Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 1999 17:18:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 10469 invoked from network); 20 Sep 1999 17:18:28 -0000
Received: from rd1936.quicknet.nl (@195.66.31.144)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 1999 17:18:28 -0000
Received: by rd1936.quicknet.nl
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:18:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netbase don't start inetd if /etc/init.d/inetd doesn't exist
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: netbase
Version: 3.16-2
I just upgraded netbase together with xinetd, which now diverts
/etc/init.d/inetd to /etc/init.d/inetd.real, so that inetd isn't started
at boot time. But netbase's prerm and postinst want to call
/etc/init.d/inetd, which fails because it doesn't exist. This causes
netbase's configuration to fail, which leaves the package in the
'unconfigured' state.
Please add some code to test if /etc/init.d/inetd exists before calling
it.
Remco
--
rd1936: 7:05pm up 9 days, 20:21, 7 users, load average: 1.49, 1.53, 1.47
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45602-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
