-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alan Brown wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Marc Cuypers wrote: > >> I'm asking this because backups without spooling are faster than those >> with spooling. Is this normal? > > Yes - for a single job > > If you have multiple concurrent jobs running the individual backups will > run as slow as a single backup, but because they will interleave you are > able to do 2 backups in the same amount of time as one backup.
And something I have not seen said yet in this thread: NOT using spooling for concurrent backups will cause restores on any one of those jobs to take exponentially longer due to interleaved data. A penny saved is a dollar earned. :) - -- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGERwgmb+gadEcsb4RAiNZAJ9adsPlLZwSNBolko5zSs7RKIDD0QCgxwx2 8Gtc22O8iyNEJ6Zamepleio= =CzrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
