Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 1999 21:15:54 +0000
Received: (qmail 11957 invoked from network); 5 Jan 1999 21:15:54 -0000
Received: from laxos.informatik.uni-rostock.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 1999 21:15:54 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by laxos.informatik.uni-rostock.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) id
WAA01165;
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 22:15:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 22:15:46 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xinetd: wrong sequence code for links in /etc/rc?.d
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
During installation xinetd diverts /etc/init.d/netbase, which starts
portmap and inetd using a sequence code of 18. /etc/init.d/xinetd is
installed using a sequence code of 20. This leads to the situation,
that the portmapper (required e.g. by ypbind) is started to late
(e.g. after ypbind, which results in
ypbind[2576]: Unable to register (YPBINDPROG, YPBINDVERS, udp).).
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux laxos 2.0.36 #3 Tue Jan 5 19:58:10 MET 1999 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages xinetd depends on:
ii libc6 2.0.7v-1 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii libc6 2.0.7v-1 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii netbase 3.11-1.2 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 31500-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
