+1 (binding) Thanks Dan!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Anton >> >> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >> >>> Hey Everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a vote. >>> >>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow >>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, but >>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>> >>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for >>> writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but can >>> be handled separately from these changes. >>> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Dan >>> >>
