Hi everyone.
I am using bacula version 1.38.5. Below are some of the results related to
my backup. To the best of my knowledge, the congurartion on all the clients
(Windows XP) is same. I have been unable to resolve the discrepencies in the
result. If any one can please help me in this regard.
Client
Actual Data on disk(GB)
#Hrs taken for backup
Rate(KB/s)
FD bytes written(GB)
x.x.x.51
8.8
18
404.1
26GB
x.x.x.52
3.81
3:11
402.5
4.6
x.x.x.53
1.48
3:35
390.4
5
x.x.x.54
1.36
1:26
348.8
1.7
x.x.x.57
3.13
3:02
402.2
4.38
x.x.x.58
1.08
1
386.1
1.39
x.x.x.48
8.77
6:19
404.9
26
Noted Discrepancies:
- Why Does Bacula show lot more FD bytes written then actual Data?
Does this have to do anything with the backup speed, which I am getting?
Similarly SD Bytes written are also nearly equal to FD bytes.
- Client x.x.x.51 and x.x.x.48 have nearly equal data i.e. 8.8 GB and
8.77 GB, and they were backed up with nearly same speed, i.e. 404.1KB/s and
404.9 KB/s, yet the time taken for each client is vastly different i.e.
18 hrs and 6 hrs respectively.
- For one of the client not mentioned in the table, there was problem
with communication with the FD dameon. It took nearly 12 hrs for bacula to
go to next job after waiting. Is there any configuration I am missing about
the wait parameter of some sort.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
