Hi,
>> It also found that the NOTICE file is missing.
OK I've added that - not that the binary and source have different notice files.
I made an educated guess at the copyright years for Digital Primates.
Copyright (c) 2007-2011, Digital Primates IT Consulting Group
Any advance on 2007-2011?
An
Good question, I'm not sure exactly.
Part of it is getting the right version, part of it is knowing how to make
sure you didn't embarrass yourself with the fix. Knowing what counts as a
fix. Other vague uncertainties.
If there was a way to pull, and then just commit with a message about which
jir
On 3/16/14 10:23 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>I wonder what is in flexunit1lib.swc? I couldn't find the source.
>> Anybody know where it is?
>I's assume it Adobe's earlier version of FlexUnit?
OK, found it here: http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/wiki
Sounds like FlexUnit is in pretty good
HI,
> It found that RAT said there are 4 binaries in the source kit.
Thanks I'll look into those.
> It also found that the NOTICE file is missing.
I'll add that.
> Should flexunit's package name be "apache-flex-flexunit-"?
Sounds reasonable to me.
> I wonder what is in flexunit1lib.swc? I cou
I tried adapting my ant script to run on FlexUnit.
It found that RAT said there are 4 binaries in the source kit. Font.fla,
font.swf, empty.swf and thumbs.db. I think there is an fla in the SDK, so
font.fla could stay as an exception, but we should look inside to see
what is in it. If it is fo
On 3/16/14 9:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I think the note should be a call to action without comments on
>>people's time commitment or how hard it is to find time,
>
>The initial draft was more like that but there were objections - so not
>sure which is the best way here.
>
>Thanks
Hi,
> I think the note should be a call to action without comments on people's time
> commitment or how hard it is to find time,
The initial draft was more like that but there were objections - so not sure
which is the best way here.
Thanks for the feedback.
Justin
Hi,
> A lot has been going on in Apache Flex in recent months. In case you
> haven't been following on the dev list, Here's a brief overview of the
> current state of the project and milestones since becoming a top level
> project.
That reads much better thanks.
> And I would add to the list o
>Open a JIRA ticket at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
>for the Infrastructure project. Tell them what you want to do and we'll see
>what happens.
Thanks.
I will give it a whirl,
Mike
I think the note should be a call to action without comments on people's time
commitment or how hard it is to find time, etc. it is to be expected that
Committers will fade away and new ones replace old.
There is a reason that merit does not expire. We always welcome people back and
gladly.
Re
Hmm. I still don't like the first line. The "it's been hardŠ" assumes
that folks think it has been hard. Also, please propose a subject as well.
Maybe "Apache Flex Progress Report"?
How about for the first two lines:
A lot has been going on in Apache Flex in recent months. In case you
haven't
On 3/16/14 7:56 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>>Please try it yourself.
>Ok, but I couldn't find in this thread a detaild description of the
>issue. Could you please point me to the exact mail, and if none, describe
>what needs to be tested.
Use the RC7 to install 4.12. Then compile as many of
Hi,
> flex.apage.org ?
Yep :-)
Thanks,
Justin
On 3/16/14 8:48 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>Mike, I'm pretty sure in past threads I've asked you to work with Infra
>>directly by filing a JIRA. Can you do that? I >think it would go more
>>smoothly if you worked directly with them.
>
>Please feel free to send me that thread. I was fai
flex.apage.org ?
Typo...
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft email to committers
Hi,
Here's my second draft. It's now intended to be sent directly to all committers.
Hi,
Here's my second draft. It's now intended to be sent directly to all committers.
--- start draft ---
Hi Apache Flex Committer,
A lot has been going on in Apache Flex in recent months and it’s been hard to
keep up to date with all of the news.
Here's a brief overview of the current state of
I made a ticket to track MTI changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34149
2014-03-16 23:55 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi Maxime,
>
> thanks for pointing to the new component. As you said MTI doesn't support
> LTR direction right now. At this point I think there's other features th
Thank you. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Building-new-skins-for-Android-4-x-and-iOS7-tp35848p35951.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.co
I will reopen it and do some additional test in this case.
Thanks guys. now for me is much clear how to step with it.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/No-reproduced-issues-tp3594
Hi,
Click on on of the build number to see what was included in that build.
For example https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_release/530/
Shows last changes were:
1. Script to copy RC into release area
2. don't touch locale in -config.xml and flex-description
Justin
Hi Maxime,
thanks for pointing to the new component. As you said MTI doesn't support
LTR direction right now. At this point I think there's other features that
will IMO more needed (i.e: Mobile support). As I have no experience with
LTR text I don't know how needed is that feature, so at this mome
Actually, you assumed that since it couldn't be reproduced, then it was fixed
in 4.12.
To be sure, I think you should install 4.11, reproduce the error, then test
again with 4.12, and check if it disappeared.
What do you think?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk/ => build
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_release/ => nightly
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : piotrz [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 16 mars 2014 23:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Building new skins for Androi
Great job Maurice! :)
I will check it tomorrow when nightly will be ready.
Btw. Where can I found some status of whether nightly was built or not?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.c
HI,
> For example today I've resolved this issue ->
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057 because I couldn't
> reproduce it, but I'm not convinced that is fully alright.
Did you try in the browser ie not AIR?
At the very least I'd paste the code you used to test the issue before mar
Hi Team,
I'm working on list of easyfix issues and try to reproduce some of them.
For example today I've resolved this issue ->
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34057 because I couldn't
reproduce it, but I'm not convinced that is fully alright.
How should I proceed?
Should I just comm
Hi,
Please take a look RC1 of Apache Flex FlexUnit, try it out and provide some
feedback.
The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexunit/4.2.0/rc1/
The binary distributions as a convenience are available here:
https://dist.
Good news.
I have just completed support for @media os-version for Android.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33949
Committed and pushed to develop.
I also added support for 3 part version numbers (such as 4.1.2).
The only constraint is that it needs to be quoted, or the mxmlc compiler
Hi,
> Yes, please delete swfobject from the repo.
Done.
> The practice in the other repos is to only run RAT on the source package, not
> the results after building
Done.
I think it in a state that usable to make a release candidate.
Justin
Hi,
> So maybe we should remove the first sentence "we have noticed you have been
> doing nothing for a while"
> And maybe simply describe the situation and ask if people are still
> interested in the project, and the areas where help is needed.
>
> Maybe we should send to ALL committers, so t
Hi,
> As a lurker, I will just say that it's still rather "scary" to make an
> official JIRA, or patch, or whatever the process is.
What's scary about it you just need to attach a fix to a JIRA. Hopefully it
will be reviewed and added to the SKD by a committer will and if all test pass
it will s
Hi,
> Just another note from the security side of this.
The photo is optional (or can be of anything but most people have used an
actually photo of themselves) and the text doesn't need to contain any
personal information. I see this as a minimal risk especially as committer can
choose to pu
Hi,
I have added a few entries in .gitignore to ignore AIR-SDK related files (see
below)
so that I can overlay AIR-SDK in flex-sdk/ working directory and thus use it as
an IDE SDK.
None of these entries are currently in the sdk source, so it should be harmless.
Let me know if there is any prob
> - Work have progressed on FlexJS to a point we are nearing creating a
first release
I think FlexJS is near first alpha release, maybe pointing to a "first
release" would be misleading.
I second this kind of email since it's a "call to arms" good for the
project. Maybe in the end it could have n
> I thought it was the original intent to send to all committers.
You are right, the initial mail says " to send out to all committers",
but then I got mistaken by the first sentence:
" We've noticed that you have not contributed to the project in a while".
__
Excerpt from the ini
I personally know tons of old Flex developers that for all intensive
purposes believe Flex is still "Dead". When I inform them of all the great
stuff you guys have been accomplishing, they always get excited. Everybody
still loves Flex, it just hasn't been cool, hip, and trendy since HTML 5!!!
came
Everyone's workload ebbs and flows. Sending out nagging messages isn't
going to help that. However a message that gets sent out with just
positive updates / messages I'm fine.
-Mark
Just another note from the security side of this. Some people don't put
their name / pictures on lists because sometimes they end up good methods
to support stalkers or disgruntled people and yes I've seen it happen
before.
Luckily we do have a decentralized group of people without office bui
> Labriola or some other FlexUnit expert can tell us if they are for
> required features?
I will do my best to monitor this thread. I think all relevant issues have been
discussed in threads before but, if for any reason, you are waiting on a
response here from me or need technical info and don
>Mike, I'm pretty sure in past threads I've asked you to work with Infra
>directly by filing a JIRA. Can you do that? I >think it would go more
>smoothly if you worked directly with them.
Please feel free to send me that thread. I was fairly certain you were
discussing this with infra.
I kno
On 3/16/2014 10:23 AM, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
I see your point.
Thanks!
Maybe we should send to ALL committers, so that no-one feels "uncomfortable"
with that.
I thought it was the original intent to send to all committers.
WDYT?
I don't understand why the email needs to be sent at al
>Please try it yourself.
Ok, but I couldn't find in this thread a detaild description of the issue.
Could you please point me to the exact mail, and if none, describe what needs
to be tested.
> I have to defer to the non-en_US folks on these matters. One question: do
> all of your projects se
On 3/16/14 2:53 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>IIUC, installer 3.0 is good enough, but the installer.xml file in the
>4.12 release SDK is not good.
>
>So IMO, we shouldn't make a release now, because in this case, installer
>3.0 will replace 2.7 as the default installer page (installer.html).
I see your point.
So maybe we should remove the first sentence "we have noticed you have been
doing nothing for a while"
And maybe simply describe the situation and ask if people are still interested
in the project, and the areas where help is needed.
Also, I think it's important, as Justin sa
On 3/16/14 12:44 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't
>>been
>> donated regardless of license.
>OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they
>have no effect on the release packages.
Yes, please de
On 3/16/2014 9:41 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like the one
you posted.
Can expand on why? Email private@ or me off list if you feel for some reason it
shouldn't be discussed on this list.
I'm not sure what to expand upon beyo
Hi,
> I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like the one
> you posted.
Can expand on why? Email private@ or me off list if you feel for some reason it
shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Thanks,
Justin
>
> it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
>> contribute to the project as possible.
>>
> Are you sure?
> I do not see that listed anywhere in Apache's PMC Guidelines:
> https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
You are kidding, right? If "proper management and oversight" doe
On 3/16/2014 3:37 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
contribute to the project as possible.
Are you sure?
I do not see that listed anywhere in Apache's PMC Guidelines:
https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepr
As a lurker, I will just say that it's still rather "scary" to make an
official JIRA, or patch, or whatever the process is. The bureaucracy itself
is rather scary to be honest.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On
On 3/15/2014 9:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
What changes do you think are required for it to sent from the PMC?
Thanks, Justin
I do not think the PMC--as a group--should be sending out emails like
the one you posted.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-37
IIUC, installer 3.0 is good enough, but the installer.xml file in the 4.12
release SDK is not good.
So IMO, we shouldn't make a release now, because in this case, installer 3.0
will replace 2.7 as the default installer page (installer.html).
So people who install Flex using the official combin
Hi,
> So, this issue can apparently be fixed by a new SDK release, not a new
> Installer RC. If I understand that correctly, there is no reason to veto
> the Installer release because of an SDK issue that happened to come to
> light when testing the Installer.
IMO there is - the ant script is rea
>Did you install the Flex-compatible AIR SDK?
I installed it from this page:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/air-sdk-download.html
(AIRSDK_Compiler.zip)
So I will use the standalone one from:
http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/4.0/AdobeAIRSDK.zip
(url from installer config file).
Th
>
> > Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
> It's a problem with the installer ant file in the 4.12 released SDK I
> believe. Lok like ALex may of just corrected the issue.
>
So, this issue can apparently be fixed by a new SDK release, not a new
Installer RC. If I understand that c
>I'm not sure what is "not moral" about it.
I agree, it's not the right word (I am not native English speaker).
Still think it's inaccurate and unfair, as all methods that claim to "measure"
human performance/activity or whatever...
Maybe that's in the French culture, and people in the US are
Hi,
> Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
It's a problem with the installer ant file in the 4.12 released SDK I believe.
Lok like ALex may of just corrected the issue.
> This is really Alex's call at this point.
Or people who voted +1 can look into the issue and decide to change
Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12?
This is really Alex's call at this point. He has the votes to make the
release happen.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in the US, and I didn't
>
Hi,
Sorry if it's inconvenient but as per Apache guidelines votes are on source
releases not binaries and as PMC members we need to abide by that.
Justin
>
> Official Apache releases are source only, the binaries are just a
> connivence nothing more.
That's not a really helpful - and very unnecessary - reminder, as it
doesn't change anything, does it? There are no (known) issues with building
the source. So all we're talking about are issues with
Hi,
> Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in the US, and I didn't
> see the issue...
80+% of people who install the SDK are outside of the US and who may use an
locale other than en_US. I guess some would use en_US but a lot wouldn't -
either way that's a significant amount of users
Hi,
> We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't been
> donated regardless of license.
OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they have
no effect on the release packages.
> We went over these on September 13-15 in a thread called "FlexUni
80+%?
Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in the US, and I didn't
see the issue...
EdB
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So everyone who voted +1 is willing to support out the 80+% of user who
> are effect by the locale issue?
>
> Justin
--
Ix
Hi,
> Any issues (incorrectly) building from source will probably not happen that
> often in the wild, as this is realistically speaking a utility for which
> even devs will download the binaries.
Official Apache releases are source only, the binaries are just a connivence
nothing more.
Justin
Let's not discuss this to death, please.
I very much like Justin's proposal. I think that he can sign on behalf of
the PMC, as it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to
contribute to the project as possible. As a PMC member you can't be against
an effort to get people to contri
Hi,
So everyone who voted +1 is willing to support out the 80+% of user who are
effect by the locale issue?
Justin
I'm with Om. Call 3.0.
Any issues (incorrectly) building from source will probably not happen that
often in the wild, as this is realistically speaking a utility for which
even devs will download the binaries.
EdB
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2014 1
On 3/15/14 11:45 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, swfobject must be removed from the repo. I don't think the folks
>>who
>> signed the SGA had the right to donate SWFObject.
>
>If the file contains the correct licence (ie MIT) is that still an issue?
>With MIT licences file you are al
68 matches
Mail list logo
