+1. Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道：
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks Dan! >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>> aokolnyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> - Anton >>>>> >>>>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a >>>>>> vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>>>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow >>>>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, >>>>>> but >>>>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>>>> >>>>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for >>>>>> writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but >>>>>> can >>>>>> be handled separately from these changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>>
