+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:44 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi <ror...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1. >>> >>> Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Dan! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>>>> aokolnyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Anton >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a >>>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we >>>>>>>>> allow >>>>>>>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own >>>>>>>>> semantics, but >>>>>>>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag >>>>>>>>> for writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was >>>>>>>>> raised, but >>>>>>>>> can be handled separately from these changes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
