Dne 27. 09. 24 v 4:01 odp. Ben Beasley napsal(a):
The list of packages without SPDX, packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt, seems suspicious. It has quite a few
packages I maintain that seem perfectly fine to me.
----
NiaAML-GUI has:
# SPDX
License: MIT
and a commit/changelog in its history entitled “Clarify that License is SPDX
MIT”.
The reasons are in the first file:
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
for NiaAML-GUI it states:
|> NiaAML-GUI warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check hmm... you are right, I had a error in
my script in detection of dist-git changelog. Next time it will not be reported. |
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
