On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I CFJ on the statement "It is a thing." >> >> I retract this. I CFJ on the statement "It is a thing.", barring Murphy. >> >> --Warrigal, attempting to change the truth again > > Why barring Murphy, exactly?
He judged that it might not be an entity. --Warrigal
