On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on the > > same machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and > > "git.gcc.gnu.org" would allow to split the load between machines > > (even if "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org" are the same > > machines originally). > > This would be a great idea, if only we had more machines :) Sadly, > machines and dns names are tricky for political reasons around gcc. > > Maybe they could be hosted on Savannah? The CVS repo. used to be > synced there. >
Used to, and then one day they just stopped doing it without telling anyone, and questions went unanswered. So uh, thanks but no thanks :)
