2009/6/17 Charles Reiss <woggl...@gmail.com> > I don't think your attempt to define 'Marvy' does anything. (The judge, > after carefully considering the implications of using it as guidance, > will probably decide not to in the best interest of the game.) And, > well, "you who are marvellous" probably isn't a bad 'ordinary language' > interpretation. (Don't like that it's not a noun? Please direct your > complaint to Ozymandias c/o Mr Shelley.)
I believe his name is Mu-Nan, and you'd be better of sending it c/o NFN Llewellyn anyway. Oh, wait, *that* Ozymandias. --Warrigal
