Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 1999 17:29:32 +0000
Received: (qmail 28077 invoked from network); 7 Sep 1999 17:29:31 -0000
Received: from legolas.mdh.se ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 1999 17:29:31 -0000
Received: from dat95pkn.campus.mdh.se (dat95pkn.campus.mdh.se [10.10.247.110])
        by legolas.mdh.se (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA12887;
        Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:29:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by dat95pkn.campus.mdh.se (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 7 Sep 1999 
19:29:27 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 19:29:27 +0200
From: peter karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xinetd: Was deinstalled, and won't reinstall because of broken 
dependencies
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.2

Package: xinetd
Version: 2.2.1-8
Severity: important

I had xinetd installed, but somewhere, somehow, it was deinstalled and
replaced with inetd (without asking me, which sucks). I can only assume it
was because of this:

# apt-get install xinetd
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xinetd: Depends: netbase but it is not installed
E: Sorry, broken packages

# apt-get install netbase
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, netbase is already the newest version
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux dat95pkn 2.0.38 #1 tor aug 26 11:32:30 CEST 1999 i586 
unknown

Versions of the packages xinetd depends on:
ii  libc6           2.1.2-0pre12   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii  netbase         3.16-2         Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44537-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
        Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i

Hi people, 

All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.

In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.

Thanks for reporting...

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

Reply via email to