Hi, > We've been conservative and don't put things in our repo that haven't been > donated regardless of license. OK so is the solution to delete those files from the repo? Currently they have no effect on the release packages.
> We went over these on September 13-15 in a thread called "FlexUnit > License". Hamcrest appears to be BSD, Mockolate appears to be MIT. I > wonder what RAT is catching about those? It complaining that their license files are not Apache licences, which is correct but we would be in violation of their licences to change that. I can add them to the rat exclusion list or we can just ignore this - what do you think is best? > What is in the MANIFEST.MF? One of these I believe [1] it's not included in the release. Thanks, Justin 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_file
