On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:53:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:04:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Would it be meaningfull to include approx and syslog-ocaml in sarge ? The > > only > > reason they didn't make it before the freeze was that i was travelling and > > didn't detect that syslog-ocaml was mishandling the non-native arches case. > > > I have been using approx for over two month now daily, and it works fine, > > and > > as said, it is not a package that has any reverse-dependencies or something. > > > The only remaining problem is for the m68k autobuilder to pick up the > > syslog-ocaml build, and the m68k, mips and ia64 autobuilders to pick up the > > approx builds, which should hopefully happen any day now. > > Sarge is now closed for new packages. These are simply too low of a > priority, and there are too many other demands on the release team's time -- > particularly, the RC bug count which isn't dropping fast enough.
I can't argue with that, but in the event that apt-proxy v2 doesn't make it into sarge, you might consider approx as a migration path for otherwise-orphaned users of apt-proxy v1 (that was my original motivation for writing it). -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
