* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now > > that while not release critical, I think would be helpful to have in > > the next release. I've attached patches below for ease of reviewing. > > > automake 1:1.4-p6-11 -> 1:1.4-p6-12 > > > This just removes the provides of automake, since we're moving away > > from supporting automake 1.4, and also adds a versioned conflict on > > automake, which allows automake1.4 and the new automake package be > > able to be installed at the same time, which would be good. Low risk. > > Four packages in testing build-depend on automake[1]. Do you know which > version they build with? > > Granted, the current situation means that the resolution of the build-dep > may be non-deterministic; but it might instead be deterministic but > non-obvious, in which case this change would introduce 4 RC bugs...
Well don't the buildds and other tools always prefer a real package over a Provides? > > automake1.8 1.8.5+nogfdl-1 -> 1.8.5+nogfdl-2 > > > Remove a doc-base file which removes an annoying warning at install > > time. Very low risk. > > Unblocked. > > > opensc 0.11.1-2 -> 0.11.1-3 > > > Biggest fix here is to put the mozilla-signer plugin in the right > > place. Also some documentation and path fix. Low risk. > > Unblocked. > > > post-el 2004.07.23-3 -> 2004.07.23-5 > > > Fixes to make it work with emacs22. I'm a heavy user of this so tested > > very well. Low risk. > > emacs22 isn't in etch; not reviewed. Ah, good point. > > sqlfairy 0.07-4 -> 0.07-5 > > > Small fix for some broken argument variables. Very low risk. > > Unblocked. > > Thanks, No, thank you :) -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
