+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:07 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:42 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hey Everyone, > > > > I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required by default > to a vote. > > > > There was general support for this change in the discussion thread with > the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow > engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, but > indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. > > > > An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for > writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but can > be handled separately from these changes. > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . > > > > Thanks, > > -Dan >
