> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal > > Hi Tim, > > 2015-10-29 15:21, O'Driscoll, Tim: > > Scope > > ----- > > Issues that are within the scope of the Architecture Board include: > > - Project scope/charter. What is and isn't within the scope of the > project? What happens if somebody wants to upstream a new > library/capability and it's not clear whether it fits within DPDK or > not? As a random example, if somebody wanted to upstream a DPDK-enabled > TCP/IP stack to dpdk.org, should that be accepted or rejected? > > Do you mean the scope of this board would be about the whole projects > hosted > on dpdk.org (http://dpdk.org/browse/) or only the DPDK > (http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk)? > > Using your TCP stack example, I think it should be hosted on dpdk.org > but it may be out of the scope of the DPDK tree.
Good question. I think the scope should be just the DPDK project.
