On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:53 PM Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczko.tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 10:03, Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hot news: >> >> The last phase has been announce >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will >> proceed when approved with FESCO. > > > I think that generally you are wasting your man/hours posting such statistics. > The same time could be used better by going with a few grep. sort, sed > oneliers to co update and align all packages License: fields and commit all > those changes across all per packages repos in a few minutes. > Some of the proven packagers with RW access to all packages repos can apply > necessary changes in a few tenths of minutes. > Subject of SPDX migrations are already IIRC active since July 2022 (soon it > will be two years anniversary). > All those changes should not be applied relying on each package maintainers > because that change is from Trival™️ class.
While I agree with some of what you're saying here, the problem is that it is, in fact, *not trivial* in many cases. Migrating the License tag from Callaway to SPDX identifiers is only the "easy" part of the transition. Re-reviewing package contents and re-classifying licenses is the non-trivial part, and that definitely can't be scripted. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
