+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi <ror...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1. > > Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks Dan! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>> aokolnyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> - Anton >>>>>> >>>>>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a >>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>>>>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow >>>>>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for >>>>>>> writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> be handled separately from these changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>> >>>>>>
