Re: 2utf got no maintainer

1999-12-26 Thread Richard Braakman
Package: ftp.debian.org I'm filing this as a reminder. Richard Braakman On Sun, Dec 26, 1999 at 08:50:45PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 03:41:38AM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote: > > [ Please CC me as I'm not subscribed ] > > > > The package 2utf has 2 outstanding bug repor

Bug#49438: marked as done (xinetd: netstd is now a dummy package, please depend on the individual packages you need)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#49398: marked as done (netstd is now a dummy package, please recommend the individual packages you need)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#46603: marked as done (netbase: Cannot setup with xinetd installed)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#46572: marked as done (netbase: netbase: can't upgrade when xinetd installed)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#45602: marked as done (Netbase don't start inetd if /etc/init.d/inetd doesn't exist)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#44537: marked as done (xinetd: Was deinstalled, and won't reinstall because of broken dependencies)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#44529: marked as done (xinetd: I can't install xinetd)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#44099: marked as done (xinetd copyright file does not show where downloaded from)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#43161: marked as done (xinetd: obsolete /etc/init.d/netbase script included?)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#41568: marked as done ([Liviu.Daia@imar.ro: Re: limiting IP connections])

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#41386: marked as done (Request for updated xinetd)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#38361: marked as done (xinetd: xinetd.conf doesn't accept only_from = localnet)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#37134: marked as done (xinetd: /etc/init.d/xinetd can't find portmap)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#36809: marked as done (xinetd: purging does not remove /etc/xinetd.conf)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#35166: marked as done (xinetd SD1 patch (security fixes and new features))

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#31500: marked as done (xinetd: wrong sequence code for links in /etc/rc?.d)

1999-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Re: 2utf got no maintainer

1999-12-26 Thread Bart Schuller
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 03:41:38AM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote: > [ Please CC me as I'm not subscribed ] > > The package 2utf has 2 outstanding bug reports, one of them claims > that the package is unusable. Having contacted the 'package > maintainer' he said that he will no longer maintain any Debi

2utf got no maintainer

1999-12-26 Thread Anthony Wong
[ Please CC me as I'm not subscribed ] The package 2utf has 2 outstanding bug reports, one of them claims that the package is unusable. Having contacted the 'package maintainer' he said that he will no longer maintain any Debian packages any more (he probably meant that he has resigned). The QA te