Your message dated Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 1999 21:37:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 15613 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1999 21:33:06 -0000
Received: from mail.via.net (209.81.9.4)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 1999 21:33:06 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.81.29.202] (HELO
one.willcodeforfood.via.net)
by mail.via.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) via ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 6 Nov 1999 13:32:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaleh by one.willcodeforfood.via.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1
(Debian))
id 11kDSB-0005rz-00; Sat, 06 Nov 1999 13:32:55 -0800
From: Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netstd is now a dummy package, please recommend the individual
packages you need
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.40
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.40
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 13:32:55 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: xinetd
Version: N/A; reported 1999-11-06
Severity: normal
netstd has been broken into smaller packages. netstd itself is a dummy package
which depends on these pieces. Declaring a depends on netstd forces one to
install bits a sysadmin may not need or want. Also, netstd will remove other
daemons in favor of its own.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux one 2.2.13 #1 Sun Oct 24 20:17:34 PDT 1999 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 49398-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 30109 invoked from network); 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Dec 1999 19:46:27 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id UAA01751;
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:46:22 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: latest xinetd Debian package (2.1.8.7) fixes these problems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
Hi people,
All these problems you reported against Debian xinetd package
are fixed now. Please upgrade, if you can.
In case you wondered, the bugs haven't been closed until now because the
package maintainer wasn't around, and the package is in fact orphaned. I am
doing this as a member of the quality assurance group.
Thanks for reporting...
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
