SPDX Statistics - 108 packages remaining

Hot news: - SPDX upstream finally got approved some of our licenses waiting in the queue. - in fedora-license-data - Richard and I are working together on old and painful issues. The number of open issues is now 52. I am so happy about it, because it was over 60 for ages. - almost every week

Re: SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

Miroslav Suchý writes: ... > Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest > priority for now) - 32 packages: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt > > Most of such packages has open issue in fedora-license-data. A lot of

Re: SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

Dne 02. 04. 25 v 12:30 odp. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a): Even after that is merged, I would have though 'license-validate' is still going to report an invalid expression, because BSD-3-Clause-Clear is not a permitted license, and license-validate doesn't know the package name & thus can't proces

Re: SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 31. 03. 25 v 2:14 odp. Vitaly Kuznetsov napsal(a): > > Miroslav Suchý writes: > > > > ... > > > > > Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest > > > priority for now) - 32 packages: > > > > > > https://p

Re: SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

Dne 31. 03. 25 v 2:14 odp. Vitaly Kuznetsov napsal(a): Miroslav Suchý writes: ... Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest priority for now) - 32 packages: https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt Most of such packages h

SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

Hot news: - the progress is hard and therefore slow. I stopped doing this stats in 2 week cycle and I will target 4-5 week cycle. - the progress on SPDX upstream in past months was nearly none, but yesterday there was a meeting and lots of new IDs has been approved. - in fedora-license-data

SPDX Statistics - 123 packages remaining

Hot news: - the review of licenses in queue has been stalled for several weeks Two weeks ago we had: * 24347spec files in Fedora * 30986license tags in all spec files * 127 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with LicenseRef-Callaway-*) * 2246tags have not b

SPDX Statistics - 127 packages remaining

Hot news: - the review of licenses in queue has been stalled for several weeks  Two weeks ago we had: * 24401spec files in Fedora * 31038license tags in all spec files * 142 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with LicenseRef-Callaway-*) * 2289 tags have not

SPDX Statistics - 142 packages remaining

Hot news: - no news today  Two weeks ago we had: * 24379spec files in Fedora * 30988license tags in all spec files * 161 tags are not SPDX compliant (number from line bellow minus packages with LicenseRef-Callaway-*) * 2325 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 21 tags can be trivial

Re: SPDX Statistics - 161 packages remaining

Dne 12. 01. 25 v 6:50 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a): Thanks for the reminder - I backported fixes from upstream for all four of my packages that are in this list, so there will be 51 later today. 🙂 Thank you. ("neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format" is also a bit of a lie - these four pack

Re: SPDX Statistics - 161 packages remaining

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 7:08 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest priority > for now) - 55 packages: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt Thanks for the reminder - I backported fixes fr

SPDX Statistics - 161 packages remaining

Hot news: - New version of upstream SPDX list has been released https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.26.0   Most of the licenses were added due to Fedora.  Three weeks (because of Christmas) ago we had: * 24368spec files in Fedora * 31025license tags in all spec files * 2

SPDX Statistics - 224 packages remaining

Hot news: - All PRs for firmware packages are merged. - Small improvements to legal-doc has been done. If you want to dive into the changes see https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-legal-docs/-/merge_requests/?sort=closed_at_desc&state=merged&first_page_size=20 Two weeks ago we had: * 2436

SPDX Statistics - 268 packages remaining

Hot news: - I walked through all firmware packages. And they have either PR waiting to be merged or issue created as fedora-license-data repository. - I walked throught our Packaging Guidelines and everywhere where was used Callaway license, I corrected it to SPDX expression. It was usually e

SPDX Statistics - 305 packages remaining

Hot news: - I walked through all packages with "Public Domain" license. For all such packages I identified the public domain dedication and added it to https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/public-domain-text.txt?ref_type=heads Richard F. did the review and I opened P

Re: SPDX Statistics - 360 packages remaining

On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hot news: > * 24311 spec files in Fedora > > * 30967 license tags in all spec files > > * 360 tags are not SPDX complient (number from line bellow minus packages > with LicenseRef-Callaway-*) > > * 2658 tags have not been convert

SPDX Statistics - 360 packages remaining

Hot news: - During review of packages with PublicDomain or Freely-Redistributable we discovered that the license is not in compliance with Fedora Linux. So several packages has to be removed from Fedora. E.g. libva-intel-hybrid-driver or several scumvm games. For more details see this tracking

SPDX Statistics - 404 packages remaining

Hot news: - I changed the summary and instead of the tidbits I put there how many packages are remaining. - I started counting the packages that has valid SPDX id and no changelog entry (e.g., MIT) as converted. Therefore the bump in statistics. If the license is indeed correct, we will find o

SPDX Statistics - Peek Edition

Hot news: - Many times I had to open PR and convert the license tag for package despite the fact that I already converted it previously. That is because a maintainer keeps the spec file somewehere else (in upstream) and on release just copy it to dist-git. If this is your workflow please sync u

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

Dne 27. 09. 24 v 4:27 odp. Karolina Surma napsal(a): I second Ben's findings, all of my packages have been migrated with a commit message saying "Review the License tag according to the SPDX standard" and with an added "# SPDX" comment if there was no change of the string. The automation should

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

Dne 27. 09. 24 v 4:01 odp. Ben Beasley napsal(a): The list of packages without SPDX, packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt, seems suspicious. It has quite a few packages I maintain that seem perfectly fine to me. NiaAML-GUI has:     # SPDX     License:    MIT and a commit/ch

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

> > NiaAML-GUI warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please > > check python-funcparserlib was probably still showing up for the same reason, I just went through a review again and this time added a changelog entry. Dridi -- ___ devel

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

I second Ben's findings, all of my packages have been migrated with a commit message saying "Review the License tag according to the SPDX standard" and with an added "# SPDX" comment if there was no change of the string. The automation should not report any of those. Karolina On 9/27/24 16:01

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

The list of packages without SPDX, packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt, seems suspicious. It has quite a few packages I maintain that seem perfectly fine to me. NiaAML-GUI has:     # SPDX     License:    MIT and a commit/changelog in its history entitled “Clarify that Licens

SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

Hot news: - I am going through "neither Callaway nor SPDX" license formulas. I submitted dozens PR for your packages. And beside obvious typos or partial conversion I see cases where maintainers use SPDX id of license. This is not enough the license id must have SPDX id **and** must be on fedor

SPDX Statistics - Almost There Edition

I will start with the tidbit first today. Why "Almost There Edition"? You can find that in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?gid=0#gid=0 we are done from 81%. But I will offer different view: 5970 packages are not converted yet. But out of

Re: SPDX Statistics - Montessori Edition

Dne 31. 08. 24 v 1:09 odp. Michael Schwendt napsal(a): On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:42:48 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: List by package maintainers is here https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt Well, both "audacious" and "audacious-plugins"

Re: SPDX Statistics - Montessori Edition

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:42:48 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > List by package maintainers is here > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt > Well, both "audacious" and "audacious-plugins" are almost done, except for the BSD variant they u

SPDX Statistics - Montessori Edition

Hot news: * Migration of all remaining licenses to LicenseRef-Callaway-* is in progress. Note that while such IDs are valid SPDX identifiers, it is not accepted license for Fedora. And it is reported as not valid. I will continue to report such licenses as "not converted". * Due the conversio

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

Dne 29. 08. 24 v 1:10 odp. Pavel Cahyna napsal(a): Hello, On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:55:13AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hot news:    SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license expression allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). This got into the specification b

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

Hello, On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:55:13AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hot news: > >    SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license > expression allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). This got into the > specification because of your (Fedora maintainers) feedback!

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

Dne 18. 08. 24 v 6:50 dop. Richard Fontana napsal(a): As noted by Ben, in this case you can optionally simplify it to: Slightly side note for anyone wanting to play with expressions: There is a library `license-expression` that allows you to operate with boolean logic of SPDX expressions. And

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 3:13 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 17. 08. 24 v 8:02 odp. Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a): > > I ended up with the following license tag that I moved to SPDX as part > of the incoming update: > > License: GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) > > I feel like I c

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 8:44 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > > At some point we added a rule, > > “A license should normally appear only once in the License: tag license > expression. But if the license expression includes an OR sub-expression, that > OR sub-expression is treated as though it were a sin

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

At some point we added a rule, “A license should normally appear only once in the License: tag license expression. But if the license expression includes an OR sub-expression, that OR sub-expression is treated as though it were a single license for purposes of this rule. *As an exception to

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

Dne 17. 08. 24 v 8:02 odp. Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a): I ended up with the following license tag that I moved to SPDX as part of the incoming update: License: GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) I feel like I could technically factor it to just "GPL-2.0-only AND MIT" because pi

Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

> Today we have: > > * 24312 spec files in Fedora > > * 30925 license tags in all spec files > > * 5740 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet Soon we will have 5739 license tags left to update as I'm ready to push a package update. kcov bundles 3 javascript libraries in HTML reports so I ended

SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

Hot news: * Almost all trivial conversion has been done. Only 208 "trivial" cases remains. I will not continue converting them to SPDX counterpart as there are various caveats hidden there. I will go over the remaining cases one by one. But it is likely that most of them will be converted to so

SPDX Statistics - Niki Lauda Edition

Hot news: * Big batch of GPL families was mass converted. * Sent email about packages with problems (licenses neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format). * Still on todo list: convert Perl licenses (already announced) and Public Domain, UltraPermissive, and Firmware. Two weeks ago we had: *

SPDX Statistics - House Sign Edition

Hot news: * FESCO agreed on decision about conversions. But there was a confusion about the wording, so the ticket is reopened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3230 * The confusion is just about "trivial" conversions. All others will be converted to LicenseRef-Callaway-$OLDID before Change Compl

Re: SPDX Statistics - Alice Edition

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > * Scancode-toolkit is present in Fedora 40 too. If you want to play with it - > here is the command line that gives *me* the best result: > scancode --license --license-references -n6 --html /tmp/scan.html > $DIR_WITH_UNPACKED_TARGZ I'm

SPDX Statistics - Alice Edition

Hot news: * Discussion about trivial conversion did not have consensus. I opened FESCO ticket https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3230 * Scancode-toolkit is present in Fedora 40 too. If you want to play with it - here is the command line that gives *me* the best result:   scancode --license --licen

Re: SPDX Statistics - Manchester Baby Edition

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:25 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > The first program run from memory was exeucted on 21. June 2024 1948 :) -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: SPDX Statistics - Manchester Baby Edition

On Friday, 21 June 2024 at 09:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hot news: > >  I sent lots of announces about automatic migrations. Miro Hrončok raised a > question. Feel free to join the discussion. Either here on legal ML. > >  Scancode-toolkit (very powerfull license scanner) and all its dependencie

SPDX Statistics - Manchester Baby Edition

Hot news:  I sent lots of announces about automatic migrations. Miro Hrončok raised a question. Feel free to join the discussion. Either here on legal ML.  Scancode-toolkit (very powerfull license scanner) and all its dependencies passed all Package Reviews and is heading to rawhide. Thank yo

SPDX Statistics - Rokoku Edition

Hot news:  SPDX released new license list https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.24.0 with 25 new licenses. Lot of them are there because of Fedora maintainers. Thank you. Two weeks ago we had: * 24034spec files in Fedora * 30706license tags in all spec files * 10497 tag

SPDX Statistics - Morse edition

Hot news:  SPDX released new license list https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.24.0 with 25 new licenses. Lot of them are there because of Fedora maintainers. Thank you. Two weeks ago we had: * 23990spec files in Fedora * 30640license tags in all spec files * 10589 ta

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

It is still not late to introduce e.g. `%callaway_licenses` macro and enclose the old licenses into such macro, to make it more obvious that those licenses were not converted yet. This should have been done from the start Vít Dne 13. 05. 24 v 23:41 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): Dne 13. 05

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

Dne 13. 05. 24 v 5:38 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a): Can we at least still recommend to use the AND / OR / WITH capitalization for Fedora license tags, even if the lower-case ones are technically considered valid now? The other way round. We will not encourage using lower case and all our exa

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:28 PM Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > On 10. 05. 24 10:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Hot news: > > > > > > > > SPDX v3 has been published.

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 10. 05. 24 10:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Hot news: > > > > > > SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license > > > expression allows lowerca

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

On 10. 05. 24 22:45, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:29 dop. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): So we can now have packages with uppercase AND/ORs and packages with lowercase and/ors and we can no longer quickly recognize SPDX expression by observing uppercase AND/ORs? That does not sound li

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10. 05. 24 10:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hot news: > > > > SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license > > expression allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). This got into the > > specification because

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:47 odp. Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a): Unless the BZs force a package to be updated you may very well end up with ~20% of the Fedora packages nearly forever not being updated with proper SPDX licenses as they are as likely or not going to be forever be on re-build auto-pilot (than

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:40 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > The current change > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 > > is planned to be the last one. At the end of this phase - scheduled to > 2024-08-06 - we plan to mark this conversion as "done". My estimation is that

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:29 dop. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): So we can now have packages with uppercase AND/ORs and packages with lowercase and/ors and we can no longer quickly recognize SPDX expression by observing uppercase AND/ORs? That does not sound like improvement to me :/ This is very very f

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

> SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license > expression > allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). Worth noting is that the spec [0] says thse should be either all-lowercase or ALL-UPPERCASE: > License expression operators (AND, and, OR, or, WITH and with) > shoul

Re: SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

On 10. 05. 24 10:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hot news:    SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license expression allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). This got into the specification because of your (Fedora maintainers) feedback! So we can now have packages wit

SPDX Statistics - Hulk edition

Hot news:    SPDX v3 has been published. The biggest change for us is that license expression allows lowercase operators (and, or, with). This got into the specification because of your (Fedora maintainers) feedback!    And there is new terminal AdditionRef-* which can be used for custom excep

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

Dne 03. 05. 24 v 10:44 dop. Tim Landscheidt napsal(a): Maybe I misunderstood the original post, but I did not per- ceive the intent of the data's publication to be informative and useful, but to motivate (converting the licenses). This. And to provide at least some estimates. When we started w

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

Dne 03. 05. 24 v 1:59 dop. Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a): Joking aside, I do agree the non-trivial conversions are likely to be the hard ones, and there will be a very long tail (many years more) for 100% as the work to deal with some of those hard ones may require expertise that is in limited or eve

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

John Reiser wrote: >> New projection when we will be finished is 2025-04-06 (+5 >> days from last report).  Pure linear approximation. > Such a linear approximation, based on the entire tracked history, > is the second worst possible estimate. (The worst possible estimate > is the output of a r

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

On 4/26/24 11:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote: New projection when we will be finished is 2025-04-06 (+5 days from last report).  Pure linear approximation. Such a linear approximation, based on the entire tracked history, is the second worst possible estimate. (The worst possible estimate is the ou

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:11 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > Just eyeballing the prediction graph in the Google doc, it looks like the > linear approximation is distorted by the big drop in "non-trivial" last > September. And, the slope for "converted" is pretty steep before that, but > significantly f

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

ble, but we'll also be enjoying the "SPDX statistics - X edition" tidbits for quite some time! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 08:20:43PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Graph of these data with the burndown chart: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing [...] > New projection when we will be finished is 2025-04-06 (+5 days from last >

SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

Hot news:    Automated migration of "trivial" conversions is in process. I migrated bunch of licenses that are only seldomly used. The bigger group (GPL*) are waiting at the starting line, but Jilayne asked me to wait a moment as she wants to check few things. I expect that the progress resumes

SPDX Statistics - Human Space Flight edition

Hot news: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ contains usage column for licenses that are allowed for something (documentation, firmware...)    Automated migration of "trivial" conversions have started (see other threads in this mailing list). Two weeks ago we had:

SPDX Statistics - Comenius edition

Hot news:     The last phase https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 has been approved with FESCO. Two weeks ago we had: * 23821spec files in Fedora * 30463license tags in all spec files * 11091 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 4996 tags can be trivially conv

Re: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

Dne 21. 03. 24 v 19:47 kloc...@fedoraproject.org napsal(a): Those trivial substs probably would cover +90% of all packages in time in my estimation. See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit#gid=0 The "trivial" conversion is possible for 499

Re: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:53 PM Tomasz Kłoczko > > While I agree with some of what you're saying here, the problem is > that it is, in fact, *not trivial* in many cases. > Migrating the License tag from Callaway to SPDX identifiers is only > the "easy" part of the transition. > Re-reviewing pa

Re: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

Dne 20. 03. 24 v 15:20 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): Migrating the License tag from Callaway to SPDX identifiers is only the "easy" part of the transition. Re-reviewing package contents and re-classifying licenses is the non-trivial part, and that definitely can't be scripted. *nod* 1) Trivial ex

Re: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:53 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 10:03, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> >> Hot news: >> >> The last phase has been announce >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will >> proceed when approved with FESCO. > > > I think

Re: SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 10:03, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hot news: > The last phase has been announce > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will > proceed when approved with FESCO. > I think that generally you are wasting your man/hours posting such statistics. T

SPDX Statistics - Book Smugglers edition

Hot news:     The last phase has been announce https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will proceed when approved with FESCO. RC2 of SPDX v.3 specification has been published. https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0/

SPDX Statistics - Beginning of the year edition

Hot news:     fedora-license-data has Copr project https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/osci/fedora-license-data where new package is built whenever new PR is merged     The last phase is ready for wrangler https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will proceed

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

Going purely by upstream support status, yes, GConf2 should be retired; it’s been obsolete for a decade. Going by dependent packages, it’s not so simple. Some of these dependencies are no doubt spurious, optional, or otherwise “removable;” others are real hard dependencies from outdated-but-st

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

Dne 26. 02. 24 v 15:51 Richard Hughes napsal(a): If the SPDX listing isn't using src.fedoraproject.org and instead using something like bugzilla please yell. Being listed as maintaining all those also makes the packager-dashboard basically useless for me too. 🙂 I am using a script: https://pag

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:51:34PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > * 23711 spec files in Fedora > > I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found > that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like > https://src.fedorapro

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general > creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages? > > I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit c

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general > creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages? I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit confused why I'm on so many packages as a separate committer.

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 09:54, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > * 23711 spec files in Fedora > > I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found > that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rp

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > * 23711 spec files in Fedora I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GConf2 According to that I have "commit" ACLs, but I couldn't

SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

Hot news:     SPDX did a new release of license list with 43 new licenses. Most of them were added thank to Fedora maintainers https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases Two weeks ago we had: * 23711spec files in Fedora * 30306license tags in all spec files * 11542 tags have not been

SPDX Statistics - Selkirk edition

Hot news: Richard and I had several days PTOs, so the progress of MR in fedora-license-data was affected by this. Now lets dive into numbers: Two weeks ago we had: * 23681 spec files in Fedora * 30232license tags in all spec files * 11697 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 5264tag

SPDX Statistics - Lisa edition

Hot news: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_3 was approved. I generated license analysis using scancode-toolkit for all remaining packages http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/ Now lets dive into numbers: Two weeks ago we had: * 23542 spec files in Fedora *

Re: SPDX Statistics - Eight-hour day edition

Dne 05. 01. 24 v 8:14 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): To ease the migration I created a scantool-tookit reports for remaining packages. It is available here http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/ Right now there are missing packages from ELN set and all other missing Fedora packages from A t

Re: SPDX Statistics - Eight-hour day edition

Dne 05. 01. 24 v 7:38 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): Hot news: I forgot to mention one thing: To ease the migration I created a scantool-tookit reports for remaining packages. It is available here http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/ Right now there are missing packages from ELN set an

SPDX Statistics - Eight-hour day edition

Hot news: The process of adding licenses is back on track. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_3 has been submitted. Now lets dive into numbers: Two weeks ago we had: * 23562 spec files in Fedora * 30067license tags in all spec files * 11907 tags have not been conver

SPDX Statistics - Public Christmas Tree edition

Hot news: We added new license LicenseRef-Fedora-Firmware that we use for firmware that does not have clear license declarations and only "Redistributable..."-like declarations. https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/460/diffs The process of adding the licenses on

SPDX Statistics - Freeze 'Em All edition

Hot news: We added new license LicenseRef-Not-Copyrightable that should be used for packages like foo-filesystem that e.g., create just directories and does not have copyrightable code nor content. The process of adding the licenses on list is still very slow recently. I made an error when ad

SPDX Statistics - Origin of Species edition

Hot news: I have started looking at Cavil - tool that audit the licensing info after each commit. The process of adding the licenses on list is still very slow recently. Now lets dive into numbers: Two weeks ago we had: * 23365 spec files in Fedora * 29583license tags in all spec files *

RE: Reichspogromnacht (was: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition)

For the record, Americans use the term Kristallnacht, and American Jews do not find it offensive. It is used as the symbolic start date of the holocaust, and there are often memorial services. > > > Note that the term "Kristallnacht" (or "Reichskristallnacht") is > > > itself a nazi propaganda te

Reichspogromnacht (was: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition)

Hi, On Thursday, 2023-11-16 11:19:24 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Am Do., 16. Nov. 2023 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Why Kristallnachte edition? On today's date at 1938, was i Kristallnacht > > > (Night of Brok

Re: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition

Am Do., 16. Nov. 2023 um 01:27 Uhr schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>: > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Why Kristallnachte edition? On today's date at 1938, was i Kristallnacht > > (Night of Broken Glass) - a pogrom against Jews in Germany. It was first > > step where every

Re: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Why Kristallnachte edition? On today's date at 1938, was i Kristallnacht > (Night of Broken Glass) - a pogrom against Jews in Germany. It was first > step where every other step was worse than the previous one. It was > basicaly a first step that lead to holocaust. > > htt

SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition

Hot news: Robert-Andre Mauchin packaged python-spdx-tools for Fedora. For scancode-toolkit - all dependencies are finally reviewed and present in Fedora, scancode-toolkit is in the middle of review. Big thanks to Robert and everybody who did the package reviews. The process of adding the lice

SPDX Statistics - Wichterle edition

Hot news: fedora-license data now includes machine readable field with known exceptions to use otherwise not-allowed exception https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/422 This  field is already exported to JSON and license-validate understand it: $ license-validat

Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

On 10/13/23 08:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hot news: There was new release of SPDX License list. If you want to see impact of Fedora work you can check number of new licenses in recent releases and compare https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases and compare it with content of the rel

Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

On 10/13/23 2:46 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, Oct 13 2023 at 08:15:39 AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Scancode-toolkit is not yet in Fedora, but you can instal it form PyPI: > >     $ pip install scancode-toolkit > $  ~/.local/bin/scancode --license --html /tmp/spdx.html . > I

  1   2   3   >