Proto-judgement (and top-post): TRUE, because unless you believe a
contract is a forum, you have no reason to attempt to flip its
Publicity to Public; any attempt to do so is almost certainly an
attempt to flip its Disclosure to Public. I'm withholding this
judgement because it may be that even if this were an attempt to flip
a contract's Disclosure to Public, it would not have succeeded.

--Tanner "Warrigal" Swett

2009/6/24 Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com>
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2611
>
> ==============================  CFJ 2611  ==============================
>
>    The Grid's Disclosure has been flipped.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller:                                 allispaul
>
> Judge:                                  Tanner Swett
> Judgement:
>
> ========================================================================
>
> History:
>
> Called by allispaul:                    24 Jun 2009 06:42:55 GMT
> Assigned to Tanner Swett:               (as of this message)
>
> ========================================================================
>
> Caller's Arguments:
>
> First, you want to flip the contract's *Disclosure*, not *Publicity*, to
> Public.
>
> ========================================================================

Reply via email to