* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: > Hi, > > I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working > on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate > use of the Urgency field: > > * Urgency high to beat the freeze. > > As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at > various points before that) if you have serious concerns that > important updates to your package won't be included in the release, > the correct approach is to talk to us, not try and work around us. > The net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency > will be overriden on the britney side as if the package had been > uploaded with a lower urgency.
It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev package is missing a dependency that makes building against the library impossible. The changelog could have been clearer and I could have filed a bug, but I was lazy. Can you please remove the urgency override? -- Eric Dorland <e...@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
