On 3/16/14 12:44 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't >>been >> donated regardless of license. >OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they >have no effect on the release packages. Yes, please delete swfobject from the repo. Then at some point, add downloading swfobject to the relevant build script. > >> We went over these on September 13-15 in a thread called "FlexUnit >> License". Hamcrest appears to be BSD, Mockolate appears to be MIT. I >> wonder what RAT is catching about those? >It complaining that their license files are not Apache licences, which is >correct but we would be in violation of their licences to change that. > >I can add them to the rat exclusion list or we can just ignore this - >what do you think is best? I see, RAT doesn't handle Category A. The practice in the other repos is to only run RAT on the source package, not the results after building, so I would change the build scripts to do that. -Alex
