tags 258305 pending
thanks
Quoting KÄstutis BiliÅnas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Version: 1.6.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 258305 pending
Bug#258305: discover1: updated Lithuanian translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:22:18PM +0800, John wrote:
> As not-root I did this:
> apt-get -b source debian-installer
>
> As root I installed the build-deps and then as not-root:
> cd debian-installer-20040701
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc
>
> The build failed in this manner:
>
> Reading Pac
reassign 257794 os-prober
retitle 257794 Does not detect a Fedora installation
thanks
> Problems:
> - Debian is listed twice: with/without kernel version
> - Suse is listed twice
> - Fedora not found
As joeyh mentioned, more information will help.
Anyway, I reassign this bug to the os detectio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 249322 grave
Bug#249322: Don't offer noexec option for /tmp
Bug#255135: debian-installer: Filesystem flags allow for install snafu
Bug#258117: noexec /tmp breaks base-config
Severity set to `grave'.
> reassign 258117 partman
Bug#258117: noexec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 257794 os-prober
Bug#257794: soubled suse and no fedora
Bug reassigned from package `grub-installer' to `os-prober'.
> retitle 257794 Does not detect a Fedora installation
Bug#257794: soubled suse and no fedora
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 253999 hotplug
Bug#253999: discover1: bad module locks system: discover just tries again at reboot
Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `hotplug'.
>
End of message,
Quoting Adam Thornton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have patches, but I don't know if I'm deriving the disk information
> the right way.
Maybe you already did this, but reporting this as a BR against
zipl-installer would probably help in keeping track of the patches.
My apologies if this was already
Quoting Roman S Dubtsov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello.
>
> I've recently decided to test "sarge" installer (namely
> 20040430/images/monolithic/2.6/mini.iso). I think that the "choose
> mirror" dialog has a usability issue: when I choose "enter
> information mannualy", installer tries to use htt
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> I want to suggest a feature which would make Debian the world's top
> distribution in that field.
>
> I'm talking about swap + root encryption. Especially root encryption is
FS encryption support was discussed during Debconf with a fe
As not-root I did this:
apt-get -b source debian-installer
As root I installed the build-deps and then as not-root:
cd debian-installer-20040701
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc
The build failed in this manner:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree...
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 07082004
uname -a: Linux Grundle 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 7-08-2004 22:00:00
Method: Network install from the download disk (link: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
Package: netcfg-dhcp
Version: 0.71
Severity: minor
This is just a reminder to myself that netcfg-dhcp's dhcp_retry
continues to offer to configure the network manually.
Fixing it would require changing the part of templates that said
'Configure the network manually' into its own template, unfuzzy
Hello.
I've recently decided to test "sarge" installer (namely
20040430/images/monolithic/2.6/mini.iso). I think that the "choose
mirror" dialog has a usability issue: when I choose "enter
information mannualy", installer tries to use http protocol by
default. I think that user should be able
Dear installer developer friends,
Deciding that there must be someway to dual boot sid/windows, I tried
the following at boot:
linux26 hd=7296,255,63
and linux26 hda=7296,255,63
Not wishing to have another go round with rewriting the partition table, I
double checked under "show cylinder, he
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_0.107_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
archdetect_0.107_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.107_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.107.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.107.dsc
ddetect_0.107.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.107.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.107_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.107_all.udeb
hw-det
ddetect_0.107_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.107.dsc
ddetect_0.107.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.107_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.107_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.107_all.udeb
archdetect_0.107_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UN
Just wanted to add that when i installed OS X,
i partitioned the disk then using the Mac tool.
40 GB for Darwin, and 109 GB unused.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lilo-installer
Version: 0.47
Severity: serious
If there is no /boot partition, lilo-installer fails when it calls
mapdevfs with no arguments.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040704
I used .../20040708/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
and booted with install-power4-2.6
I read somewhere that i should select then Sungem
NIC driver. That worked, because it reverse queried
my DNS for the hostname. BTW it put hostname.domainname
as the
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 16:51, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> s390
>
> Missing for release of s390: some fixes in zipl-installer, uploads of
> the other s390 specific packages.
I have patches, but I don't know if I'm deriving the disk information
the right way.
Adam
--- zipl-installer.pos
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: important
getting the following output from apt when attempting to use discover1:
Setting up discover1 (1.6.1) ...
Detecting hardware: via_ircc b44 snd-emu10k1 usb-uhci usb-uhci usb-uhci
ehci-hcdFATAL: Module via_ircc not found.
Skipping via_ircc module
I agree that configuring all interfaces would be nice. I have some
hardware on which I want to have dhcp done on all interfaces, and I'd
just as soon not even pick which to use, just use the first that DHCP'd.
Or maybe even use multiple interfaces with load balancing.
--
see shy jo
signature.as
Hello,
I want to suggest a feature which would make Debian the world's top
distribution in that field.
I'm talking about swap + root encryption. Especially root encryption is
not so easy to set up, so a lot of people don't use it and often even
ask questions like "but why would someone want to
Accepted:
tasksel_2.04.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.04.dsc
tasksel_2.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.04.tar.gz
tasksel_2.04_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.04_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 256774 257986
Thank you for your contribution
tasksel_2.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.04.dsc
tasksel_2.04.tar.gz
tasksel_2.04_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256774: fixed in tasksel 2.04
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257986: fixed in tasksel 2.04
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 258331 d-i
Bug#258331: base-installer: kernel choosing probably broken on m68k
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 257963 + pending
Bug#257963: entry for AMD-8111 USB support
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tag 258109 + pending
Bug#258109: netcfg-static: IUCV not detected as a point-to-point connection
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tag 258207 +
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_0.106_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
archdetect_0.106_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.106_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.106.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.106.dsc
ddetect_0.106.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.106.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.106_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.106_all.udeb
hw-det
ddetect_0.106_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.106.dsc
ddetect_0.106.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.106_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.106_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.106_all.udeb
archdetect_0.106_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UN
Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I can _guess_ that something apparently called a "Farallon SkyLINE" is a
wireless card (though that's not what the OEM put on the card's label),
but it'd be nicer if netcfg told me by putting "wireless" before the
card name. This should be easy to do, it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # s/apt-config/apt-setup/
> retitle 255651 base-config: apt-setup should ask for proxy if not configured
Bug#255651: base-config: apt-config should ask for proxy if not configured
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:52:12PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> conffiles.d/sarge:
> ispell.preinst xfree86-kbd.preinst
>
> conffiles.d/woody:
> ispell.postinst ktouch.postinst locale.preinstopera6.postinst
> xfree86-kbd.preinst kde2.postinstlinks.postinst
> ltsp-xfree86-
Package: base-installer
Severity: normal
Just from inspection of the debian/postinst file it appears that the m68k
kernel choosing code is incomplete, possibly as a stub, compared to other
archs'
i.e.
m68k)
case "$SUBARCH" in
amiga|atari|mac|bvme6000|mvme147|mvme16x|q40|sun3|sun3x)
Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Oh, I'm sorry. I really meant, that cyr should be called with -f instead
> of -t (as with Ukrainian). Sorry. Here comes right patch:
>
> === Cut ===
> --- /usr/sbin/termwrap2004-06-29 19:49:21.0 +0400
> +++ termwrap 2004-07-08 14:49:06.0 +0400
> @
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:51:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line well
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:53:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258310: sarge install fails: can't detect ide disks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 258316 cdrom-detect
Bug#258316: installation-reports (Installation Fail caused by CDrom drive)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdrom-detect'.
> tags
[Thanks to Christian Perrier for reviewing the minutes]
Minutes of #debian-boot Meeting of 2004.07.06.2000
Dates and times are UTC-referenced.
Meeting started at 2000.
There were 106 IRC nicknames present at #debian-boot at the start time.
The following people provided input to the meeting:
(a
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 06:33, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:27, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog
> > entry was unclear if it should or not.)
> >
> > The d-i i
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kbd-chooser_0.59_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.59.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.59.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.59.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.59.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.59_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.59_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 57383
Th
kbd-chooser_0.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.59.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.59.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.59_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:00:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Countrychooser bug log cleaning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:00:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Countrychooser bug log cleaning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
reassign 255689 discover-data
retitle 255689 discover-data: uses 'apm' XFree86 4.x driver for ATI Technologies Inc
Radeon Mobility U1
thanks
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> clone 255439 -1
> retitle -1 Wrong driver chosen for ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobilit
I'm sorry that I forgot to reply with my test results. This message
reminded me.
I re-tested using the latest Debian Installer build, and the problem is
now fixed. Everything works properly.
Congratulations - You are one of the very few distributions that deals
with this kind of network configu
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:45:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Snapshot 7.7.2004 Debian.org
uname -a:
Date: 8.7.2004 nightly :)
Method: Boot from Netinstall CD (111MB) Snapshot 7.7.04, Install from CDRom
Machine: Fujitsu Siemens OEM PC, 440BX Chipset (anno98)
Processor: 333Mhz P2 (Slot)
Memor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:38, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Environment: VmWare
> Platform : i386
> Kernel : 2.4
> Locale : fr_FR
> Image : netinst sid_d-i 20040707
> Priority : high
>
> Result : Error during base-installer : initrd
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
discover.init contains use of the XSI:isms `-a' and `-o' in tests.
This patch fixes this.
Rationale:
Policy 10.4
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html
Regards: David Weinehall
diff -ur discover1-1.6.1-old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 08 July 2004 20:59, Ryan wrote:
> Um, should I be concerned about the "sid" in that URL? I've read the
> 'sid' FAQ.
The new installer will be part of the new Debian Sarge release. The sid_d-i is
the most up-to-date version of the _insta
Package: installation
Version: sarge
I tried to install sarge from the hard-disk using a netboot install:
1. I've downloaded vmlinuz, initrd.gz and mini.iso from
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040430/images/netboot/
2. I've placed this files in c:\ (/dev/hda1)
3. I've
Looking more carfully, I see you did include the full partition layout,
so I only need the log files I asked for, and also the
/boot/grub/menu.lst that was generated by the installer.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Robert Jakubowski wrote:
> Problems:
> - Debian is listed twice: with/without kernel version
This was a bug in grub, it happened for a few days but seems to be
resolved now.
> - Suse is listed twice
> - Fedora not found
Please send me a copy of /var/log/debian-installer/syslog and
/var/log/debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 257794 soubled suse and no fedora
Bug#257794: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 257794 grub-installer
Bug#257794: soubled suse and no fedora
Bug r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 258117 partman
Bug#258117: install-report
Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `partman'.
> tags 258117 d-i
Bug#258117: install-report
There were no tags set.
Tags
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 23:16:04 -0500, ryan wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/boot-floppies/vanilla-3.0.23-netinst.iso
Are you just discovering disco, too?
Bahaha touche'. I didn't know that image was moldy. (I was
puzzled by the use of a 2.2.x kernel, how
Package: base-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
With this patch, base-installer will create the necessary ubd devices so
that UML can boot from the installed system. They are not created by
debootstrap or makedev by default, so they will not exist unless explicitly
created. Behaviour with
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hi,
Attached is updated Lithuanian translation of discover1.
Please apply this.
Thanks.
--
KÄstutis BiliÅnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
discover1_po_lt.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
signature.asc
Description: This
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:49:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Countries are sorted now (partially)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:39:11AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:12:54PM -0400, Ken Schweigert wrote:
> > On the reboot I received the following:
> > Configuring the base system ...
> > /usr/sbin/base-config: ./prep-menu: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
> > Confi
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:49:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Countries are sorted now (partially)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
severity 242782 wishlist
thanks
This suggestion will probably be for a further release. Moreover, as
this list has been shortened considerably with recent languagechooser
changes, I downgrade this bug to wishlist
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:44:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Presumed fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 258207 wishlist
Bug#258207: netcfg should check for validity of hostname given by the DHCP server.
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 242782 wishlist
Bug#242782: languagechooser: Give more hints about the way to navigate in the list
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
I've found a bug.. with this patch anna reinstalls some packages that
are already installed, including rootskel. This zeros /var/log/messages,
and the third virtual console stops displaying base-installer output and
etc (unless you're in low memory mode; then the tails are restarted).
--
see shy
Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Due to error in 'cyr' calling for KOI8-R encoding, no koi8-r fons is
> selected for installation, so if I select Russian language for
> installation, I can't read any of Russian messages (only fancy symbols
> with accents).
>
> Patch attached.
> --- termwrap 2004-07-08
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:17:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> >> These are both a little bit outdated. Can you try an initrd with the
>> >> lates
sylvain ferriol wrote:
> hello
> i will not be here next week, and i don't know if i have to commit this
> patch before RC1
> so i attach the patches for S10lowmem and anna.c file
>
> test it for other arches,
I noticed that anna's list of modules, displayed in very low memory mode
with this pat
Accepted:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.08_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.08_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.07.08.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257982: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:17:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257963: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08.tar.gz
discover1-data_1.2004.07.08_all.deb
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.08_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 258117 base-config
Bug#258117: install-report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:17:51PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> >> These are both a little bit outdated. Can you try an initrd with the
> >> latest versions?
> >>
> >> The images at http://debia
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:29:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:17:38PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:24AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > Pasi Kärkkäinen wro
Mattias Wadenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
>> Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
>>
>> >>From the initrd:
>> >
>> > Package: discover1-data-udeb
>> > Status: install ok unpacked
>> > Version: 1.2004.02.08-7
>> > Description: hardware lists for libdiscover
Craig Sampson wrote:
> One of the last installation screens is to determine where you would
> like to install grub. Choices are MBR or elsewhere. If you don't
> choose MBR then elsewhere is suggested as grub notation (hd0) or
> /dev/hda.
>
> This is a problem. Users unfamiliar with grub won't n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 258216 d-i
Bug#258216: cannot handle traditional device names
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 258216 grub-installer
Bug#258216: cannot handle traditional device names
Bug reassigned from package `grub-installer' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping proce
Le Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr a écrit:
> * Felix SPORTELLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-08 15:54]:
> > There is a critical bug on the sarge installation of the daily build of
> > sarge version 8/7/2004.
> > In fact the package cannot be installed while the installation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 256470
Bug#256470: modconf: location of modprobe config files changed with module-init-tools
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Yann Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> th
|| On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:34:49 +0200
|| Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cp> Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Package: di-utils-reboot
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> I find it convenient sometimes (especially when using UML) to have d-i halt
>> the system as
Hello,
I downloaded the d-i 07 july 2004 version.
We have improvements now.
The ide-cd, ide-cdrom, ide-isofs were installed.
It seems that basic cdrom is working now.
But the other modules were not loaded:
ide-mod
ide-probe-mod
ide-generic
ide-floppy
ide-scsi
I tried expert and expert26 modes. Tr
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:29:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:17:38PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:24AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > Pasi Kärkkäinen wro
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:18:53PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:24AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > > "Unable to install GRUB in (hd0)
> > > > Executing 'grub-install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258251 debian-installer
Bug#258251: initrd-tools cannot be installed during the base system install.
Bug reassigned from package `initrd-tools' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
>
> >>From the initrd:
> >
> > Package: discover1-data-udeb
> > Status: install ok unpacked
> > Version: 1.2004.02.08-7
> > Description: hardware lists for libdiscover1 (short list)
> >
> > Package: discover1-udeb
> > Status:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 02:52:12PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I have a very naive question about the initrd-tools package:
> what is the proper way to quit the DELAY shell ?
>
> My thought was to enter `exit' (or `quit'),
> but if I do that I get a kernel panic message.
I think debian-user is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 258216 grub-installer
Bug#258216: Debian-installer, installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
> retitle 258216 cannot handle traditional device names
Bug#258216: Debian-installer, installation
Hello,
Resently we sent you an email about mor
t g age r at e
going up, just from
last week that ra t e
s went up by 2 point. Its not to
late to lock yourmor tg age r at
e. You can qualifiy to get a
400, 000 at 400 a month. But
please
act fast as the ra
tes will not stay low for
Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
From the initrd:
Package: discover1-data-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 1.2004.02.08-7
Description: hardware lists for libdiscover1 (short list)
Package: discover1-udeb
Status: install ok unpacked
Version: 1.5-12
Provides: discover
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4
Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb:
I suspect it will be easier with bochs, as qemu is missing a feature.
bochs can use the 'term' console driver, and then use normal stdin and
stdout as the console. This console would be easy to control using
expect.
Sounds interesting for test automation.
Since a few
Hello List,
I have a very naive question about the initrd-tools package:
what is the proper way to quit the DELAY shell ?
My thought was to enter `exit' (or `quit'),
but if I do that I get a kernel panic message.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
