Proto-judgement (and top-post): TRUE, because unless you believe a contract is a forum, you have no reason to attempt to flip its Publicity to Public; any attempt to do so is almost certainly an attempt to flip its Disclosure to Public. I'm withholding this judgement because it may be that even if this were an attempt to flip a contract's Disclosure to Public, it would not have succeeded.
--Tanner "Warrigal" Swett 2009/6/24 Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2611 > > ============================== CFJ 2611 ============================== > > The Grid's Disclosure has been flipped. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: allispaul > > Judge: Tanner Swett > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by allispaul: 24 Jun 2009 06:42:55 GMT > Assigned to Tanner Swett: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > First, you want to flip the contract's *Disclosure*, not *Publicity*, to > Public. > > ========================================================================