately.
>>
>> Note that i will not announce this an
Daniel Berlin wrote:
I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches but no
tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script up to update
it appropriately.
Note that i will not announce this anywhere until someone steps
forward to actually maintain it because i do not know
I put my version of the gcc conversion (which has all branches but no
tags) at git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git and set a script up to update
it appropriately.
Note that i will not announce this anywhere until someone steps
forward to actually maintain it because i do not know GIT. Neither of
the pe
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 02:38:53PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> >
> > > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to pop
> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I was only suggesting it as a nicity, if people are happy with the
>> login name alone.
Paolo> What about "Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"? The overseers have
Paolo> the mapping, or you can sort of guess it from the names in the
Paolo>
Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been waiting until I had the time to rewrite my import with proper
> author names. Does anyone have a correspondence file mapping the login
> name to Author?
I have a list that is about 4 months old. Should be pretty complete.
Andreas.
--
An
I was only suggesting it as a nicity, if people are happy with the
login name alone.
What about "Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"? The overseers have the
mapping, or you can sort of guess it from the names in the ChangeLog.
This has to be decided before the first push, so it's kind of urgent
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 00:02 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Harvey Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is an artifact, it now creates them on the fly from the git repo
> > rather than caching them. git-svn should delete all of the temp index
> > fil
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Harvey Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an artifact, it now creates them on the fly from the git repo
> rather than caching them. git-svn should delete all of the temp index
> files, if these are just leftovers from an old import, ok. Otherwise
>
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:57 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Lots of projects use the Name format, gcc adds that to the
> > Changelog and the author is the login name, I was proposing to add
> > the Name format to the git repo to make things like gitk
> > nicer to use.
>
> There is no singula
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:57 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Harvey Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Harvey Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > >
> Lots of projects use the Name format, gcc adds that to the
> Changelog and the author is the login name, I was proposing to add
> the Name format to the git repo to make things like gitk
> nicer to use.
There is no singular mapping from login name to author, since we have
all used differen
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Harvey Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Harvey Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > > On We
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Guys, if you want, i can populate it with my git-svn clone, which has
> > > a svn roo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Hi -
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank C
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> >
> > > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate &
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access
> > as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should a
Hi -
>>OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access
>>as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work.
Is there GIT Web support ?
I believe a quoted line above already answers that question. But yes. :-)
Ah, http://gcc.gnu.org/git/ works, great.
Aaron
Hi -
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
[...]
OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access
as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work.
Just a reminder - an empty git repository has been ready for you for some
time.
Is th
Hi -
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> [...]
> OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access
> as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work.
Just a reminder - an empty git repository has been ready for you for some time.
- FC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yup. We can slot in a gcc git mirror beside the half-dozen others we
> already have. (Angela: the payload data is under the new
> /sourceware/projects/FOO-home/gitfiles directory; symlinks from /git.)
All of /sourceware/projects is backed up so it's covered. Thanks.
* Daniel Berlin:
> They could have made massive strides since then (this was a little
> over a year ago), but I wouldn't trust anything with that large of a
> scaling issue to have solved it in such a short time.
They still compute revision numbers on the fly in many commands, which
means that th
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
I could never understand why anyone would use anything but CVS (if that
works for them), or git. The VCS-du-jour craze just confuses me.
Version control is complicated, much more so than it first appears. There's
a very large design space. Knowing
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> [svn]
>noMetadata = true
This will prevent users from using the GCC git repository to bootstrap
their own local git-svn-aware repositories. We definitely don't want
to do this.
Ollie
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
>mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
>there.
Having done some heavy public git mirroring lately, and reconnecting old
trees (fixing history), the following might be useful:
Recommend
Hi -
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:47:52PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> As stated above, I'd like to request shell access to gcc.gnu.org to
> setup a git mirror of the GCC svn repository. I'd also suggest Harvey
> Harrison as a co-maintainer of the mirror, as he helped setting it up on
> gi
Hi -
> Git-daemon is already running, i think (frank, is this right?)
Yup. We can slot in a gcc git mirror beside the half-dozen others we
already have. (Angela: the payload data is under the new
/sourceware/projects/FOO-home/gitfiles directory; symlinks from /git.)
I'll try to set up the blan
My current plan is to bug a few of our devs to try git, and a few to
try hg (for a few weeks each), giving them whatever tutorials are
around, and see if they find it better enough than subversion.
I can try to use git, but I'm already quite experienced in it so I'm not
representative.
(Pe
Git-daemon is already running, i think (frank, is this right?)
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>
> > Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> >> mirror on gcc.gnu.org
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I could never understand why anyone would use anything but CVS (if that
> > works for them), or git. The VCS-du-jour craze just confuses me.
>
> I could understand a lot why people would use subversion and not CVS.
>
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Harvey Harrison wrote:
A few things I'd like to clean up if we move a copy over:
1) generate a author's file so the commits have better than just a login
name as the commiter/author.
Or in the ChangeLog.
Paolo
I could never understand why anyone would use anything but CVS (if that
works for them), or git. The VCS-du-jour craze just confuses me.
I could understand a lot why people would use subversion and not CVS.
Not that I like subversion a lot (the trunk/branches/tags system seems a
bit ad-hoc f
Ben Elliston wrote:
>> David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>>> To be honest, I find it weird that Subversion even exists. Precisely
>>> because it _is_ so close to what people were using before, as you point
>>> out. I've never really understood why anyone would bother to change from
>>> CVS to SVN -- it jus
Harvey Harrison wrote:
Actually, the newer git-svn's finally switched metadata format, so once
I get done moving it over, it will be ~350MB of git data and 50MB or so
of git-svn metadata. (rev_db vs rev_map format)
Finally.
--
\___/
|___| Bernardo Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\___\
Harvey Harrison wrote:
A few things I'd like to clean up if we move a copy over:
1) generate a author's file so the commits have better than just a login
name as the commiter/author.
Very good idea. And the pairing should already be in the aliases
file on gcc.gnu.org.
2) change the layout
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:47 +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> >> mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
> >> there.
> >
> > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] an
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:47 +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> >> mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
> >> there.
> >
> > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> >> mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
> >> there.
> >
> > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask what kind of sponsorship the
Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
there.
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask what kind of sponsorship they want
to require for a shell account (for write acc
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > To be honest, I find it weird that Subversion even exists. Precisely
> > because it _is_ so close to what people were using before, as you point
> > out. I've never really understood why anyone would bother to change from
> > CVS to SVN -- it just seems to be part of t
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:04 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
> It's not possible for a VCS to be "different" -- it can only be
> different from some other VCS.
That's true. For a non-distributed VCS, the 'norm' is generally
considered to be CVS. Subversion is "different from CVS", for a limited
number
* Joe Buck wrote on Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:17:18PM CET:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:01:46PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
[ switching to SVN ]
> > The unfortunate thing is that other FSF projects haven't yet
> > switched -- it baffles me that this is so.
> RMS has decided to back bzr for Emacs, and
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:46:12PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:01:46PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> >
> > However, if GCC proposes an official switch to a dVCS, RMS will push bzr.
> > That does
>
> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
> there.
>
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask what kind of sponsorship they want
to require for a shell account (for write access to repositories, we
usually only requi
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:01:46PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> However, if GCC proposes an official switch to a dVCS, RMS will push bzr.
> That doesn't mean he gets his way; he wasn't happy with the svn switch
> because sv
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even simple things, like having to do git diff -rHEAD instead of git
> > diff to see added files, etc.
>
> LOL! You can't be serious: why would *compiler* *developers*
> be unable to grasp a few command line syn
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:01:46PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> David> using before, as you point out. I've never really understood
> David> why anyone would bother to change from CVS to SVN -- it just
> David> seems to be part of the 'one VCS per project' insanity.
>
> I suspect you haven't loo
On 13/03/2008, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:35 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > If by "really weird" you mean "nobody has any real complaints about
> > the way it works and are happy it is close to what they were using
> > before", then yes, they are using
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:59 +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Fair enough. I hereby volunteer to setup and maintain the git
> mirror on gcc.gnu.org if someone provides me a shell account
> there.
>
Feel free to include me if you need any help. Before you move it to
gcc.
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:35 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> If by "really weird" you mean "nobody has any real complaints about
>> the way it works and are happy it is close to what they were using
>> before", then yes, they are using something "really weird".
>
> To be hon
> "David" == David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:35 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> If by "really weird" you mean "nobody has any real complaints
>> about the way it works and are happy it is close to what they were
>> using before", then yes, they ar
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
