Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 1999 14:19:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 8640 invoked from network); 26 May 1999 14:19:40 -0000
Received: from s6n196.hfx.andara.com (HELO eden.edennet) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 May 1999 14:19:40 -0000
Received: from synrg by eden.edennet with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10meWq-0000HA-00; Wed, 26 May 1999 11:19:32 -0300
From: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xinetd: xinetd.conf doesn't accept only_from = localnet
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 11:19:32 -0300
Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
I tried restricting some services to 'local access only' by placing the
following parameter under those services (e.g. login, finger, amanda)
in xinetd.conf:
only_from = localnet
localnet is defined in /etc/networks as follows:
localnet 10.7.7.0
xinetd denies me access to the services I set up this way.
However, if I change 'only_from' as follows:
only_from = 10.7.7.0
then xinetd will allow access to the services.
The xinetd.conf man page says that any network name specified in
/etc/networks may be used. However, it seems that this feature is broken
in the current release of xinetd.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux eden 2.2.9 #1 Tue May 18 14:04:51 ADT 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages xinetd depends on:
ii libc6 2.0.7.19981211 GNU C Library: shared libraries
ii libc6 2.0.7.19981211 GNU C Library: shared libraries
ii netbase 3.11-1.2 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 38361-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
