> From: Vincent JARDIN [mailto:vincent.jar...@6wind.com] > > Le 15/03/2017 à 11:55, Thomas Monjalon a écrit : > >> I'd suggest that this is a good topic for the next Tech Board > meeting. > > I agree Tim. > > CC'ing techboard to add this item to the agenda of the next meeting. > > Frankly, I disagree, it is missing some discussions on the list.
I think the discussion on the mailing list is at an impasse and it won't be resolved there. I think the Tech Board needs to consider several issues: - What are the requirements for a new PMD to be accepted? For example, you're asking for performance data in this case, when this hasn't been a requirement for other PMDs. - Should there be different requirements for PMDs for virtual devices versus physical devices? - Based on these criteria, should the AVP PMD be accepted or not?
