+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks Dan! >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> - Anton >>>> >>>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>>> >>>>> Hey Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a vote. >>>>> >>>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow >>>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, but >>>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>>> >>>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for >>>>> writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but can >>>>> be handled separately from these changes. >>>>> >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Dan >>>>> >>>>
