Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (binding) Thanks Dan! On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Anton >> >> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks пише: >> >>> Hey Everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to raise the proposal to mak

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Anton > > пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks пише: > >> Hey Everyone, >> >> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >> by default to a vote.

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to discuss and vote! I'm going to call the vote as passing with: 9 +1 binding votes 6 +1 non-binding votes (no 0/-1 votes cast) -Dan On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:22 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > +1 > > Op di 1 apr 2025 om 21:15 schreef Péter Váry > >> +1 >>

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi wrote: > >> +1. >> >> Gang Wu 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 Op di 1 apr 2025 om 21:15 schreef Péter Váry > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 17:22 Steve Zhang > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Steve Zhang >> >> >> >> On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 17:22 Steve Zhang wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > > On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (non binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:05 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding)

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:42 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > > > > Hey Everyone, > > > > I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required by default > to a vote. > > > > There was general s

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:42 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > > Hey Everyone, > > I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required by default to a > vote. > > There was general support for this change in the discussion thread with the > reasoning that it would le

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:53 PM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:44 PM Renjie Liu > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:44 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> Gang Wu 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： >>> +1 (non-binding) On Tue, A

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi wrote: > +1. > > Gang Wu 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1. Gang Wu 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks Dan! >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks Dan! >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 P

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks Dan! > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - Anton >>> >>> пн, 31 бер. 202

Re: [VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

+1 (binding) - Anton пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks пише: > Hey Everyone, > > I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required > by default to a vote. > > There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >

[VOTE] Row lineage required for v3

Hey Everyone, I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required by default to a vote. There was general support for this change in the discussion thread with the reasoning t