Dne 17. 08. 24 v 8:02 odp. Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
I ended up with the following license tag that I moved to SPDX as part of the incoming update:License: GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) I feel like I could technically factor it to just "GPL-2.0-only AND MIT" because picking either license in the dual-licensed js script will effectively result in just that, but I kept the expanded license tag to reflect the presence of a dual-licensed piece of software (and because I saw nothing resembling this case in the guidelines). What is the preferred expression here? Are they both correct?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis "you should not attempt to simplify or reduce the License tag" So full license expression is correct. I.e. GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) in your case. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
