Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 1999 15:12:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 13455 invoked from network); 7 Sep 1999 15:12:42 -0000
Received: from oxygene.terra.vein.hu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 1999 15:12:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 8418 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Sep 1999 15:12:37 -0000
Date: 7 Sep 1999 15:12:37 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xinetd: I can't install xinetd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
Severity: normal
I can't install xinetd :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install xinetd
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
xinetd: Depends: netbase but it is not installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
However, netbase is installed so I don't know what apt-get complains about.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux oxygene 2.2.12 #6 Thu Aug 26 12:00:39 CEST 1999 i586
unknown
Versions of the packages xinetd depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-0pre12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii netbase 3.16-2 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
--- Begin /etc/init.d/xinetd (modified conffile)
#!/bin/sh
#
if [ -f /sbin/portmap ];then
PORTMAP=/sbin/portmap
else
echo "Could not find portmapper, please manually edit $0, and"
echo "report this as a bug."
exit 0
fi
test -f /usr/sbin/xinetd || exit 0
case "$1" in
start)
echo -n "Starting base networking daemons: "
echo -n "portmap " ; start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec $PORTMAP
echo -n "xinetd " ; start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec
/usr/sbin/xinetd
echo
;;
stop)
echo -n "Stopping base networking daemons: "
echo -n "xinetd " ; start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --signal
3 --exec /usr/sbin/xinetd
echo -n "portmap " ; start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --exec
$PORTMAP
echo
killall -9 slattach 2>/dev/null || exit 0
;;
reload|force-reload)
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --name xinetd --signal 10
--exec /usr/sbin/xinetd
;;
restart)
echo -n "Stopping base networking daemons: "
echo -n "xinetd " ; start-stop-daemon --stop --signal 3 --quiet
--oknodo --exec /usr/sbin/xinetd
pmap_dump >/var/run/portmap.state
echo -n "$PORTMAP " ; start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --exec
$PORTMAP
echo
echo -n "Starting base networking daemons: "
echo -n "$PORTMAP " ; start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec $PORTMAP
if [ -f /var/run/portmap.upgrade-state ]; then
pmap_set </var/run/portmap.upgrade-state
elif [ -f /var/run/portmap.state ]; then
pmap_set </var/run/portmap.state
fi
rm -f /var/run/portmap.upgrade-state /var/run/portmap.state
echo -n "xinetd" ; start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec
/usr/sbin/xinetd
echo
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop|reload|restart|force-reload}"
exit 1
;;
esac
exit 0
--- End /etc/init.d/xinetd
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44529-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
