1. There's no bug in it.
If you want to unblock libmspack and get that into buster, that's fine, and
1.9-1 is compatible with that. There's no need to do anything to
cabextract in buster due to the mspack bug.
Eric Sharkey
FYI : The build did succeed for several platform but unfortunately failed for
amd64 :-(
- Mail original -
> De: "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort"
> À: "eric valette" , 913...@bugs.debian.org, "Mattia
> Rizzolo"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Novembre 2018 10:48
to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
- Mail original -
> De: "Mattia Rizzolo"
> À: "eric valette" , 913...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Novembre 2018 10:09:45
> Objet: Re: Bug#913069: python-uno is also mising in the transition page
>
> On Wed, Nov 2
Currently installing 3.7 removes part of libreoffice due to python-uno.
It is the single package not rebuild yet on my system.
-- eric
Sorry for the delay, I'm happy to prepare a p-u upload this weekend.
--
Eric Dorland
43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
sic "Catch 22" scenario.
>
> The bug was introduced in gnustep-gui/0.25.0-1 during the migration to
> modern debhelper but was not really visible before the removal of the
> .symbols files in 0.25.0-4 (the shlibs were unused until then).
>
> We'll need a sourceful u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libp11-openssl1.1
This is a new package which is adds only pkcs11 engine support for openssl 1.1.
Without this the change it can't be used with openssl 1.1 only with
Le 06/07/2016 à 22:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 06/07/16 13:35, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
New upstream gnustep-gui/back bumps SONAME (change of ABI without change
in API)
, so we need to transition.
Now with gnustep-gui/back 0.25.0 in experimental,
we can start transition the
f only the warning due to
deprecated features.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150623214517.gb1...@cooper-siegel.org
er information (build logs etc.) available about the
MISSING packages?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150618150644.gw8...@cooper-siegel.org
ython-boto-2.33.0/boto/datapipeline/layer1.py \
-xpython-boto-2.33.0/boto/directconnect/exceptions.py \
-xpython-boto-2.33.0/boto/directconnect/layer1.py \
-xpython-boto-2.33.0/boto/logs/layer1.py
--
Eric Evans
eev...@debian.org
--- python-boto-2.33.0/boto/cloudtrai
package is ready and available on the Debian Med SVN. I asked
Andreas to take a look to my (debian) code. There is just a problem with
the watch file as it uses qa.d.o sf.php that is not up-to-date.
On a sid pbuilder (with a manually installed libquazip) all goes fine
and lintian looks happy of the
0 release (end 2014).
Thank you pointing out, previously ignored, non-free JS file. And thanks
a lot for giving me the opportunity to provide, as quickly as possible,
a new freemedforms-project source code.
--
Eric Maeker, Debian Med
GPG: C217 B1B7 80E8 0381 FD5B C3A5 75D4 AE85 B952 0933
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove libnbio from jessie/sid. It's dead upstream, there are no
packages depending on it, the maintainer is retiring, it has a low popcon,
etc., etc.
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
me delay to make deployment tests.
How many time can you wait for a patch?
--
Eric Maeker
GPG: C217 B1B7 80E8 0381 FD5B C3A5 75D4 AE85 B952 0933
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ed in conflict with
> DFSG. As I said: I have the impression that these *.js files are not
> needed in the binary package anyway. So why not simply removing them?
lintian warns about the freemedforms-project source package, how can I
remove file from this package? Should I provide a new upstream
Le 27/08/2014 00:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 14/08/14 07:46, Eric Maeker wrote:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> Version 0.7-2 was uploaded by Andreas and correct the headers package name.
>> See the new queue please.
>>
>> I'll make some ultima
t;
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:21:44PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 10/08/14 10:13, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> Le 1 août 2014 à 10:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>>
>>>>> I'll ping you
>>>>> back for a review of the
eaders.install files.
All goes fine with a pbuilder sid base with the 0.7-2.
Thanks for your help
--
Eric Maeker, Debian Med
GPG: C217 B1B7 80E8 0381 FD5B C3A5 75D4 AE85 B952 0933
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 1 août 2014 à 10:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> I'll ping you
>> back for a review of the code.
>
> Great, let me know when that's ready. The sooner, the better.
Thanks to Andreas, the new package is uploaded with all corrections done.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libquazip_0.
Le 27/07/2014 13:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 26/07/14 22:31, Eric Maeker wrote:
>> Le 26/07/2014 15:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> On 26/07/14 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> So I suggest you do the following:
>>>
>>&
d.
> Emilio
Thanks you for your help.
--
Eric Maeker
GPG: C217 B1B7 80E8 0381 FD5B C3A5 75D4 AE85 B952 0933
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 18 juil. 2014 à 01:01, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 23:35:55 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
>
>> Le 17/07/2014 19:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> May I ask why the -dev package is versioned, instead of simply being
>>> libquazi
e name. This is also a
recommandation I've found in the documentation of shared libraries
packaging.
> Can you fix freemedforms-project to build-depend on libquazip-dev or
> libquazip1-dev?
Fixed on the debian med svn.
--
Eric Maeker
GPG: C217 B1B7 80E8 0381 FD5B C3A5 75D4 AE85 B952 0933
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ase-/>
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b92c57.9070...@free.fr
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 4:50, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
> >
> This one is calling autoreconf in debian/rules w/o --install (or
> --force), and as such will miss needed scripts at build time.
>
>
> I don't see any problem with automake here, just upstream or packaging
> problems.
Thanks for the analysis Guillem.
--
Eric Dorland
IC
rsion
of automake might be a better bet. If people don't like this current
scheme we can discuss if the current scheme is a bad idea.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 719520 patch
thanks
[ Cyril Brulebois ]
> Eric Evans (2013-08-12):
> > In python-coherence, coherence.upnp.core.utils.HeaderAwareHTTPClientFactory
> > (coherence/upnp/core/utils.py) sub-classes twisted.web.client.HTTPDownloader
> > (from package python-twisted-web
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Eric Evans
eev...@sym-link.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
This is already correctes in the 0.9.0beta1-2 source package.
Éric
Le 13 juil. 2013 à 13:45, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu freemedforms-project_0.9.0~beta1-1 . amd64 . exper
archive files
- Copyright (C) 2011 Eric C. Cooper
+ Copyright (C) 2012 Eric C. Cooper
Released under the GNU General Public License *)
open Printf
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
| Cache { file = file; tmp_file = tmp_file; chan = chan } ->
debug_message " close cache %s"
* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> not sure you got that mail (at least M-F-T said you didn't want a copy):
>
> Adam D. Barratt (31/07/2012):
> > On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.
Proposed stable update for automake1.7.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
--- automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
+++ automake1.7-1.7.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+automake1.7 (1.7.9-9.1
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
>
> This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
>
> +automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -u automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
--- automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
+++ automake1.9-1.9.6+nogfdl/Makefile.in
@@ -408,7 +408,8
Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog
--- automake1.10-1.10.3/debian/changelog 2010-02-22 00:31:55.0 -0500
+++ automake1.10-1.10.3/debian
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 00:32 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Sorry Jonathan, due to some personal commitments and the flu I haven't
> > gotten to this yet. But I'll prepare these by the end of the week.
>
> It ap
so please unblock these packages.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The -dev
package is missing a dependency that makes building against the
library impossible. The changelog could have been clearer and I could
have filed a bug, but I was lazy. Can you please remove the urgency
override?
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
w pending a OK from the Release Team first,
> > > you should get in touch with them to see whether it's OK to have the
> > > new automake in unstable.
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> we're struggling with a bunch of uncoordinated transitions at the
> moment, with ext
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 05:23:59PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Alternatively, I can add a one-line patch to 4.5-1 that simply denies
> requests for InRelease files (forcing the clients to fall back to
> Release + Release.gpg files).
I have gone ahead with this approach; here is the patc
it has a number of other changes
since 4.5-1.
Alternatively, I can add a one-line patch to 4.5-1 that simply denies
requests for InRelease files (forcing the clients to fall back to
Release + Release.gpg files).
Please advise whether either of these would be acceptable.
--
Eric Cooper
ow to reproduce it, could you please try to do so with 2.0.14-2
> and confirm whether it's already been fixed?
>
> Relatedly, the BTS still thinks #567926 affects 2.0.14-2 (because the
> changelog
> for that version neither includes the NMU entry nor re-closes the bug),
the "historical revisionism" was warranted.
Thanks for the unblock.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Version 4.5-1 of approx, which I just uploaded to DELAYED/1, fixes two
important bugs (#589937 and #593428). Each fix is only one line.
Please consider allowing it into testing during the freeze. Thank you.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
either, and I
now see that it is installing install-info anyway. Sorry for the noise.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
gt; observed a DoS). I recently reported the issue to Werner Koch and he
> found a memory leak and fixed the issue. It seems the patch applies to
> gnupg (probably to 1.4.6 in oldstable too) as well as gnupg2.
>
> Should this be fixed in stable and olstable? Then I would prepare the
>
still isn't correct. Using new splashy with old
desktop-base or vice versa will still give errors, so ideally splashy
and desktop-base would Conflict: with each other's old versions.
Also, both packages need to be migrated to lenny at the same time.
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hello release gurus,
Could you unblock iceweasel to let in 3.0.3-2, which fixes several
security issues and a branding issue?
* Noèl Köthe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello Eric and Mike,
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceweasel.html
>
> iceweasel needs a request on deb
ut to check for phising. Has anyone actually observed this?
PS thanks for all the great work on xulrunner.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ix #496625 (severity serious) is trivial, but the resulting
package differs very little from what is currently in unstable.
I've attached diffs of 1.5~snap080222-1 to 1.5-2, and 1.5~snap080222-1
to a 1.5~snap080222-2 with backported fixes, (sans generated files).
Thanks,
--
Eric Evans
[EMAIL
only possible since very recently (changelog of OpenJDK says
since last Wednesday), my window of opportunity was hence very short and
I'm only short by one day...
Thanks, Eric
Original Message
Subject: freemind_0.7.1-7_i386.changes i
x27;s "best
practices".
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
*SKIP*
> OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> habit ?
OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by
habit?
--
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
--
To U
newer release of util-linux (2.13-8) is into testing,
sparc-utils could be in as well.
Best regards.
Eric.
--
Eric Delaunay | Le travail est trop sérieux pour le confier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | à ceux qui veulent se tuer avec.Jissey.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > I have a few minor fixes in packa
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> > that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in
> > the next release.
rk with emacs22. I'm a heavy user of this so tested
very well. Low risk.
sqlfairy 0.07-4 -> 0.07-5
Small fix for some broken argument variables. Very low risk.
And FYI there will probably be new security fix upstream releases for
gnupg2 and iceweasel within the week.
--
Eric Dorland <
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:05:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Bro
th that
> work, so that we can get a releasable version of iceweasel into
> testing soon. If time allows, you can propose a new packages with
> reorganized/added patches at a later point, but right now, I would like
> to get big pieces like iceweasel finally ready for release.
I'll
certainly.
>
> Hopefully these updates won't have the problem of past mozilla
> new-upstream-version "security" fixes, where every single file shows up in
> the diff because of cvs keywords?
I don't think every single file will, but yes, there are a bunch of
w version late tonight at the
latest.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Eric Dorland wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey
<[EM
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnan
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debian[0].
> >
> > [0] Their plan, whi
* Artur R. Czechowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:11:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > automake1.4: This is the old school package, that's been completely
> > unsupported for a number of years (since 2002). It certainly not used
ED]>
fwbuilder
libfwbuilder
libgcgi
Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
anjuta
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gato
Rune B. Broberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tuxtype
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fluidsynth
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTEC
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >>Eric Dorland wrote:
> [...]
> >>I've uploaded a fixed package of mozilla-firefox-locale-all yesterday...
> >> Apparantly all the d
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi
>
> > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=firefox
> > firefox is ready to go into testing, except it's blocking on a bunch
> > of translation pa
Hello,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=firefox
firefox is ready to go into testing, except it's blocking on a bunch
of translation packages that have been updated and renamed themselves
already for the most part.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ
ib, mlgtk,
> ocamldsort, pycaml, spamoracle, syslog-ocaml.
syslog-ocaml has been updated in SVN to generate debian/control from
debian/control.in, so it just needs a sponsored upload.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
: To compile with Borland TASM 3.1. In case that assembler
> > is still
> > available, is it free software? Don't you need to run DOS to use it?
>
> The main point is, do we ship it as part of the installer stuff, knowing it is
> needed to boot, or even worse in the case of miboot, it needs to be built into
> the images.
>
> The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions in the
> boot sector, which have not been changed since over 10 years probably, and
> probably nobody at appple even remembers them, and thus we are not shipping
> miboot even in non-free, while at the same time distributing it from
> people.debian.org.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
I have used miBoot on a nubus ppc mac (6116cd) and it is not the
optimal solution. My suggestion as a user is that you forget about
using miBoot at all, and foster development for a new GPL'ed
bootloader based on EMILE. Laurent (EMILE author) has said it is a
matter of limited time that EMILE is not written to support ppc. Focus
on EMILE for 68k and nubus ppc.
Eric
ssion.
Let's continue it in the debian-policy mailing list.
I suggest that every Debian Stepper reply to Ola's post in debian-policy
(or to my first post in debian-policy if you prefer).
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nt. But not until at least
> the middle of next month.
Thanks. You are welcome.
But, do you really think there is something you can do ?
Eric
PS
I suggest to not continue this thread in debian-release mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek a écrit :
>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>I think the FHS itself is clear on this point, that /opt is only for use by
>third-party software bundles.
>
>
>
FHS 2.3 says add-on and not third-pa
be removed from Debian ?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alright, after a false start with 1.0.4-1, -2 has finished building on
m68k and is ready for inclusion in testing. 1.0.4 is security
fix release, no new features.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0
t into sarge, you might consider approx as a migration path for
otherwise-orphaned users of apt-proxy v1 (that was my original
motivation for writing it).
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:23:36AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Although not reported as a bug, openct 0.6.2 (the version in testing)
> > needed a soname bump but didn't get it. 0.6.4 fixes that problem, and
&
Although not reported as a bug, openct 0.6.2 (the version in testing)
needed a soname bump but didn't get it. 0.6.4 fixes that problem, and
since opensc and openct are somewhat codependent, the latest version
of it should go in as well.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138
Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built
on arm)
gnustep
On 2005-01-05 19:00:24 +0100 Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Hi,
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a
.
Please, is it possible to push them in sarge ?
Eric
P.S.
The full list of packages that should be pushed into sarge:
gworkspace
addresses-for-gnustep
gnumail
gnustep-examples
meta-gnustep
aclock.app
agenda.app
camera.app
cenon.app
charmap.app
connect.app
cynthiune.app
Eric Valette wrote:
The only release-relevant thing I can see here is that it's not a
release-critical bug. Thank you for bringing it to my attention so that
I could downgrade it. :-)
(The grave severity implies the package is unusable, which libc6-dev
isn't; it doesn't seem to
he desired
behavior :-)
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. 6 rue Paul Le Flem
(___, / (_(_(__ 35740 Pace
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of history and the fact that NPTL is not availiable on all
processors) of why NPTL is not used also in static mode.
Proposal to enhance things are attached in the bug report. Comments are
welcome.
Have a nice day,
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _.
I tried the 1.1.2-5 incarnation tonight : color selection works as expected.
Thanks for the good work.
-- eric
Jim Watson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:04:46PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
I am not sure this is a bug? I can reproduce such behaviour with my upstream
build but the behaviour seems "normal" to me. When text is selected so the text
box container is also selected and formats a
1) this is an important package
2) with a bug that makes it hardly usable to make any decent
presentation, CV, ...
-- eric
st on testing and sid/unstable. If it still breaks, it
means an unrelated chnage (compiler, librairies, ...),
4) if it works reload 1.1.2-5 ASAP...
Then start thinking about the printing problem. As you know 1.1.3-rc is
already there...
--
__
/ ` Eric
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Eric Valette wrote:
No. There is color (and just color) formatting bugs and for the "normal"
formatting you still could use the buttons. I agree that this is a really
annoying bug and this somehow needs to be fixed but it does not render
_the whole ap
Surely not tested enough... I hope it is just a problem with development
environment.
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. 6 rue Paul Le Flem
(___, / (_(_(__ 35740 Pace
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:11:55AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Ok, looking again at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=mozilla-firefox there
> > seems to be a few more issues.
>
> > It appears that mo
a version in
unstable, so it's probably quite safe to remove.
Thanks gentlemen. (and ladies).
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:37:53PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > If you take a look at
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?
nd on the version of binutils in
unstable. I thought the testing scripts did not consider the
build-depends, but if they do that could pose a problem as well.
Could any release/ftp-masters take care of the first issue, and
someone enlighten me to the second. Thanks.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL P
bug
> against ftp.d.o for removal, and it'll be removed. That's the best way
> to do it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-
Eric Valette wrote:
But if this would be the problem, reverting the Debian package to Gtk
1 might cause serious problems in other packages like e.g.
epiphany-browser.
Having mozilla packages almost unuseable for serious mail/news acitivity
is *also* a serious problem : CTRL-ALT-*** not
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
