+1 On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 7:27 PM roryqi <ror...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> 于2025年4月1日周二 09:30写道： >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 5:15 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 2:22 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Dan! >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 1:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:01 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>>> aokolnyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Anton >>>>>>> >>>>>>> пн, 31 бер. 2025 р. о 11:43 Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> пише: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey Everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to raise the proposal to make row-lineage required >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12580> by default to a >>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was general support for this change in the discussion thread >>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ms3t9jp628z6mlkgbtxv7q92fo8bm3nl> with >>>>>>>> the reasoning that it would lead to broader adoption. Notably, we >>>>>>>> allow >>>>>>>> engines to model inserts/deletes/updates based on their own semantics, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> indicate a preference for row ids to be preserved where feasible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An open question of whether we should include a property or flag >>>>>>>> for writers to signal whether or not row ids are preserved was raised, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>> can be handled separately from these changes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Make row lineage required in v3 >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I object to these changes because . . . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
