On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote Warrigal
NTTPF.
--Warrigal
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:40 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If I can, I join the above contract.
>> I imagine this is comparable to saying "If I am wearing a hat, I
>>
On 12/6/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 18:17 Warrigal: Go ahead and announce intent on my behalf.
>>
>> Without objection, Warrigal intends to add the paragraph "A
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I CFJ on the statement "It is a thing."
&g
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And rightly so. "It" might be "the king of England", for all we know.
The fact that he's hypothetical doesn't make him any less of a king, or... yeah.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the future, I may CFJ on the statements "It is a being.", "It is a
>> referent.", "It is a co
>> Tue 2 Dec 23:27:07 Unnamed pledge created by Warrigal
>>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that
>>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance.
>
> Having received no objection, I terminate this contract.
This is a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gratuitous arguments:
>
> I believe Warrigal is the Executor of the quoted message from the PNP
> (based on http://nomic.info/perlnomic/log.txt ).
You are correct, but I don't believe that makes a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the PNP? (It was: "The PerlNomic Partnership shall act by using the
>> mechanisms of the PerlNomic game to send messa
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
>> A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
>> announcement of eir deregistration)."
>
> This is where it fails.
>
> Wel
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
>> A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
>> announcement of eir deregistration)."
>
> This is where it fails.
>
> Wel
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> Le doy un prop a comex por disminuir la relación señal/ruido.
> (Translation: I give a prop to comex for lowering the signal-to-noise
> ratio.)
Oops. I meant "para" here, not "por". The translation remains the same.
--Warrigal
rgument that active verbs
> are generally better than passive ones.
Active would be "X wins the game"; passive would be "the game is won
[by X]". "To win the game" is an infinitive which has no subject and
is therefore neither active nor passive.
--Warrigal
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> I consent to be bound by DiploNomic.
I deem this close enough to agreement that it counts as joining
DiploNomic. Welcome aboard. Care to actually register in DiploNomic,
now?
--Warrigal
otes on my behalf. Priority to Warrigal if e wants to.
I defer.
--Warrigal
ssenting opinion: I at least glance at those.
--Warrigal
uot;
(Don't go supporting and objecting yet, Agorans; DiploNomic hasn't
announced intent yet.)
I believe that if Agoran Consent is achieved, I'll be allowed to
perform this dependent action myself.
--Warrigal
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
Any Player can send a public message to Agora with support and without
2 objections in 4 to 14 days.}
>> That would require Agoran consent unless DiploNomic is more biological
>> than
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>
>> You're right. With support and without 2 objections in 4 to 14 days, I
>> intend to send the following public message to Agora on behalf of
>> DiploNomic: "With Agoran Consent, DiploNom
the rules (e.g. if one is not a player).
--Warrigal "Yeah, Right"
at doesn't say
> its rules CAN be changed is typically assumed to have an unchangeable
> ruleset.
It has proposals, and those proposals can take effect. We don't need
to be more specific.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 25 Dec 2008, at 23:51, Warrigal wrote:
>> It has proposals, and those proposals can take effect. We don't need
>> to be more specific.
>
> I disagree.
Your opinion would matter more if you were a player of Di
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 26 Dec 2008, at 00:03, Warrigal wrote:
>> Your opinion would matter more if you were a player of DiploNomic.
>
> As it purports to be a changing Agoran contract, my opinion is very
> relevant.
DiploNomic can interpret
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> I'm pretty sure only rules can define offices.
Yes, but only rules can define dependent actions.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 23:08 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Mon 5 Jan 21:32:10 Warrigal becomes a senator
> Something's gone badly wrong here. How did Warrigal manage to last long
> enough to become a Senator without accide
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Uh oh, R2228 has a grammatical error, says "Rests are a fixed asset"
> (singular). Does that mean that the set of all Rests is a single
> indivisible asset?
A Wikipedia article very recently said, "The Dingo (Canis lup
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> FriendlyNormish
> (http://normish.org/ - not in Nomic Database)
do srera lo li'i na viska la'o .ubu.
http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/Rootnomic .ubu
mi'e kerlo
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:31 PM, wrote:
> .i doi kerlo mu'i ma do jbobau tavla fi la .namik. .i me'iro kelci cu jbopre
.i mu'i lo su'u lo ka vajni cu steci .ubury.ibu kei mi jbobau tavla
mi'e kerlo
nds (almost) correct to me but the
second does not:
...subject to the restrictions that no more than 5 points can be
transferred this way either , or , per week
...subject to the restrictions that no more than 5 points can be
transferred this way neither , nor , per week
I would probably most prefer the first of these, except with
"restriction" for "restrictions".
--Warrigal
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I deregister.
>
> -root
With all these deregistrations going around, I'm sure people would be
severely disappointed if I didn't deregister as well. Therefore, I
hereby invoke my R101 right.
--Warrigal "Specifically, Paragraph Five"
shed" for breaking
> the rules? -Goethe
Indeed, receiving no payment for not fulfilling an obligation one does
not have is different from receiving no payment for not fulfilling an
obligation one *does* have. Still, I believe we generally don't reward
people for fulfilling obligations per se; we specify a reward and an
obligation that are for the same thing.
--Warrigal
I could
vacuously be considered Rebellious.
--Warrigal, who always refers to other people in the first person
id that.
I have nothing more to say right now.
--Warrigal
ence of "first-class" and by
> replacing "Executor" with "originator".
>
> Amend Rule 2156 by removing "first-class" and "(default for all other
> players)".
I love it. Please do.
--Warrigal, who hopes that this message won't cause too many people to
vote AGAINST it
ll get rests and be exiled just like a first-class person.
--Warrigal
elaborate: You can't agree to things,
only texts. When you agreed to rule 1742, you agreed to its text, so
its text became a contract as well as a rule. When you amended it, the
old text ceased to be a contract and the new text became a contract,
but the old text did not cease to be a rule and the new text did not
become a rule.
--Warrigal
2 7 2 0 26 15 1 6 19 2 9 0
>> Warrigal 7 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> woggle 5 6 1 19 7 0 11 3 8 9 22 1
>> Wooble 5 18 0 25 8 6 9 8 0 11 11 0
>
> Warrigal, woggle, and Woo
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I would like to register to play Agora.
Welcome to Agora, H. Player Aaron.
--Warrigal
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Generally speaking, I don't try to fix a loophole unless I've had a
> chance to exploit it, unless it's really urgent or game-breaking.
Proto: Remove sudoers line 27.
--Warrigal
ed.
> }
Note that prohibitions on deregistration are ineffective by Rule 101.
--Warrigal
2211" changes to contain
different members. If "Rule 2211 is a proposal", then members of the
set "Rule 2211" are members of the set "a proposal"; however, changing
the membership of the set "Rule 2211" doesn't affect any proposals,
other than to change whether or not they are rules. This only sounds
silly because we don't actually think of it that way.
--Warrigal
xistence depends on that contract.
>
> As the existence of the contestmaster attribute does not depend on the
> contract, dependent actions whose effects would include changing a
> contest's contestmaster are not possible.
Gratuitous arguments: rule 2136 authorizes this to happen whether or
not 1728 does.
--Warrigal
that e initiated with the clear intent of being deregistered.
>
> "I deregister by mistake."
>
> I wonder how that one would be ruled?
GUILTY, I expect.
--Warrigal
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4)
>
> Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to power
> 4.
>
> -Yally
AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are unrestricted.
--Warrigal
complete list of the current rules, and make such
a list available to all players
* make a random determination whenever such determination is
required by the rules.
'219.' If a player believes that the rules are such that further play
is impossible, or that the legality of a move
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> SAVAGE (Voting Limit: 0)
> (All others not yet listed, as well as:)
> Warrigal
Are you sure?
--Warrigal
t chocolate ice cream. Every player has the
right to eat strawberry ice cream rather than eat chocolate ice
cream."
I think this means that a player NEED NOT eat chocolate ice cream if
they eat strawberry ice cream instead.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I NoV against Warrigal for violating the power-1.7 rule 2169 by
>> violating the equation of CFJ 2119.
>>
>> (Context: the equation of CFJ 2119 is:
>> {{
>&
for the immediately preceding
sixty days; however, a player's status as a Senator can be otherwise
changed", and just changing the third paragraph to say "a senator is
generally . . ."
--Warrigal
Promote all power-1 rules to the power 1.1. Enact the November
2002 ruleset at power 1.
--Warrigal
, what a strange typo.
--Warrigal
#x27;t cause it to
cease to exist.
OR DOES IT?
--Warrigal
ot;X means Y" is not the same as "if X, then Y". The
former puts Y at the same power level as the rule that uses X; the
latter puts it at the same power level as itself.
--Warrigal
ac.uk
> ihope ihope...@gmail.com
I consent to being a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>> While we've found that SHALL -> CAN, we haven't found that SHALL NOT ->
>> CANNOT. In fact, accepting that SHALL NOT -> CANNOT would probably
>> break a lot of things.
>
> It seems to me (based on a dusty recollection of formal logic) th
modify a Soft Bylaw or publish any message on Agora
Corporation's behalf with 1 Corporate Consent.}}
--Warrigal
ber of AGRA they can own if they're not in it.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> The point?
It's yet another of my schemes to give Agora a fungible, liquid,
relatively stable currency.
--Warrigal
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I believe precedent is that flipping a certain Agoran switch (namely,
>> Citizenship) is not the same as an explicit, willful agreement to be
>> bound by the rules
on in the decoded output seems to match the amount of
information in the encoded messages, indicating that there is no or
very little content which has not been revealed.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> We should so join this, right?
I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic will not join.
--Warrigal
ouncement. (Is {es} the correct word there? Or would {is} or
>>> {eis} be better?)
>>
>> eir.
>
> Ah, thanks. I thought that was only used in the possessive.
If "awaiting his return and posting [something] own win announcement"
isn't the possessive, then what is it?
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
> do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
> 1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
--Warrigal
thing is a CFJ.
>
>
In what message was this called? I may want to appeal it if it sets
the precedent that it's possible to change whether a past message was
effective or not.
--Warrigal
case]
In that case, I won't attempt to appeal.
--Warrigal
I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
forgot two thirds of it.
I change my nickname to Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas
O'Malley, abbreviated Th
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Warrigal wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>>> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
>>
>> See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the mo
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, entitled {Instant Adoption}, AI 3, II
> 1, coauthored by Goethe:
> {{{
> Create a new power-3 rule:
> {{
> A player may cause instant adoption of a proposal that has not
> yet been voted on with A*P/(A+1)
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Luke Benner wrote:
> I am requesting to join Agora. The name I will be writing under will be
> Randy Olshaw.
Lessee, by Rule 217, "to join Agora" is the same as "to register", so
you're requesting registration, which, by Rule 869, makes you a
player. I think.
Wel
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> --Thomas O'Malley (see, I remembered this time)
>
> What is your official name anyway "Warrigal"?
I believe it's Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas O'Malley.
--Thomas O'Malley
English would probably include a lot of things we don't want to
include, such as arbitrary computer programs written by arbitrary
people.
--Warrigal--no, that's not right. Thomas O'Malley.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:35 PM, comex wrote:
> A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then
> gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids.
>
> The Effective Rate for a deposit is its Rate, multiplied by a value
> depending on the number of previous deposits made in the same week
>
2009/6/8 Charles Walker :
> I submit the following three proposals:
> {
> Official Secrets Act
> AI = 1, II = 2
> Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled "The Official Secrets Act" with the
> following text:
This is going to run afoul of Rule 101 unless you amend it. Also,
let's not have "Secret Informa
If I may...
Official Secrets Act (AI = 3, II = 2)
{Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled "The Official Secrets Act" with the
following text:
{The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is the agreement with the
following text: "This is a public contract and a pledge known as the
Non-Disclosure Agreement." P
I change my nickname to Tanner Swett.
--Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal
a different deck". Monthly draws are from
> deck frequencies indicated by players' switches.
I imagine that Legislative and Academic could be merged into a single
Legislative deck; they're both about proposals. Renaming Bureaucratic
to Executive would make a lot of s
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt :
> Disagree, is binding.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be a sentence. Are you saying "I
disagree; it's binding"? "'Disagree' is binding"? Something else which
would actually make sense to me in this context?
--Warrigal
2009/6/14 Alex Smith :
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 02:21 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
>> I cease to agree to all non-binding agreements.
> As the notary, I think the only effect this has is to cancel any
> contract creation attempts you made in the past which failed because
> they weren&#
ontract and a pledge
known as ä, which terminates 24 hours from the time of its
publication. Anyone can act on my behalf to CFJ on the following
statement: "Within the past 24 hours, Warrigal created a pledge known
as ä."}
--Warrigal
one you joined.
Nobody except me agreed to the old ə, and I un-agreed to it. From it.
--Warrigal
2009/6/16 Elliott Hird
> 2009/6/16 Taral :
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott
> > Hird wrote:
> >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No
> >> consent was involved.
> >
> > I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a script.
> >
> > --
> > Taral
> > "Pl
marvellous" probably isn't a bad 'ordinary language'
> interpretation. (Don't like that it's not a noun? Please direct your
> complaint to Ozymandias c/o Mr Shelley.)
I believe his name is Mu-Nan, and you'd be better of sending it c/o
NFN Llewellyn anyway.
Oh, wait, *that* Ozymandias.
--Warrigal
ng, meaning it's split into syllables:
.deivyd.slo,ud. Given this, of course, .deivyd.slod. probably would
have been a better Lojbanization.
--Warrigal
"David slowed his pace slightly as his ears, protruding as they were,
kept snagging on the foliage."
en if this were an attempt to flip
a contract's Disclosure to Public, it would not have succeeded.
--Tanner "Warrigal" Swett
2009/6/24 Ed Murphy
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2611
>
> == CFJ 2611 =
09 08:03:36 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.40 (Red Hat Linux)
Accept-Ranges: bytes
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.2.2
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-control: no-cache
Expires: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:03:42 -0700
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
--Warrigal
"David slowed his pace sligh
2009/7/1 Ed Murphy :
> As CotC, I intend (without 3 objections) to change this case's
> Interest Index to 0.
You can't; only the Justiciar and the Justiciar can do that. Which is
silly enough that it might be false.
--Warrigal, who thinks that citing Agora's rules in APA format is silly
?
That is the Conductor's report, published as required by Rule 2126 via
Rule 2166 via Rule 2143. Chiefly, it lists how many of each type of
Note (Rule 2126) each player owns.
--Warrigal
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
LATIN SMALL LETTER O
LATIN SMALL LETTER W
2009/7/8 Warrigal :
> LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
> LATIN SMALL LETTER O
> LATIN SMALL LETTER W
Please disregard this message. It is a typo.
--Warrigal
e is that the software is really terrible.
Yes, but once you have your own server, you can scrape it all you want.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 18:52, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
>> Warrigal's registration.
>>
>> -coppro
>>
>
> I still do not see when
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>>> I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
>>> Warrigal's registration.
>>
>> I transfer a p
Waking up after a multi-month nap seems like a good idea to me. I
become active. I sit. I change my nickname to Tanner L. Swett.
—Tanner L. Swett, now one of the few Agorans who uses his real name
for Agora but a nickname for his "From" line
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I opine AFFIRM without prejudice. The original judgement suggests a
> precedent that even a disclaimered statement violates Truthiness if you
> don't reasonably believe it could be true.
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice for the same reason.
—
This has been hanging out in my drafts folder since the beginning of
this year. I've decided to finish it up and post it for the sake of
entertainment.
{This is a public contract known as Rent-a-Self. Membership in this
contract is restricted to players. Device number is a
party-to-this-contract s
You may want to add some fragments to this proposal's inode. Also, the
first paragraph contains the typo "repot".
—Coauthorial Candidate Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I believe this fails; you did not specify which Fragments you were using.
Submitting the proposal succeeded, but making it a D-Proposal failed.
—Lawyer Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On an unrelated note, my primary computer's power supply shorted out and
> caught fire a few days ago, meaning that I have only minimal use of it over
> the next couple of weeks until a replacement can be shipped (i.e. until the
> batteries r
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, wrote:
> Proposal "Different voting limits on democratic decisions?" (AI=2, II=1,
> distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Amend rule 2284 "Fee-based actions" by replacing
>
> A player CAN increase eir voting limit on a specified decision to
> adopt a proposal in its v
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
>
> -coppro
I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170
(power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing
nickname.
—Accuser Tanner L. Swett
101 - 200 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
