+1 On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks Dan! > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - Anton >>> >>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>> >>>> Hey Everyone, >>>> >>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a vote. >>>> >>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we allow >>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, but >>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>> >>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag for >>>> writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, but can >>>> be handled separately from these changes. >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>
