Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 1999 01:26:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 7559 invoked from network); 4 Sep 1999 01:26:45 -0000
Received: from mill.adm.by.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 1999 01:26:45 -0000
Received: from www2.3dresearch.com (by.net) [209.195.180.7] (whig)
by mill.adm.by.net with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
id 11N4bC-0003hY-00 (Debian); Fri, 03 Sep 1999 21:26:34 -0400
Sender: whig
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 01:26:34 +0000
From: Mike Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xinetd copyright file does not show where downloaded from
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
Severity: important
>From debian-policy:
In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
(if any) were obtained, and explain briefly what modifications were
made in the Debian version of the package compared to the upstream
one. It must name the original authors of the package and the
Debian
maintainer(s) who were involved with its creation.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
