These are the features that we plan to submit for the 19.11 release:
Intel(r) Ethernet 810 Series Network Adapter Enhancements: Support for loading
of device-specific Dynamic Device Personalization (DDP) profiles to support new
protocols, rte_flow/flow director/switch filter updates to support D
These are the features that we plan to submit for the 19.08 release:
Intel(r) Ethernet 800 Series Network Adapter Enhancements: Enhancements to the
ICE and IAVF PMDs to support rte_flow, ethertype and tunnel filters, and inner
L3/L4 checksum strip/insertion for Intel(r) Ethernet 800 Series Netw
These are the features that we plan to submit for the 19.05 release:
Intel® QuickAssist Technology (Intel® QAT) Asymmetric Crypto: The initial
implementation will provide support for modexp and modinv. Additional
algorithms will be supported in future releases.
Intel® QAT AES-XTS Support
Int
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2018 2:01 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.02 Intel Roadmap
>
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 01:
As discussed at yesterday's Release Status Meeting, we need to update our
Roadmap page (http://core.dpdk.org/roadmap/) for 19.02. The features that we
plan to contribute are described below. We'll submit a patch to update the
roadmap page with this info.
vDPA Live Migration Software Fallback:
The agenda for the DPDK Summit on December 3rd and 4th in San Jose is now
available at:
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/dpdknorthamerica2018/dpdk-na-program/agenda/.
Thanks to everybody who submitted proposals. The quality of the submissions
was very high, and it was a difficult job t
nding, you can also register at:
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/dpdknorthamerica2018/dpdkattend/register/.
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 9:46 AM
> To:
This year's DPDK Summit North America has been confirmed for December 3rd and
4th in Club Auto Sport in San Jose (the same venue as last year). Like last
year it will be immediately followed by this year's OVS Conference
(http://www.openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2018/), which is on December 5th
it for DPDK Summit USA.
Anybody planning to attend who hasn't registered yet should do so at:
https://www.regonline.com/DPDKDublin
> -Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 9:54 AM
> To: 'annou...@dpdk.org'
> Subject
Now that the 18.08 release is complete, we need to update the roadmap for
18.11. The features that we plan to contribute are described below. We'll
submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
Add Crypto Support to Packet Framework: A new Crypto port type will be added to
the port
ublin
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 4:46 PM
> To: 'annou...@dpdk.org'
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] CFP for DPDK Summit Userspace
>
> The CFP for D
The registration link for this event is now also available at:
https://www.regonline.com/DPDKDublin. Please register soon to guarantee your
place.
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesda
The CFP for DPDK Summit Userspace (September 5th & 6th in Dublin) is available
now at: https://goo.gl/forms/Jh70MIA7QJE2nSBb2.
The deadline for submissions is Friday July 27th. Submissions should focus on
the key technical challenges facing the project. Suggested topics include:
* New APIs, libr
Now that the 18.05 release is complete, we need to update the roadmap for
18.08. The features that we plan to contribute are below. We'll submit a patch
to update the roadmap page with this info.
Power Management: Turbo Core Thread Pinning - An API will be created to
distinguish between regula
This year's Userspace event will take place on September 5th and 6th. The venue
will be the same as for the last 2 years - The Clayton Hotel, Ballsbridge,
Dublin (https://www.claytonhotelballsbridge.com/).
Details on registration and CFP will be provided closer to the time. For now, I
just want
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 10:34 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] deadlines postponed
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose to shift the proposal deadline and the integration deadline
> for 18
Now that the 18.02 release is complete, we need to update the 18.05 roadmap.
These are the features that we plan to contribute:
vHost Selective Data Path: Provide support for a selective datapath in the
vhost-user library. The default datapath will be the existing software
implementation. Alter
With the 17.11 release almost complete, it's time to start thinking about
18.02. These are the features that we plan to contribute:
Add Classification and Metering to SoftNIC PMD: The SoftNIC PMD provides
software equivalency for Ethernet device (ethdev) features. Currently, only the
Traffic Ma
The agenda for the DPDK Summit North America is available now at:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/dpdk-north-america-summit/program/agenda.
The event is on November 14th and 15th at Club Auto Sport in San Jose. If
you're planning to attend and haven't done so already, you can register a
The original CFP deadline for our DPDK Summit North America expired yesterday.
This has now been extended to Friday October 13th (note that the website
currently says Wednesday 13th but that's just a typo and will be corrected).
So, if you were planning to submit a proposal but didn't make the d
ummit. The event
is on November 14th and 15th at Club Auto Sport in San Jose. The CFP closes on
Wednesday October 4th.
> -Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:06 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; annou...@dpdk.org
> Subject:
o so at:
https://dpdksummit.com/us/en/registration-userspace.
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 3:36 PM
> To: annou...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-announce] Plan for European
; From: announce [mailto:announce-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:09 PM
> To: annou...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] Plan for European and USA DPDK Summits
>
> A few people have been asking about the dates for our European
/archives/dev/2017-May/066888.html.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:19 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 17.11 Intel Roadmap
>
> Below are the features that we
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.11 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
It would be good if others are also willing to share their plans so that we can
build up a complete picture of what's planned for 17.11 and make sure there'
A few people have been asking about the dates for our European (Userspace) and
USA DPDK Summits, so I wanted to send an update on the status. Planning for
these is a little behind where we've been in previous years, because we needed
to complete the transition to the LF and get the governing boa
mance-thread/common/arch/arm64/stack.h
>
> These are actually written by me and not taken from the github link.
> By mistake I copied the license entirely :)
>
> For these files, I shall remove it and re-post a v3.
>
> Thanks
> Ashwin
>
>
> On Mon, 2017
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>
> There can be a licensing issue here.
> We may need advice from the Governing Board and the Technical Board.
That's correct. This uses a 2-clause BSD license, but the Intellectual Property
Policy section in the Project Cha
For anybody attending the OPNFV Summit in Beijing in June, we'll be holding a
DPDK/FD.io mini summit on Tuesday June 13th from 9:00 - 17:00. This will be
similar to the event that we held in Berlin last year. Further details on the
event are available at:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/even
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.08 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
It would be good if others are also willing to share their plans so that we can
build up a complete picture of what's planned for 17.08 and make sure there'
We're pleased to announce our first DPDK Summit of 2017, which will be held in
Bangalore on April 25th and 26th. These events provide an opportunity for the
DPDK community to meet face-to-face and discuss the future direction of the
project. The agenda will cover the latest developments to the D
; in
> >> QEMU together with the supporting host code outside QEMU (see 3.)
> and
> >> the lower layer of the code using it in guests (kernel + user
> space)
> >> provide something that to me very much looks like a device model.
> >>
> >> Devi
> From: Vincent JARDIN [mailto:vincent.jar...@6wind.com]
>
> Le 15/03/2017 à 11:55, Thomas Monjalon a écrit :
> >> I'd suggest that this is a good topic for the next Tech Board
> meeting.
> > I agree Tim.
> > CC'ing techboard to add this item to the agenda of the next meeting.
>
> Frankly, I disa
I've included a couple of specific comments inline below, and a general comment
here.
We have somebody proposing to add a new driver to DPDK. It's standalone and
doesn't affect any of the core libraries. They're willing to maintain the
driver and have included a patch to update the maintainers
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 8:07 PM
> > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com;
> > balasubramanian.manoha...@cavium.com; hemant.ag
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>
> Hi all,
>
> When DPDK was a small project, it was easy to propose a major change,
> get feedback from the few contributors and figure a decision.
> It had the drawback of the lack of various point of views.
> So we probabl
I'm forwarding this to the announce list so that it reaches a wider audience,
because not every has subscribed to the moving list. Anybody interested in
membership of the DPDK project when it moves to The Linux Foundation should
reply privately to Mike (mdo...@linuxfoundation.org).
Tim
> From
> From: Hanoch Haim (hhaim) [mailto:hh...@cisco.com]
>
> Hi Tim,
> It's great that you are going to expose the i40E Qos capability, would
> it be possible to expose the low-latency configuration too?
We don't have any plans to do this at the moment, but we will consider it in
the future.
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.05 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
It would be good if others are also willing to share their plans so that we can
build up a complete picture of what's planned for 17.05 and make sure there'
lab
and a lower level contribution for marketing purposes.
Tim
From: Matt Spencer [mailto:matt.spen...@arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 6:18 PM
To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Vincent JARDIN
; moving at dpdk.org
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] [dpdk-dev] Draft Project Charter
I
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: moving at dpdk.org
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-moving] Draft Project Charter
>
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for your draft, but it
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:41 PM
> To: users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim ; Hobywan Kenoby
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Lin
Hi HK,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hobywan Kenoby
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:24 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim ; dev at dpdk.org;
> users at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 9:19 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; O'Driscoll, Tim
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 17.02 Roadmap
>
> 2016-10-14 10:29, Stephen
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>
> Thanks Tim for the interesting inputs.
> Some of them may require a dedicated thread to continue the discussion
> based on some preliminary specifications or drafts.
Agreed. To avoid me acting as a middle man, I'm going to ask the
alternative exception path to KNI that does not
require out of tree drivers. This work is still at an experimental stage, so it
may not be included in 17.02.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wedn
This email is being sent on behalf of: Cavium, Cisco, Intel, NXP & Red Hat.
Since its creation as an open source project in 2013, DPDK has grown
significantly. The number of DPDK users, contributors, commercial products that
use DPDK and open source projects that depend on it have all increased
Below are the features that we're planning to submit for the 17.02 release.
We'll submit a patch to update the roadmap page with this info.
Some things will obviously change during planning/development, so we'll provide
a more detailed update in late September/early October. After that, things
lto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 12:25 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 16.11 Roadmap
>
> We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
> communicate our roadmap for future releases
We're delighted to announce that the DPDK Summit USA 2016 will be held on
August 10th & 11th at The Tech Museum of Innovation (http://www.thetech.org),
San Jose.
The DPDK Summit events provide an opportunity for the DPDK community to meet
face-to-face and discuss the future direction of the pro
We were a little late doing this for 16.07, so we're going to try and
communicate our roadmap for future releases earlier. Our aim is to do this 6
months before a release. Some things will obviously change during
planning/development, so we'll provide an update 4 months before the release.
Afte
At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide t
As we're nearing the completion of the 16.04 release, I'd like to let the
community know our plans for 16.07. It would be good if others are also willing
to share their plans so that we can build up a complete picture of what's
targeted for 16.07.
These are the features that we're planning to s
We're delighted to announce that the first event in our DPDK Summit series for
2016, for the China/Asia-Pacific region, will be held on Wednesday May 18th at
the Renaissance Shanghai Yangtze Hotel, Shanghai, China.
The DPDK community in the China/Asia-Pacific region will meet face-to-face at
th
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 3:15 PM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] call to join Linux Foundation
>
> After few meetings and emails, it has been agreed to
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Thanks very much f
Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> At the community call we held on governance in De
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 1:10 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] aesni_gcm: PMD to support AES_GCM crypto
> operations
>
> This patch provides the implementation of
At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few
of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight
governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events,
registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc.
Ste
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 8:14 PM
> To: Wiles, Keith
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling
>
> 2015-12-19 16:21, Wiles, Keith:
> > On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 7:23 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] version: 2.3.0-rc0
>
> On 12/18/15, 10:11 AM, "dev on
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: Scott Nicholas; mdolan at linuxfoundation.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> One of the actions resulting f
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:03 PM
> To: Vincent JARDIN; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] VFIO no-iommu
>
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 23:12 +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> > Thanks T
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:23 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling
>
> Hi all,
>
> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases.
> During 2015, w
n Wednesday and hopefully finalise it then.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 5:55 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposa
One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project governance
at the Userspace event was to engage with the Linux Foundation to see if they
can provide a lightweight model for DPDK. This would cover things like managing
a marketing budget, event planning, trademarks etc. Scott Ni
discuss with the LF and
arrange a time for this, before the holiday period if possible.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dp
I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:
When:
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:00 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:50:58PM
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:19 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Just curious about one item
> -Original Message-
> From: Hobywan Kenoby [mailto:hobywank at hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: 2.3 Roadmap
>
>
> Hi,
>
> CAT And CDP technologies look very intriguing...
As we're nearing the completion of the 2.2 release, I'd like to start a
discussion on plans for 2.3. To kick this off, below are the features that
we're hoping to submit for this release.
If others are prepared to contribute their plans, then we could build a
complete view of the release which
ing is:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101. Further details on the meeting
time in other timezones, and dial-in numbers for various countries are included
below.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent:
er 18, 2015 7:27 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
>
> Tim, et al,
> Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to discuss
> what support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for
> networ
want to make sure that we have agreement on the scope and purpose of the
board. We can address membership once we've finalized that.
Tim
> -----Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: A
There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.
We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a
good topic for a community call. This will give everybody
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Kathail [mailto:pkathail at cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 11:16 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Bagh Fares; Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen
> Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposa
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bagh Fares
> Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 6:03 PM
> To: Dave Neary; CHIOSI, MARGARET T; Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Pradeep Kathail (pkathail at cisco.com)
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:11 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10/30/2015
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 7:49 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Thanks Tim,
>
> Great to see some momen
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>
At the recent DPDK Userspace event we agreed that we need a body to make
technical decisions for the project. In Dublin we referred to this as a
Technical Steering Committee, but that term is often used on other projects to
describe a body with a more political charter. To avoid confusion, and
At the recent DPDK Userspace event in Dublin, Mohammad Abdul Awal gave a brief
talk on the Hyperscan pattern match software. We said at the time that it
wasn't open sourced yet but it would be soon. It's now available at:
https://01.org/hyperscan and https://github.com/01org/hyperscan.
Tim
We'd like to announce the release of the new DPDK project logo. Various
versions of the logo are available at: http://dpdk.org/about. This includes
horizontal and vertical versions, versions with and without Data Plane
Development Kit underneath, and versions suitable for a white or black
backg
Thanks to everybody who attended and provided input at last week's meeting. It
was a good, open discussion, and hopefully is the first step towards
structuring the DPDK project to facilitate its continued growth.
I've included a summary of the discussion below. Please feel free to provide
any a
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:44 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> 2015-09-09 12:56, O'Driscoll, Tim:
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 9:45 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 roadmap
>
> Hello,
>
> The new features for the release 2.2 must be first submitted before 2nd
>
Hi Neil,
There have been a few deprecation notices like this one submitted. Since you
drove the ABI policy, it would be good to get confirmation from you that these
are compliant with the policy and that you don't see any issues. Ideally, it
would be great if you can review and ack them. If you
Those of you who have looked at the website for the event
(https://dpdksummit.com/us/en/userspace2015) will have seen that we're planning
to have 3 different types of presentations:
Standard presentation sessions:
- Scheduled for both Thursday and Friday mornings.
- Opportunity to present on a t
This is just a reminder that on August 17 the DPDK open source community will
gather in San Francisco for the 2nd annual DPDK Summit. It's a one day event
where the community will share some of their developments, applications, and
usage of DPDK. The event will include talks from HP, IBM Asper
> -Original Message-
> From: announce [mailto:announce-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:30 AM
> To: announce at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-announce] important design choices - statistics - ABI
>
> Hi all,
>
> During the development of
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey (agh)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:10 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Wang, Liang-min
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethtool: add new library to provide
> ethtool-alike
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:15 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> rte_mbuf
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> +CC Neil
>
> On 06/0
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-05-19 11:34, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:43:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > > Composition of the TSC should reflect co
There wasn't any public response to this but we did discuss it with several
people separately who all thought it was a good idea. Therefore, we've decided
to go ahead with it. Siobhan is working on the plan now and should be in a
position to make a formal announcement in a few weeks.
In the mea
At Tuesday's Beyond DPDK 2.0 call, one topic we discussed was decision making
and whether we need a Technical Steering Committee (TSC). As a follow-up to
that discussion, I'd like to propose that we create a TSC for DPDK to guide the
long-term strategic direction of the project.
Justification
rests of having some more focussed discussion, I have some
> questions on the notes to get beyond passive voice. I think it will be
> useful to have concrete proposals and understand the positions of
> various entities participating in the project (both individuals and
> companies).
>
on the mailing list, and
possibly schedule a follow-up call in 2-3 weeks.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Commu
representation as possible from DPDK
contributors and users, so that the discussion reflects the views and needs of
the community.
Tim
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
>
> > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> >
> > Whe
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
