Re: [Bacula-users] disk backup "without volumes"?

2007-04-02 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi Brenden, list; and first off thanks a lot for all of your hints and inspirations on that issue. ["Brenden Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:00:30 +1200] > We currently only use bacula to backup our windows servers and the > backup servers themselves. For all the *NIX boxes w

Re: [Bacula-users] EMERGENCY help needed

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 5:40 AM, Brandon Griggs wrote: > I am attempting to restore over 160gb of data that was backed up > while some users were still logged in. As a result, some files have > size errors. > > I do not care if the the bad files are not restored but cannot go > through one at a tim

Re: [Bacula-users] Several volumes ?

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 4/1/2007 12:01 AM, Jean-François Leroux wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to bacula. I'm running it on debian etch and it is bacula 1.38.11-8. > I want to backup several servers on a backup server with a big disk > array. However, I think a single huge backup would be rather messy (or > tedious)

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] detail structure of interaction between conf. files

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, You are in effect asking for support here, and for that you will get better, faster, and more complete responses by using our normal support mechanism, which is described on the Support page of www.bacula.org On Monday 02 April 2007 06:54, priyanka singh wrote: > We have finally deploy

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
I suspect that you have a bad driver. I don't think I have ever seen a non-SCSI tape driver that works correctly, probably because they are written by disk driver programmers that don't understand the subtleties of tape drivers. I'd recommend that if possible you hook your drive up through a g

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Sebastiaan Veldhuisen
Hmmzz, Houston we have a problem. This is a SATA drive so hooking it up to a SCSI HBA is impossible. If i run the diagnostic tests of the Quantum DLT Sage Talk, read and write actions are working perfectly. If the drivers was bad, this should fail also. I guess that Bacula only supports SCSI tap

[Bacula-users] restore problem

2007-04-02 Thread Iori Remo
Hello, I'm using bacula 1.36.2-2sarge1 on my linux Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 server with a connected SSL 1016 LTO autochanger. All the backup operation seems to be done correclty, montly full, weekly differential, daily incremental. Trying to restore a file from the last backup operation everything

[Bacula-users] Getting two copies of tape backup

2007-04-02 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. I'm doing full backups monthly on tapes and differential/incremental on an HD meanwhile. I finally convinced my customer that tapes need to be brought outside their building, so they decided to make two copies, bring one outside and leave the other at hand in case it's needed. What's the

[Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Brian Debelius
Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 What would cause bacula to run a job, load the correct tape(in this case B001) , and then say intervention needed please mount volume (B001)? Then I manually have to umount the tape, then mount the same tape again, and the job runs? bri

[Bacula-users] Sony SDX-260V ATAPI AIT-E Turbo Dirve Questions

2007-04-02 Thread Bob McDonald
Has anyone had any success with one of these drives? I've tried several configurations and am having no joy. Running bacula 2.0.3 on Gentoo Linux. Kernel - 2.6.20 GCC 4.1.2 Glibc 2.5. I tried using ide-scsi but was unable to write to the drive. basic mt commands worked (status, rewind, etc.)

[Bacula-users] Bacula recycling volumes before their time

2007-04-02 Thread James Cort
Hi, I'm using bacula 2.0.3 and I'm having a problem with Bacula recycling volumes before I want it to. This problem has been ongoing since version 1.38.something so it's either a very longstanding bug or my configuration is broken. What equipment I have to make sure this all works: A Dell Po

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I bet you don't have to unmount the tape, just mount it. That's my situation anyway. I forget why that is exactly, but it had something to do with having the media closed after a backup. Brian Debelius wrote: > Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3;

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 14:34, Brian Debelius wrote: > Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 Nice, I wish everyone would put a line like that -- it gets you a "free" answer :-) > > What would cause bacula to run a job, load the correct tape(in this case > B001) , and then say in

[Bacula-users] Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread spouynt BER
Hi, I did some tests with a configuration file which has an Autochanger with only two tapes and it works, so how can I extend the file to use the eight (8) tapes of my autoloader ? I found only two devices in the /dev/ witch I identified as tape drives : the /dev/st0 and /dev/nst0 ! and the a

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
Egads, it seems to me that you are confused between Drives and Slots! >From what I understand, you have a *single* drive, but 8 slots -- i.e. one read head, and a set of 8 tapes that can be selected one at a time. If this is the case, your conf file should have only one Device (i.e. Drive-1).

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 14:34, Brian Debelius wrote: >> Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 > > Nice, I wish everyone would put a line like that -- it gets you a "free" > answer :-) > >> What would cause bacula t

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Brian Debelius
Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 14:34, Brian Debelius wrote: >> Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 > > Nice, I wish everyone would put a line like that -- it gets you a "free" > answer :-) > >> What would cause bacula to run a job, load the correct tape(in this case >>

Re: [Bacula-users] disk spooling and despooling: concurrency

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan Brown wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Marc Cuypers wrote: > >> I'm asking this because backups without spooling are faster than those >> with spooling. Is this normal? > > Yes - for a single job > > If you have multiple concurrent jobs running t

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread John Drescher
> Hi, I did some tests with a configuration file which has an Autochanger with > only two tapes and it works, so how can I extend the file to use the eight > (8) tapes of my autoloader ? I found only two devices in the /dev/ witch I > identified as tape drives : > > the /dev/st0 and /dev/nst0 ! and

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Brian Debelius
Brian Debelius wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: >> On Monday 02 April 2007 14:34, Brian Debelius wrote: >>> Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 >> Nice, I wish everyone would put a line like that -- it gets you a "free" >> answer :-) >> >>> What would cause bacula to run a job, load the c

[Bacula-users] Re : Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread spouynt
Ah ! OK ! So I have to change only the logical name and the drive index ? - Message d'origine De : Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : spouynt BER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Envoyé le : Lundi, 2 Avril 2007, 15h04mn 03s Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 13:27, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: > Hmmzz, > > Houston we have a problem. This is a SATA drive so hooking it up to a > SCSI HBA is impossible. > > If i run the diagnostic tests of the Quantum DLT Sage Talk, read and > write actions are working perfectly. If the drivers w

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
I'll let the list help you on this as they are better than I am, especially for Win32 questions. Two points though, you may have the wrong slot numbers defined in the catalog. "update slots" can help, if that is the case. Debugging: list volume=xxx will tell you if the slot is properly def

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula recycling volumes before their time

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Cort wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using bacula 2.0.3 and I'm having a problem with Bacula recycling > volumes before I want it to. This problem has been ongoing since > version 1.38.something so it's either a very longstanding bug or my > configurat

[Bacula-users] Bweb and brestore problem

2007-04-02 Thread Jérôme Massano
Hello. I wrote this mail to the list few days ago, and got no response. Please answer me, that is the last step to get all my backup system functionning (I actually can launch restores from the console, but I really would like to be able to launch it from a web interface). Original message-

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Brian Debelius
Update slots shows slot 3 * Catalog record for Volume "B001" updated to reference slot 3 List volume shows slot 3 28 | B001 | Append| 1 | 55,873,556,480 | 57 | 7,257,600 | 1 |3 | 1 | X10 | 2007-04-02 11:40:41 | status storage=xxx ok, I will tr

[Bacula-users] Full Backup Detection

2007-04-02 Thread Xeos Laenor
I've noticed a no strange behavior when i start a new job. Bacula verify if there is a Full backup in catalog when the job is add to the queue but not when the job really start. It could be a problem if i have already an identical (full) backup in progress. In this case, when i add the new job i

[Bacula-users] Discrepencies in bacula results...Bacup time and speed

2007-04-02 Thread Naufal Zamir
Hi everyone. I am using bacula version 1.38.5. Below are some of the results related to my backup. To the best of my knowledge, the congurartion on all the clients (Windows XP) is same. I have been unable to resolve the discrepencies in the result. If any one can please help me in this regard.

Re: [Bacula-users] Sony SDX-260V ATAPI AIT-E Turbo Dirve Questions

2007-04-02 Thread Robert Nelson
I was never able to make mine work on Linux; it works fine on Windows. In fact this drive was part of my motivation for porting the Storage Daemon to Windows. As near as I can tell, Linux support of ATAPI and SATA tape drives is broken. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

Re: [Bacula-users] Bweb and brestore problem

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have not personally tried this, but am I to assume that you've read the installation documentation? I did, and it seemed fairly thorough. There are changes you need to make to Apache, if I'm not mistaken, to support the proper MIME types, etc. Again,

Re: [Bacula-users] Install-problems with OpenSUSE 10.2

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Take a look at the .spec file (instead of doing a rebuild on the file, do an install... the spec will go into /usr/src/redhat someplace) -- you should be able to see there what --define's are valid and which are not. Perhaps there is a subtle naming di

Re: [Bacula-users] Sony SDX-260V ATAPI AIT-E Turbo Dirve Questions

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 18:02, Robert Nelson wrote: > I was never able to make mine work on Linux; it works fine on Windows. Interesting. That tends to confirm my view that the Linux non-SCSI driver writers don't understand all the nuances of tape drives ... > In fact this drive was part of my

Re: [Bacula-users] Full Backup Detection

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 18:00, Xeos Laenor wrote: > I've noticed a no strange behavior when i start a new job. > Bacula verify if there is a Full backup in catalog when the job is add to > the queue but not when the job really start. > It could be a problem if i have already an identical (full) b

[Bacula-users] Re : Re : Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread spouynt
---OpenSUSE 10.2, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; HP-Ultrium 1x8 Autoloader (with 7 slots full and one empty )--- (I want my free "Answer" Kern ;-) ! ) when I've added the six 'Device' directives with Name = Drive-i # Drive Index = i-1 where i in [1;7] the tray monitor do

Re: [Bacula-users] Re : Re : Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread John Drescher
On 4/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---OpenSUSE 10.2, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; HP-Ultrium 1x8 Autoloader (with > 7 slots full and one empty )--- > > (I want my free "Answer" Kern ;-) ! ) > > when I've added the six 'Device' directives with > Name = Drive-i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on FC6 ?

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to this, you might have some luck: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Relationship_to_free_or_community_versions Mike Seda wrote: > Hi All, > Does anyone know if the bacula-client FC6 x86_64 rpms work with RHEL5? > Best,

Re: [Bacula-users] Re : Re : Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 18:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ---OpenSUSE 10.2, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; HP-Ultrium 1x8 Autoloader (with 7 slots full and one empty )--- > > (I want my free "Answer" Kern ;-) ! ) You already got one, but the above line helps a lot so merits a second :-) > > when

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Sebastiaan Veldhuisen
On ma, 2007-04-02 at 17:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 13:27, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: > > Hmmzz, > > > > Houston we have a problem. This is a SATA drive so hooking it up to a > > SCSI HBA is impossible. > > > > If i run the diagnostic tests of the Quantum DLT Sage Ta

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 02 April 2007 19:40, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: > On ma, 2007-04-02 at 17:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 02 April 2007 13:27, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: > > > Hmmzz, > > > > > > Houston we have a problem. This is a SATA drive so hooking it up to a > > > SCSI HBA is impos

[Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Raymond Luong
Hi I am using bacula 2.0.3 I got my linuxFC6-dir and windowsXP-sd machine working fine together using file storage but for some reason when I backup a windows 2003 server the volume size is greater than the data being backup. I have a windows 200 server and it does not seem to have the same proble

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: > On ma, 2007-04-02 at 17:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> On Monday 02 April 2007 13:27, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: >>> Hmmzz, >>> >>> Houston we have a problem. This is a SATA drive so hooking it up to a >>> SCSI HBA is

Re: [Bacula-users] Getting two copies of tape backup

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 1:46 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > I'm doing full backups monthly on tapes and differential/incremental on > an HD meanwhile. Have you tried restoring, so that you need both tape and file volumes? > I finally convinced my customer that tapes need to be brought outside

Re: [Bacula-users] Re : Re : Multiple Tapes

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 6:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ---OpenSUSE 10.2, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; HP-Ultrium 1x8 Autoloader > (with 7 slots full and one empty )--- > > (I want my free "Answer" Kern ;-) ! ) You get it from me, ok? > when I've added the six 'Device' directives with > Name =

Re: [Bacula-users] Intervention needed

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 5:17 PM, Brian Debelius wrote: > Brian Debelius wrote: >> Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> On Monday 02 April 2007 14:34, Brian Debelius wrote: Windows 2003, dir, sd, fd; Bacula 2.0.3; VXA-172 >>> Nice, I wish everyone would put a line like that -- it gets you a "free" >>> answer :-)

Re: [Bacula-users] Full Backup Detection

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 6:37 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 18:00, Xeos Laenor wrote: >> I've noticed a no strange behavior when i start a new job. >> Bacula verify if there is a Full backup in catalog when the job is add to >> the queue but not when the job really start. >> It could

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, look: On 4/2/2007 8:34 PM, Raymond Luong wrote: > Hi > >... Here is the out put from a full backup of the > windows 2003 server, which is name vega. The size of that job total 6.5g ^ > where as the data is only 3.5g. any

Re: [Bacula-users] problems with Quantum DLT-V4 SATA

2007-04-02 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 19:40, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: >> On ma, 2007-04-02 at 17:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> On Monday 02 April 2007 13:27, Sebastiaan Veldhuisen wrote: >> I think you misunderstand me. I know Bacula ca

Re: [Bacula-users] Discrepencies in bacula results...Bacup time and speed

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 6:02 PM, Naufal Zamir wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I am using bacula version 1.38.5. Below are some of the results related > to my backup. To the best of my knowledge, the congurartion on all the > clients (Windows XP) is same. I have been unable to resolve the > discrepencies in

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Raymond Luong
I right click on the folders being backup on the windows 2003 server and select properties. That gives me a combine size of the folders and it comes out to around 3.5g. How it comes out to be 6.9g during backup I do not know. I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this issue for me. Thanks Ra

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 10:46 PM, Raymond Luong wrote: > I right click on the folders being backup on the windows 2003 server and > select properties. That gives me a combine size of the folders and it comes > out to around 3.5g. How it comes out to be 6.9g during backup I do not know. > I'm hoping someon

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Raymond Luong
So you don't see anything wrong with my setup files or the job report? Raymond Luong IT Department Mocana Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Lehmann Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:01 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net

[Bacula-users] Bacula and OpenBSD's pf Firewall

2007-04-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
I run Bacula v1.38 on my home network. Both the director and the client with which I am having trouble are running FreeBSD 6.1. Things worked flawlessly until I changed my firewall from ipfw2 to pf, backups fail intermittently on my router due to "broken network pipes" usually after somewhere

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 11:38 PM, Raymond Luong wrote: > So you don't see anything wrong with my setup files or the job report? I can determine if something's wrong only if I have all relevant data :-) Arno > Raymond Luong > IT Department > Mocana Corporation > > -Original Message- > From: [EM

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Raymond Luong
What additional data would you need? Raymond Luong IT Department Mocana Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Lehmann Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:48 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backu

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Darien Hager
> I right click on the folders being backup on the windows 2003 > server and > select properties. That gives me a combine size of the folders and > it comes > out to around 3.5g. How it comes out to be 6.9g during backup I do > not know. > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this issue

[Bacula-users] bacula-fd on Linux giving intermittent errors

2007-04-02 Thread Michael Proto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I'm seeing a strange problem with my bacula-fd clients after upgrading all of my systems to v2.0.3 (client and server). Intermittently, when performing a backup of some random client I'll see the following error in the Director: 30-Mar 02:

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/2/2007 11:49 PM, Raymond Luong wrote: > What additional data would you need? Oh, I thought that would be obvious... the file sizes you back up, the file sizes on disk for what you back up (to see if any of them are compressed), and the file sizes Bacula stores. Under unix/linux, gett

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd on Linux giving intermittent errors

2007-04-02 Thread Jason King
Looks like you are having a socket timeout error. Put in the "Heartbeat Interval" on the director config so it will keep the channel open and see if that helps. Jason Michael Proto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I'm seeing a strange problem with my b

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Michael Nelson
On Mon, April 2, 2007 3:06 pm, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > Under unix/linux, getting the necessary information together would be > rather simple, under windows I have no idea how I would do this. Lots of clicking and rebooting, like everything else in Windows. ;-) -- This message has been scanned

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd on Linux giving intermittent errors

2007-04-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 4/3/2007 12:04 AM, Michael Proto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I'm seeing a strange problem with my bacula-fd clients after upgrading > all of my systems to v2.0.3 (client and server). Intermittently, when > performing a backup of some random

Re: [Bacula-users] backup volume size greater than files

2007-04-02 Thread Arthur Emerson III
Darien Hager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you reading from "Size:" or "Size on disk:"? If there is a > significant difference between the two, then that may indicate the > presence of "sparse files", in which case you will want to set > sparse=yes in your Fileset's Options{} block. It may al

[Bacula-users] tape support in Windows sd

2007-04-02 Thread Jeff Dickens
Has anyone been using tape drives on a Windows-based sd ? I've had to remove the tape drive from the system where my director and main disk-based sd lives. I have a Windows system handy with a Gigabit connection, and it occurred to me this might be a good place to put the tape drive. It's a

Re: [Bacula-users] tape support in Windows sd

2007-04-02 Thread Gordon McLellan
Jeff, I'm running the latest bacula on a windows system, with a Dell (ibm) LTO3 drive. No problems at all so far, nock on wood. This is a little different from what you're asking, but I don't see that it matters, since director, client and storage are all separate daemons. Everything worked pre

Re: [Bacula-users] Error relabeling a tape

2007-04-02 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 28.03.07 um 12:11 Uhr: > > > > OK, that of course works. > > > > So I can consider the relable feature of bacula broken? > > This doesn't look at all like a bug, so don't bother to report it at least > not > with the current information as I will simply close the bug