Processed: Move to my hopefully spam-proof mailblocks account

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

support for the Clearcase version 
control system
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 139228 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#139228: debbugs: Include bug URL in notification e-mail
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 139614 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#139614: maelstrom: Turbofunk mode -> All extras mode
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 140757 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#140757: debian-policy: init.d script shouldn't be executable by non-root
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 144766 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#144766: joystick: init.d script should retreive stored calibration data if 
available
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 144768 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#144768: joystick: Better jitter tolerance for jscal
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 144839 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#144839: jscalibrator: Window has no border
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 144856 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#144856: mozilla-browser: Cannot type URLs longer than window width
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 147778 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#147778: [WANTED] sigwait(2)
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 151472 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151472: RFP: netdump -- Dump kernel crash information over the network
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 153736 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#153736: nethack: Successfully praying while swallowed should get me out
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 153776 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#153776: nethack-gnome: Options changed using Options menu item should be 
persisted
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 153780 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#153780: nethack-gnome: Tool tip should describe what is under the mouse
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 154628 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#154628: evolution: Auto-checked mail accounts should be checked at startup
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 154629 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#154629: nethack-gnome: Cannot enter # commands
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 159411 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#159411: libc6.1-dev: Stack size constants are way off
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 170719 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170719: ITP: jikesrvm -- Virtual machine for Java
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 193675 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#193675: trophy: Missing menu entry for continuing a game in progress
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 204689 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204689: uqm: Cyborg won't fight the Sa-Matra
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 204713 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204713: uqm: No Saved-Earth-Sequence
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 216375 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#216375: /usr/games/lsdldoom: End text contradicts GPL license
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 223612 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#223612: gnome-terminal: Don't resize window when adding tabs
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 225270 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225270: pilot-link: Question about /dev/pilot which is already there
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 225271 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225271: pilot-link: Should create a "pilot" group
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 227241 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227241: gstreamer-player-nautilus: Viewing dir as "Media" should put dir 
contents in playlist
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 227556 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#227556: nautilus-media: Cannot drag / drop files from audio view
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> submitter 228333 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#228333: /usr/bin/services-admin: Debian has no "Graphical mode" or "Text 
mode" runlevels
Changed Bug submitter from Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Bug#222130: [PATCH] : fix invalid __libc_dlclose() in nss_switch.c

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 222130  [PATCH] : fix invalid __libc_dlclose() in nsswitch.c
Bug#222130: libc6 : valgrind detects bad pointer in dl-close.c at program exit
Changed Bug title.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: tags pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 229273 pending
Bug#229273: nscd cannot be purged when the daemon is stopped
Tags were: patch
Bug#229484: postinst fails when nscd already running
Bug#252284: nscd: Initscript reload method fails
Bug#253119: Wrong exit status on start if nscd already running
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#254314: mutt: segfault in UTF-8 locale with specific "color body ..." command

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 254314 libc6
Bug#254314: mutt: segfault in UTF-8 locale with specific "color body ..." 
command
Bug reassigned from package `mutt' to `libc6'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: h

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 206459 resolvconf
Bug#206459: nscd: negatiive caching of "hosts" still doesn't work
Bug reassigned from package `nscd' to `resolvconf'.

> severity 206459 wishlist
Bug#206459: nscd: negatiive caching of "hosts" still doesn't work
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> tags 206459 pending patch
Bug#206459: nscd: negatiive caching of "hosts" still doesn't work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, patch

> merge 206459 48976
Bug#48976: nscd: should reset (host)-database on dialup
Bug#206459: nscd: negatiive caching of "hosts" still doesn't work
Bug#60771: nscd must be restarted upon ip-up/ip-down
Bug#69256: nscd: Running nscd interferes with resolv.conf search
Bug#252251: nscd: Please add resolvconf support
Bug#252283: resolvconf: Please add nscd support
Merged 48976 60771 69256 206459 252251 252283.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: severity minor

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 196189 minor
Bug#196189: nscd: improper error message on wrong table name
Severity set to `minor'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon to my debian system

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 246493 libc6
Bug#246493: Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon to my debian system
Warning: Unknown package 'unknow'
Bug reassigned from package `unknow' to `libc6'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: narrowing down the bug

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package libc6
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libc6

> retitle 254314 regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances
Bug#254314: mutt: segfault in UTF-8 locale with specific "color body ..." 
command
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#75856: marked as done (nscd runs itself out of fd's, makes all name resolutions fail)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:47:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#75856: Still a problem?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2000 17:35:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 29 11:35:43 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bluebox.ne.mediaone.net (osiris.978.org) [:::24.168.164.38] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13pwMx-0005mt-00; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:35:43 -0600
Received: (qmail 13291 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Oct 2000 17:35:39 -
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:35:39 -0500
From: Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nscd runs itself out of fd's, makes all name resolutions fail
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: nscd
Version: 2.1.95-1
Severity: critical 

Somehow nscd is leaking fd's. It eventually uses every one it can allocate
and then the system enters a state where all nscd queries return immediately
with no data. ls and ps entries return with a numeric instead of a username,
it becomes impossible to log in or use su, etc. 

Leading up to the problem, you'll see:

Oct 28 13:11:16 osiris nscd: 27946: while accepting connection: Too many open 
files

intermittantly in the logs for a few days until it eventually hoses itself:

Oct 29 12:23:20 osiris nscd: 27946: while accepting connection: Bad file 
descriptor
Oct 29 12:23:20 osiris last message repeated 98 times

-- 
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 75856-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 05:47:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 14 22:47:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-20.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.1] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ba6nG-0007L0-00; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:47:34 -0700
Received: from [82.161.38.140] (helo=localhost)
by post-20.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)
id 1Ba6nE-000Mvn-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:47:32 +
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id F194912D221
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:47:24 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Bug#75856: Still a problem?
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 07:47:23 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 23:28, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> I'm now running 2.2.5-11.5 at a pretty large site with dozens of machines,
> and I haven't seen it get hosed like this in a long while. I suppose it's
> safe to mark this bug done even if none of the changelogs specificly claim
> it's fixed.

OK, let's hope it got fixed along the way somewhere.

--
Thomas

Bug#246493: marked as done (Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon to my debian system)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon 
to my debian system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 09:49:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 02:49:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJ8B2-0002Id-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:49:56 -0700
Received: (qmail 19613 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Apr 2004 09:49:24 -
Received: from pD9E9C307.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO gmx.net) (217.233.195.7)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 11:49:24 +0200
X-Authenticated: #10686181
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:49:27 +0200
From: reacend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 
Debian/1.6-5
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon to my debian system
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

PACKAGE: Unknow
VERSION:  Also Unknow

Hi There,

I can not logon from any client to the server i thinkt it is been a
bug

Here is a simple cut:



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
Linux linux 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux

The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software;
the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the
individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright.

Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
permitted by applicable law.
Last login: Thu Apr 29 09:57:49 2004
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/i386/dl-machine.h: 647:
elf_machine_rel_relative: Assertion `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) == 8'
failed!
Connection to 192.168.200.106 closed.





I dont now wich package it belongs to
So far if you need any informations please send me a mail...


Best Regards,
Mark Nicolas


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAkM93oKtmDMYNuGsRAmDXAKCFsXxeXDfGJDc7U20wllhOIq6zIwCfdZ14
bTy/95ymFMQyKC05vcP7ur8=
=DTMz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
Received: (at 246493-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 15:36:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 08:36:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaFzI-0005SB-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:36:36 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 17A67DEDF5; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:36 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:36:36 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Inconsistency detected by ld.so - Can not logon to 
my debian system
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004

Processed: Re: Bug#253030: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-13 ia64 is broken

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 253030 important
Bug#253030: depends on libc6 on ia64
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: severity of 78920 is normal

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 78920 normal
Bug#78920: nscd: nscd goes infinitely slow with heavy DNS traffic
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: changing bogus subject - sorry

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 255183 mpspec.h should include a more precise path to mach_mpspec.h.
Bug#255183: bla
Changed Bug title.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#255183: marked as done (mpspec.h should include a more precise path to mach_mpspec.h.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:37:44 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line using wrong headers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2004 11:06:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 19 04:06:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail1.bluewin.ch [195.186.1.74] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bbdfl-0001FZ-00; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 04:06:09 -0700
Received: from localhost (62.203.57.160) by mail1.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 
7.0.028)
id 40D19B9C0003BEA5; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:05:38 +
Received: from tpo by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbdfJ-0002lq-00; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:05:41 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bla
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:05:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-16
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

I'm not sure, but to me this looks like mpspec.h should include a more precise
path to mach_mpspec.h. The project I'm compiling here, has nothing to do with 
mach
whatsoever.

$ gcc kfusd.c -o kfusd.o
In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18,
 from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17,
 from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23,
 from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10,
 from kfusd.c:83:
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18,
 from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17,
 from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23,
 from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10,
 from kfusd.c:83:
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:9: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:10: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:19: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_type'
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to_type'
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in 
a function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: conflicting types for 
`mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: previous declaration of 
`mp_bus_id_to_pci_bus'
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:54: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a 
function)
In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:20,
 from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17,
 from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23,
 from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10,
 from kfusd.c:83:
/usr/include/asm/io_apic.h:120: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not 
in a function)
/usr/include/asm/io_apic.h:120: error: conflicting types for `mp_irqs'
/usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: previous declaration of `mp_irqs'
In file included from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17,
 from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23,
 from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10,
 from kfusd.c:83:
/usr/include/asm/smp.h:73:26: mach_apicdef.h: No such file or directory
$ gcc -c -I/usr/include/asm/mach-generic/ kfusd.c -o kfusd.o

Here's a suggestion for a patch. Mind you I've got absolutely no idea what I'm 
doing here, it's
just a barely educated guess.
*t

--- /usr/in

Processed: these are fixed upstream

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 230219 fixed-upstream
Bug#230219: [PATCH] libc6: SIGSEGV in sunrpc/pmap_prot2.c
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> tags 222130 fixed-upstream
Bug#222130: [PATCH] : fix invalid __libc_dlclose() in nsswitch.c
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#255846: debian sarge packaged mutt (v 1.5.6+20040523i) core dumping reading mail with foreign character set

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package mutt
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mutt

> reassign 255846 libc6
Bug#255846: mutt-1.5.6+20040523i: Core Dumps on opening mail with foreign 
character set
Bug reassigned from package `mutt' to `libc6'.

> package libc6
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libc6

> merge 254314 255846
Bug#254314: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances
Bug#255846: mutt-1.5.6+20040523i: Core Dumps on opening mail with foreign 
character set
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #254314 has `normal';
 #255846 has `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#255846: marked as done (mutt-1.5.6+20040523i: Core Dumps on opening mail with foreign character set)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:13:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255846: mutt-1.5.6+20040523i: Core Dumps on opening mail 
with foreign character set
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2004 12:20:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 23 05:20:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cordelia.ucd.ie (fiachra.iccsb) [137.43.12.54] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bd6jm-00011w-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:20:22 -0700
Received: from ravioli.iccsb ([192.168.0.3])
by fiachra.iccsb with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Bd6hD-00023m-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:17:43 +0100
Received: from gavin by ravioli.iccsb with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Bd6h2-00036G-00; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:17:32 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mutt-1.5.6+20040523i: Core Dumps on opening mail with foreign 
character set
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:17:32 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.6-20040523
Severity: important

-- Please type your report below this line

Hi,

Mutt crashes when you try to view a mail in a foreign character set.  It can
however handle it otherwise, moving, copying, display in index etc.

I will try and attach the mailbox gzipped.  If you don't get it let me know.

I also tried this on mutt 1.3.28i and it seems unaffected.

Gavin


-- System Information
System Version: Linux ravioli 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 
GNU/Linux

-- Build environment information

(Note: This is the build environment installed on the system
muttbug is run on.  Information may or may not match the environment
used to build mutt.)

- gcc version information
cc
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.4/specs
Configured with: ../src/configure -v 
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr 
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib 
--enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit 
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm 
--enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian)

- CFLAGS
-Wall -pedantic -g -O2

-- Mutt Version Information

Mutt 1.5.6+20040523i (2004-02-01)
Copyright (C) 1996-2002 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details.

System: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 (i686) [using ncurses 5.4] [using libidn 0.4.1 
(compiled with 0.4.1)]
Compile options:
-DOMAIN
+DEBUG
-HOMESPOOL  +USE_SETGID  +USE_DOTLOCK  +DL_STANDALONE  
+USE_FCNTL  -USE_FLOCK
+USE_POP  +USE_IMAP  +IMAP_EDIT_THREADS  -USE_GSS  -USE_SSL  +USE_GNUTLS  
+USE_SASL  +USE_SASL2  
+HAVE_REGCOMP  -USE_GNU_REGEX  
+HAVE_COLOR  +HAVE_START_COLOR  +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD  +HAVE_BKGDSET  
+HAVE_CURS_SET  +HAVE_META  +HAVE_RESIZETERM  
+CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP  +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME  -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME  
-BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS  -SUN_ATTACHMENT  
+ENABLE_NLS  -LOCALES_HACK  +COMPRESSED  +HAVE_WC_FUNCS  +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET 
 +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR  
+HAVE_ICONV  -ICONV_NONTRANS  +HAVE_LIBIDN  +HAVE_GETSID  +HAVE_GETADDRINFO  
ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell"
SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail"
MAILPATH="/var/mail"
PKGDATADIR="/usr/share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/etc"
EXECSHELL="/bin/sh"
MIXMASTER="mixmaster"
To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To report a bug, please use the flea(1) utility.

patch-1.5.3.rr.compressed.1
patch-1.5.5.1.tt.compat.1-cl
patch-1.5.5.1.nt.xtitles.3.ab.1
patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
patch-1.5.4.fw.maildir_inode_sort
patch-1.3.23.1.ametzler.pgp_good_sign
patch-1.5.3.Md.gpg_status_fd
patch-1.4.Md.gpg-agent
patch-1.5.3.Md.etc_mailname_gethostbyname
patch-1.5.1.cd.edit_threads.9.2
Md.use_debian_editor

Processed: It's in glibc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 237674 glibc
Bug#237674: sysklogd: Log format and encoding depends on caller's locale 
environment
Bug reassigned from package `sysklogd' to `glibc'.

> retitle 237674 glibc: syslog entry dates depend on locale
Bug#237674: sysklogd: Log format and encoding depends on caller's locale 
environment
Changed Bug title.

> tags 237674 patch
Bug#237674: glibc: syslog entry dates depend on locale
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> MfG,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> Stephan
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#256438: no alias for en_GB.ISO-8859-15 and en_GB.iso885915

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 256438 xlibs
Bug#256438: no alias for en_GB.ISO-8859-15 and en_GB.iso885915
Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `xlibs'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#256440: marked as done (LC_COLLATE broken using es_ES and es_ES@euro)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:22:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256440: LC_COLLATE broken using es_ES and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2004 03:40:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 26 20:40:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp08.auna.com (smtp08.retemail.es) [62.81.186.18] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BeQWe-0004bk-00; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:40:16 -0700
Received: from etsii.upm.es ([213.37.8.93]) by smtp08.retemail.es
  (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
  Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:39:43 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:39:42 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 
Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LC_COLLATE broken using es_ES and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: locales
Version: 2.2.5-11.5

When I invoke 'ls [A-Z][A-Z]*' trying to find files starting with 2 
upper-case letters, I obtain the listing of all the dir and its subdirs 
like if I invoked 'ls *'.
This happen when LC_COLLATE is set to 'es_ES' or '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (or 
LC_ALL="es_ES" or LC_ALL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]").
When LC_COLLATE is set to 'C' (LANG="es_ES" or LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and 
LC_ALL="") all goes all right.

More information: I am using also the package user-euro-es version 0.25 
(I do not know if this package would broke something).

Perhaps there is something wrong in '/usr/share/i18n/locales/es_ES' and 
'/usr/share/i18n/locales/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody), debian kernel 2.4.26-1 and 
libc6 2.2.5-11.5


---
Received: (at 256440-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 01:22:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 18:22:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bekr9-0006ez-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 18:22:47 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8BF25DEB58; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:22:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:22:46 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#256440: LC_COLLATE broken using es_ES and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:39:42 +0200,
Daniel Pe=F1a wrote:
> When I invoke 'ls [A-Z][A-Z]*' trying to find files starting with 2=20
> upper-case letters, I obtain the listing of all the dir and its subdirs=20
> like if I invoked 'ls *'.
> This happen when LC_COLLATE is set to 'es_ES' or '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (or=20
> LC_ALL=3D"es_ES" or LC_ALL=3D"[EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#256708: marked as done (locales: Locales hosed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256708: locales: Locales hosed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 16:35:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 28 09:35:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bunkkeri.net (bilbo) [62.220.235.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bez6k-0007p3-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:35:50 -0700
Received: from hendry by bilbo with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bez6l-0004FK-Sc; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:35:51 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: Locales hosed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:35:51 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: important


I wish I knew why all of a sudden locale prints the errors below.
It was working earlier today.

I tried to fix it with by :
sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales

No such luck. I even tried a different locale setting.

This bug is blocking my use of subversion.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB)

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.29   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-13]  2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = "en_GB",
LANG = "en_GB"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
* locales/default_environment_locale: en_GB.UTF-8
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_GB.ISO-8859-15 ISO-8859-15, en_GB.UTF-8 
UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8

---
Received: (at 256708-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 17:43:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 28 10:43:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bf0Ag-0005j1-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:43:58 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C6C70DEB80; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:57 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:43:57 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#256708: locales: Locales hosed
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:35:51 +0300,
Kai Hendry wrote:
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
>   LANGUAGE = (unset),
>   LC_ALL = "en_GB&

Bug#215764: marked as done (libc6 stops XDM client connections.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:19:09 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215764: libc6 stops XDM client connections.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 16:05:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 11:05:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.126] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9Rg7-0002Ch-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:05:43 -0500
Received: from user-0vvdbe1.cable.mindspring.com ([63.246.173.193] 
helo=mail.fortuitous.com)
by turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1A9Rg6-0005xA-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:05:42 -0700
Received: by mail.fortuitous.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 323074008DB; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:05:42 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:05:42 -0500
From: Phil Carinhas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 stops XDM client connections.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6 
Version: 2.3.2-8

Distro: Debian Unstable
Kernel: 2.4.21-rc6-xfs

Problem:
---

 Installing this package causes all XDM clients to fail to connect to
 the XDM server. This was discovered when upgrading Samba to the
 samba_3.0.0final-1  version, when it upgraded libc6.
 Below is the output of the xdm.log file that shows what is failing:

Temporary Solution: 
---
 
downgrade libc6 to 2.3.1-17
 

Sample Logs:


 Fri Oct 10 13:56:09 2003 xdm info (pid 311): starting X server on 
dhcp211.galaxy:1 -dhcp211.galaxy:: relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: 
symbol __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file 
libc.so.6 with link time reference
 Fri Oct 10 13:56:09 2003 xdm error (pid 311): display dhcp211.galaxy:1 (pid 
127) exited with unexpected status 7603
 Fri Oct 10 13:59:46 2003 xdm info (pid 311): starting X server on 
dhcp211.galaxy:1 -dhcp211.galaxy:: relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: 
symbol __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file 
libc.so.6 with link time reference
 Fri Oct 10 13:59:46 2003 xdm error (pid 311): display dhcp211.galaxy:1 (pid 
127) exited with unexpected status 7670
 Fri Oct 10 14:01:33 2003 xdm info (pid 311): starting X server on 
dhcp211.galaxy:1 -dhcp211.galaxy:: relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: 
symbol __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file 
libc.so.6 with link time reference

-Phil Carinhas
--
 ..
 | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas   | [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com   |
 | Linux Consulting & Training  | Tel : 1-512-218-9561|
 `'

---
Received: (at 215764-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 09:19:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 02:19:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfEli-0002JA-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:19:10 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8723CDEB58; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:19:09 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:19:09 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#215764: libc6 stops XDM client connections.
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - &quo

Bug#214349: marked as done (russian PO-file translation for glibc package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:17:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214349: russian PO-file translation for glibc package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2003 08:23:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 06 03:23:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ufamts.ru [213.24.116.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A6QeL-000203-00; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 03:23:25 -0500
Received: from nw132.bashtelecom.ru ([213.24.116.132] helo=localhost)
by mail.ufamts.ru with esmtp 
id 1A6QeK-0001y4-5O
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 14:23:24 +0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ilgiz Kalmetev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Perl script "po_send"
using Mail::Sender 0.7.14.1 by Jenda Krynicky
running on localhost (127.0.0.1)
under account ""
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:23:11 +0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: russian PO-file translation for glibc package
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: Multipart/Mixed;
boundary="Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1065428586"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1065428586
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline

Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2-8

This is new/fixed russian translation of po-file for glibc package.

--
  Ilgiz Kalmetev
--Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1065428586
Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="glibc_2.3.2-8.po"; type=Unknown;
Content-description: glibc_2.3.2-8.po
Content-transfer-encoding: BASE64
Content-disposition: attachment
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Bug#219102: marked as done (libc6: IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:28:48 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219102: libc6: IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2003 10:45:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 04 04:45:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (fw03.osa.de) [81.2.149.2] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGygn-0001rl-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 04:45:33 -0600
Received: (qmail 3 invoked by uid 0); 4 Nov 2003 10:45:31 -
Received: from lucifer.mgsft.com (HELO lucifer) (192.168.20.78)
  by fw03.osa.de with SMTP; 4 Nov 2003 10:45:31 -
Received: from crafterm by lucifer with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AGygl-sF-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:45:31 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:45:31 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9
Severity: normal

Hi There,

Since ds1-8 the IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps on startup. Here's a strace of
what's occuring:

execve("/usr/local/IBMJava2-131/bin/java", ["java"], [/* 56 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="lucifer", ...}) = 0
brk(0)  = 0x80e5a74
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x40017000
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)  = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=47190, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 47190, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40018000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libncurses.so.5", O_RDONLY)  = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\260\342"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=254544, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 255884, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40024000
old_mmap(0x4005a000, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x36000) = 0x4005a000
old_mmap(0x40062000, 1932, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40062000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY)   = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0P\34\0\000"..., 512) = 
512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=9796, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 8632, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40063000
old_mmap(0x40065000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x2000) = 0x40065000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0`^\1\000"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1243108, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 1253348, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40066000
old_mmap(0x4018d000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x126000) = 0x4018d000
old_mmap(0x40196000, 8164, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40196000
close(3)= 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x40198000
munmap(0x40018000, 47190)   = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
close(3)= 0
open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_

Bug#202161: marked as done (libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:55 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202161: libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 11:05:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 06:04:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eBzq-00031O-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 06:04:54 -0500
Received: from deathstar.imperialnet.mig (151.38.127.247) by smtp1.libero.it 
(7.0.012)
id 3ECB938A0130B080; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:05:00 +0200
Received: from executor.imperialnet.mig (executor.imperialnet.mig [192.168.5.3])
by deathstar.imperialnet.mig (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9B5E18EAF8; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by executor.imperialnet.mig (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 695B520402; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:04:49 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:04:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Hi, the iconv(1) manpage says:


--output, -o file

Specify output file (instead of stdin)
^^
It obviously should be "(instead of stdout)"

Thanks,

Guido



---
Received: (at 202161-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 09:38:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 02:38:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfF4q-0003Jk-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:38:56 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 96026DEB58; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:55 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:55 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#202161: libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:04:49 +0200,
Guido Trotter wrote:
> Hi, the iconv(1) manpage says:
> 
> --output, -o file
> 
> Specify output file (instead of stdin)
>   ^^
> It obviously should be "(instead of stdout)"

Thanks for your report, this bug was fixed in 2.3.2.ds1-8.
I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#241455: marked as done (xmms: dependency on libesd0 missing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not 
to start on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 12:25:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 01 04:25:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B91Fs-0007l2-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 04:25:09 -0800
Received: (qmail 13425 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Apr 2004 12:24:37 -
Received: from p5086FCB0.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO alf.mars) (80.134.252.176)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 01 Apr 2004 14:24:37 +0200
X-Authenticated: #14842608
Received: from helmut by alf.mars with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1B91FN-h3-2w; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:24:37 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xmms: dependency on libesd0 missing
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:24:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: important

Xmms schould depend on libesd0, because it won't start if not installed.
$ xmms
libesd.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72: 
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' 
failed!
$

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xmms depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2  1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2   1.2.10-16The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libice6 4.3.0-7  Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6  4.3.0-7  X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-64.3.0-7  X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext64.3.0-7  X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi6  4.3.0-7  X Window System Input extension li
ii  xlibs   4.3.0-7  X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 231403-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 09:58:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 02:58:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfFO3-00063E-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:58:47 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CD6C5DEB58; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mickael Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Matthew Parslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not to 
start on newer kernels/systems
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Versio

Bug#231403: marked as done (xmms fails to start with libc6 TLS libs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not 
to start on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 11:14:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 03:14:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from alhya.freenux.org (moria.freenux.org) [81.56.176.87] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ap3wm-0001Nw-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 03:14:57 -0800
Received: from alhya ([:::10.0.0.2])
  (IDENT: mail)
  by moria with esmtp; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:24:34 +0100
Received: from mikmak by alhya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ap3wq-yf-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:15:00 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mickael Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xmms fails to start with libc6 TLS libs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:14:59 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mickael Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.9-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

it seems that when using /lib/tls libraries , xmms won't start with the 
following error :

libmikmod.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72: 
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' 
failed!

doing : mv /lib/tls lib/tls.old and then running xmms makes it start normally.

that could be a libc6 bug maybe.

Cheers,
Mik

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2-rc3
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages xmms depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2  1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2   1.2.10-16The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  xlibs   4.2.1-16 X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 231403-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 09:58:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 02:58:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfFO3-00063E-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:58:47 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CD6C5DEB58; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mickael Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Matthew Parslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not to 
start on newer kernels/systems
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03

Bug#210356: marked as done (problem in libc-2.3.2-5_i386 crashes 3rd party application)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:11:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210356: Does this bug still occur?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2003 23:21:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 10 18:21:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw.activestate.com (smtp1.ActiveState.com) [209.17.183.249] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xEH4-0001bP-00; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:21:22 -0500
Received: from smtp3.ActiveState.com (smtp3.ActiveState.com [192.168.3.19])
by smtp1.ActiveState.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8AN33BV007493
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:03:03 -0700
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from exchange.activestate.ca ([192.168.3.54])
by smtp3.ActiveState.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8AN330X003633
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:03:03 -0700
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: problem in libc-2.3.2-5_i386 crashes 3rd party application
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:03:03 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: problem in libc-2.3.2-5_i386 crashes 3rd party application
Thread-Index: AcN376ryhUrGyt5rQxuLqnD3OytnEg==
From: "Jeff Griffiths" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc
Version: 2.3.2

this report came into ActiveState Technical support form a user=20
running Debian Sid and ActiveSTate Komodo 2.3:

There is a problem with the most recent build of libc6 on debian.=20
The version that was crashing Komodo was libc-2.3.2-5_i386, reverting=20
back to v2.3.2-3_i386 fixes these problems.

HTH

Jeff Griffiths
ActiveState Technical Support
http://www.ActiveState.com=20

---
Received: (at 210356-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 19:11:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 12:11:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfO19-0006ku-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:11:43 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 56D3BDEB58; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:11:42 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:11:42 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeff Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#210356: Does this bug still occur?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:27:25 -0700,
Jeff Griffiths wrote:
> sorry, no , i don't have a debian system available.

OK, so I close this bug for a while.  If you see the same problem,
please reopen this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#247118: marked as done (libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using -D_BSD_SOURCE)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:29:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247118: libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using 
-D_BSD_SOURCE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2004 12:29:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 03 05:29:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail0-105.ewetel.de (mail0.ewetel.de) [212.6.122.105] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BKcZm-0006Tw-00; Mon, 03 May 2004 05:29:38 -0700
Received: from majestix.konqueror.de (dynadsl-080-228-95-249.ewetel.net 
[80.228.95.249])
by mail0.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i43CSwQ4005661;
Mon, 3 May 2004 14:29:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from obelix.konqueror.de ([192.168.1.4])
by majestix.konqueror.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BKcaM-00019f-00; Mon, 03 May 2004 14:30:14 +0200
Received: from mkoch by obelix.konqueror.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BKcYo-00046I-00; Mon, 03 May 2004 14:28:38 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using -D_BSD_SOURCE
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 14:28:38 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-CheckCompat: OK
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal


I get a warning when compiling the following testapp:


#include 
#include 

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
kill(0,0);
return 0;
}


I use the this command line:


gcc -ansi -Wall -D_BSD_SOURCE -c killbug.c


The warning I get:


killbug.c: In function `main':
killbug.c:5: Warnung: implicit declaration of function 'kill'


In /usr/include/signal.h kill() is defined as follows:


#ifdef __USE_POSIX
extern int kill (__pid_t __pid, int __sig) __THROW;
#endif /* Use POSIX.  */


According to kill() manpage was defined on BSD 4.3 too.
This means it should be available with -D_BSD_SOURCE I think.

Is this correct ?


Michael


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (999, 'testing'), (10, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-obelix
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-15 Linux Kernel Headers for developme

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 247118-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 19:29:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 12:29:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfOIL-0008BV-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:29:29 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 24DCFDEB58; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:29:28 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:29:28 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#247118: libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using 
-D_BSD_SOURCE
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 re

Bug#25824: marked as done ([PR other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets full)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:59:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp 
gets full
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 1998 18:02:55 +
Received: (qmail 2621 invoked from network); 17 Aug 1998 18:02:54 -
Received: from pcsw104b.ukc.ac.uk (129.12.41.137)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Aug 1998 18:02:54 -
Received: from merry.bs.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by pcsw104b.ukc.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) with floppy id TAA27095;
Mon, 17 Aug 1998 19:02:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 19:02:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc: could give better error message when /tmp gets full.

Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.3-4.7
Severity: wishlist

merry$ gcc -Wall -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -I.  -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 
-DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 Test.c -o Test
cc1: /tmp/ccb04872: I/O error

This happened repeatedly when /tmp filled up during compilation (Test.c is
over a megabyte long)...  A better error message might mention "device
full" or some such.

-- 
Charles Briscoe-Smith
White pages entry, with PGP key: http://alethea.ukc.ac.uk/wp?95cpb4>
PGP public keyprint: 74 68 AB 2E 1C 60 22 94  B8 21 2D 01 DE 66 13 E2
---
Received: (at 25824-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 19:59:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 12:59:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfOlj-0003Xi-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:59:51 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 90AF2DEB58; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:59:50 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:59:50 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Bug other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp 
gets full
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> Package: gcc
> Version: 2.7.2.3-4.7
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> merry$ gcc -Wall -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -I.  -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 
> -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 Test.c -o Test
> cc1: /tmp/ccb04872: I/O error
> 
> This happened repeatedly when /tmp filled up during compilation (Test.c is
> over a megabyte long)...  A better error message might mention "device
> full" or some such.

Unfortunatelly it's not even glibc bug.  EIO/ENOSPC is returned from
kernel, so this bug is occured by buggy kernel or filesystems.  I
think this bug is too old to keep open.  I close this bug.  If you
reappear this bug, please provide us your kernel version and mounted
filesystem name.

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#156697: marked as done (libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments incorrectly)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:32:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156697: libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments 
incorrectly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 17:58:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 12:58:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 17dyn28.ztm.casema.net (fruit.eu.org) [213.17.32.28] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17f2Pu-0005oW-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:58:47 -0500
Received: (qmail 1376 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 17:58:42 -
Received: from unknown (10.1.3.4)
  by thunk.pooh.oi with QMQP; 14 Aug 2002 17:58:42 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments incorrectly
From: "Wessel Dankers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:58:40 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-13
Severity: normal

When I invoke posix_memalign() like this (pagesize == 4096, BUFSIZE == 12M):

char *s;
posix_memalign(&s, pagesize, BUFSIZE)

It fails, but does not set errno with a reason. However, when I invoke
it like this:

posix_memalign(&s, BUFSIZE, pagesize)

It succeeds, and allocates a suitable memory region (if I decrease
BUFSIZE below what my application really needs, it segfaults just as
one would expect). However, the allocated region is aligned to the size
of the allocated memory region (if I decrease BUFSIZE, the alignment
also becomes more lax).

The documentation states:

Function: int posix_memalign (void **memptr, size_t alignment, size_t 
size) 

...which means (I think( that the first thing I tried was the correct one.
These are the versions of gcc I tried:

gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
gcc version 3.0.4
gcc version 3.1.1
gcc version 3.2 20020809 (Debian prerelease)

I suspect that the fix is trivial :)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bzzrt 2.4.19-wsl #1 Tue Aug 6 04:13:00 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 156697-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 00:32:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 17:32:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfT1v-0002KH-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:32:52 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A4D75DEB58; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:32:50 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:32:50 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wessel Dankers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#156697: libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments incorrectly
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:58:40 +0200,
Wessel Dankers wrote:
> When I invoke posix_memalign() like this (pagesize == 4096, BUFSIZE == 12M):
> 
>   char *s;
>   posix_memalign(&s, pagesize, BUFSIZE)
> 
> It fails, but does not set errno with a reason. However, when I invoke

If it's failed, posix_memalign returns error, instead of setting errno.

> it like this:
> 
>   posix_memalign(&s, BUFSIZE, pagesize)
> 
> It succeeds, and allocates a suitable memory region (if I decrease
> BUFSIZE below what my application really needs, it segfaults just as
> one would expect). However, the allocated region is 

Bug#129500: marked as done (int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:52:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2002 12:51:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 16 06:51:41 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (bortas.appeal.se) [195.22.77.29] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16QpXY-0002fU-00; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:51:41 -0600
Received: from one.appeal.se (one.appeal.se [192.168.1.62])
by bortas.appeal.se (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0GCp9n15000;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:51:09 +0100
Received: from johan by one.appeal.se with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16QpSh-0006m3-00; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:46:39 +0100
From: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:46:39 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.2.4-7
Severity: normal

int64_t is defined as follows on 64 bit platforms:

in :  typedef long  int int64_t;
in : __extension__ typedef long long int int64_t;

I guess both types are of equal size, but it is annoying because gcc
warns differently about printf() format strings depending on which one
is used.

I would appreciate if one could be decided upon and used in both
places.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux one 2.4.7-ia64 #1 Tue Aug 7 21:03:33 MDT 2001 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6.1-dev depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


---
Received: (at 129500-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 03:52:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 20:52:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfW96-0006LE-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:52:28 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DF6DEB58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:52:27 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:52:27 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> Package: libc6.1-dev
> Version: 2.2.4-7
> Severity: normal
> 
> int64_t is defined as follows on 64 bit platforms:
> 
> in :  typedef long  int int64_t;
> in : __extension__ typedef long long int int64_t;
> 
> I guess both types are of equal size, but it is annoying because gcc
> warns differently about printf() format strings depending on which one
> is used.
> 
> I would appreciate if one could be decided upon and used in both
> places.

sys/types.h declaration is internal of:

#if !__GNUC_PREREQ (2, 7)

It means you use gcc < 2.7.  I think this declaration should be
depreciated.  These days we use at least gcc 2.7, and later.

> I vote for:
> 
>typedef long int int64_t;
> 
> Reason: On gcc/linux/ia64, size_t is a long int.  Having int64_t and 
> size_t resolve to the same type would simplify my printf():ing.

Yes, nowadays ILP32 and LP64 is the mainstream.  So size_t is a long
int on 64 bit architecture.

Debian/woody and sarge does not support gcc < 2.7.  So it should not
cause any problems.  I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom

Processed: libc6: Time zone information for Mexico not correct

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 142379 woody
Bug#142379: libc6: Time zone information for Mexico not correct
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: glibc-doc: return type of cfmakeraw is void, not int

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 16 woody
Bug#16: glibc-doc: return type of cfmakeraw is void, not int
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#139803: marked as done (missing contribution to the copyright file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line missing contribution to the copyright file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2002 08:40:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 25 02:40:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) 
[195.92.249.252] (exim)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16pQ1q-DF-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 02:40:34 -0600
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5)
id 16pQ1p-00043B-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:40:33 +
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:40:33 +
From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: missing contribution to the copyright file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-3

The `copyright' file does not include mention of the copyright of the
kernel headers which are included in the libc6-dev package by copying.
At least one of them claims to be covered by the GPL explicitly (acpi.h),
at least one is BSD-like (agp_backend.h), but most do not have explicit
headers.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.

---
Received: (at 139803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 04:01:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 21:01:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfWHU-0006VS-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:01:08 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD23DEB58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: missing contribution to the copyright file
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> The `copyright' file does not include mention of the copyright of the
> kernel headers which are included in the libc6-dev package by copying.
> At least one of them claims to be covered by the GPL explicitly (acpi.h),
> at least one is BSD-like (agp_backend.h), but most do not have explicit
> headers.

glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 does not include any kernel information,
linux-kernel-headers package has it.  It's separated from glibc
package.  linux-kernel-headers package has
/usr/share/doc/linux-kernel-headers/copyright.

I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#165896: marked as done (glibc: errors applying makeconfig and locale-es_AR patches)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:13:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165896: glibc: errors applying makeconfig and locale-es_AR 
patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 13:52:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 22 08:52:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web21308.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.128.174] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 183zS4-0007PF-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:52:08 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [24.90.250.110] by web21308.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 
2002 06:52:07 PDT
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Panofsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: glibc: errors applying makeconfig and locale-es_AR patches
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0
tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: *

Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: normal

The glibc source package refuses to build because two patches supplied have
problems.  This occurs in at least 2.3.1-2 & 2.3.1-3.
Here is a transcript of a build attempt:

dpkg-buildpackage: source package is glibc
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.3.1-3
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
debian/rules clean
mkdir i386-linux
sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%libc6%g' \
-e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%arm i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc sparc s390 hppa 
sh3 sh4
sh3eb sh4eb%g' < debian/control.in/libc > debian/control.in/libc6
sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%libc6.1%g;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%alpha ia64%g' < 
debian/control.in/libc >
debian/control.in/libc6.1
sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%libc0.3%g;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%hurd-i386%g;s/nscd, //' 
<
debian/control.in/libc > debian/control.in/libc0.3
sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%libc1%g;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%freebsd-i386%g' < 
debian/control.in/libc >
debian/control.in/libc1
cat debian/control.in/main  >  debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/libc6 >> debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/libc6.1   >> debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/libc0.3   >> debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/libc1 >> debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/sparc64   >> debian/controlT
cat debian/control.in/libc-udeb >> debian/controlT
sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%libc6%g;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%glibc%g' \
-e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@%alpha arm i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc sparc ia64
hppa s390 sh3 sh4 sh3eb sh4eb freebsd-i386%g' < debian/controlT >
debian/control
rm debian/controlT
mode of `debian/glibc-doc/DEBIAN/prerm' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/glibc-doc/DEBIAN/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc/DEBIAN/postrm' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc/DEBIAN/preinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc-dev/preinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc-opt/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc-opt/preinst.m4' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc-sparc64/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/postrm' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/nscd/DEBIAN/prerm' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/nscd/DEBIAN/postinst' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/nscd/DEBIAN/postrm' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/glibc-doc/usr/share/doc-base/glibc-manual' changed to 0644
(rw-r--r--)
mode of `debian/libc/DEBIAN/conffiles' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--)
mode of `debian/nscd/etc/init.d/nscd' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/locales/DEBIAN/conffiles' changed to 0644 (rw-r--r--)
mode of `debian/locales/usr/sbin/locale-gen' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc/etc/init.d/devpts.sh' changed to 0755 (rwxr-xr-x)
mode of `debian/libc/etc/default/devpts' changed to 0644 (rw-r-

Bug#205058: marked as done (samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list with libc6 2.3.2-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group 
list with libc6 2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2003 09:30:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 04:30:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from iwmutel.isd.dp.ua (fluffy.isd.dp.ua) [193.108.163.194] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19mVUJ-00072m-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:30:43 -0500
Received: from mwg by fluffy.isd.dp.ua with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19mVU7-0007xW-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:30:31 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-U"
From: Wladimir Mutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list with libc6 2.3.2-2
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:30:31 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid

Rolling back to libc6 2.3.1-17 helps. 
I look into /proc/N/status for smbd process, and with libc6 2.3.2-2 I see that 
last group in the "Groups:" list is the same as pre-last. With libc6 2.3.1-17 
this effect disappears. Like this :

Groups: 1 255 230 229 211 (with libc6 2.3.1-17)
Groups: 1 255 230 229 229 (with libc6 2.3.2-2)

Using "su" to switch to that user id does not show the same behaviour. i
May be there is something buggy in Samba as well.

We are also using NIS domain in "compat" nsswitch mode, and nscd for caching.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fluffy.isd.dp.ua 2.6.0-test2-mm4 #1 Tue Aug 5 10:11:27 EEST 2003 
i686
Locale: LANG=uk_UA, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 205058-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 00:27:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 17:27:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfpQl-00056A-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:27:59 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5E5C9DEB58; Thu,  1 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wladimir Mutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list 
with libc6 2.3.2-2
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:09:20 +0300,
Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:43:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
> > Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> > >   Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> > >   Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> > >   

Bug#221850: marked as done (libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2003 12:27:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 06:27:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp2.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.14] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMnuL-0006FT-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:27:37 -0600
Received: from posti.pp.htv.fi (posti.pp.htv.fi [212.90.64.50])
by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0402C296C08; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:37 +0200 (EET)
Received: from route.intranet (funkyware.pp.htv.fi [62.78.135.115])
by posti.pp.htv.fi (8.11.1 (Revision 1.5+JAGae91741+JAGae92668) 
/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hAKCRau10939;
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:36 +0200 (EET)
Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk)
by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AMnuI-000526-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:34 +0200
Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 
14:27:33 +0200
From: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:32 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important

Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper 
resolving of filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:

1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS mounting from 'remote:/path' no longer works; I end up having to specify 
'remote.domain:/path'.
3) Hotway (the Hotmail-to-POP3 gateway) no longer succeeds in fetching mail.

All those things used to work just fine, until about last weekend. They no 
longer do. 

Since resolving is largely dependant upon libc6, I have to conclude that the 
sliding of 2.3.2.ds1-10 into testing is
what causes those failures.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux omena 2.4.22-ben2 #1 ti syyskuun 23. 21:23:03 EEST 2003 ppc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 221850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 08:52:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 01 01:52:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from seven.fishpool.fi (hal.pp.fishpool.fi) [195.197.229.220] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfxIc-00030d-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:52:07 -0700
Received: from q-funk (helo=localhost)
by hal.pp.fishpool.fi with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BfxIb-0004hv-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin-=C9ric_Racine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Archive: encrypt
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: Martin-Eric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:

> At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900,
> GOTO Masanori wrote:
>

Bug#220706: marked as done (error in libc6 / sparc / sarge)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:36:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220706: error in libc6 / sparc / sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 08:56:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 14 02:56:05 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKZkK-00065w-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 02:56:04 -0600
Received: (qmail 25319 invoked by uid 0); 14 Nov 2003 08:56:03 -
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:56:03 +0100 (MET)
From: "Stephan Goll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: error in libc6 / sparc / sarge
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authenticated-IP: [193.31.19.130]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0
tests=BANG_MORE,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-9-sparc

Hi,
last weeks I tried to upgrade my sparc station 1+ from woody to sarge. 
Downloading went fine, but the upgrade itself crashed. When it came 
to replace the libc6 an error occured when executing the postremove 
script from the old libc6. It seems that the glibc files are not installed 
correctly (or they may not matching my architecture, sun4c), so that 
the shell script cannot be executed. I have no clue how to fix it ...
Best regards,
Stephan

-- 
NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien...
Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net

+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++


---
Received: (at 220706-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 17:36:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 01 10:36:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bg5UD-0006fB-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:36:37 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7DA74DEB58; Fri,  2 Jul 2004 02:36:36 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:36:36 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephan Goll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#220706: error in libc6 / sparc / sarge
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:56:03 +0100 (MET),
Stephan Goll wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2-9-sparc
> 
> Hi,
> last weeks I tried to upgrade my sparc station 1+ from woody to sarge. 
> Downloading went fine, but the upgrade itself crashed. When it came 
> to replace the libc6 an error occured when executing the postremove 
> script from the old libc6. It seems that the glibc files are not installed 
> correctly (or they may not matching my architecture, sun4c), so that 
> the shell script cannot be executed. I have no clue how to fix it ...

Unfortunatelly, debian sparc porters decided to drop sun4c support
from sarge, because the hw multiplication was enabled.  IIRC, there's
no fix.  Please use woody.  I close this bug...

Regards,
-- gotom

Processed: tagging 146489

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 146489 fixed-upstream
Bug#146489: libc6: PPC ld.so: missing icache flushes cause occasionnal SEGV's
Tags were: upstream patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#135182: marked as done (libc6: gethostbyname2(inet6) trashes pointer when multiple addrs in /etc/hosts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jul 2004 20:43:19 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: gethostbyname2(inet6) trashes pointer when multiple 
addrs in /etc/hosts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2002 12:49:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 06:49:38 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 209-6-22-64.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (raeburn.org) 
[209.6.22.64] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16eF8r-00050p-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 06:49:37 -0600
Received: from rsx-11.raeburn.org ([18.101.0.232])
by raeburn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g1MCnQZ23069;
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:49:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from raeburn by rsx-11.raeburn.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16eF8f-0004qE-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:49:25 -0500
From: Ken Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: gethostbyname2(inet6) trashes pointer when multiple addrs in 
/etc/hosts
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.42
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.42
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:49:25 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-3
Severity: normal

I found this while looking into why "ping6" always crashed on my
laptop when I tried to ping one of my machines.  The target machine in
question is listed in /etc/hosts with both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses,
two of each.  My nsswitch.conf file includes:

hosts: files dns

so the hosts file is consulted first.

The ping6 program uses gethostbyname2 with an AF_INET6 argument.  My
simple test program using that function and test /etc/hosts entry
shows similar problems:

% cat test2.c
#include 
#include 

int main (int argc, char *argv[]) {
int i, j;
struct hostent *hp = gethostbyname2 (argv[1], AF_INET6);
if (hp == 0) { printf ("host unknown\n"); return 1; }
for (i = 0; hp->h_addr_list[i]; i++) {
printf ("address @%p: ", hp->h_addr_list[i]), fflush (stdout);
for (j = 0; j < hp->h_length; j++)
printf (" %02x", 0xff & hp->h_addr_list[i][j]);
printf ("\n");
}
}
% grep foo.bar /etc/hosts
1234:5::abcd foo.bar
2345:6::abcd foo.bar
% ./test2 foo.bar
address @0xcdab: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Exit 139
% 

The first pointer in the h_addr_list array is bogus.  From the value
of the pointer's bytes, and some experimentation, it appears that the
pointer is being overwritten with the low four bytes of the last IPv6
address listed.  The other pointers are okay, and do point to the
correct 2nd through Nth addresses in file order.

The problem goes away if there's only one IPv6 address for the host in
the hosts file.  Things also work fine if I delete the hosts file
entries altogether and fall back to DNS (but I'd rather not, since I
don't have PTR records).

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rsx-11 2.4.16 #3 Wed Dec 12 23:39:39 MST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 135182-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2004 11:43:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 04:43:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BgMRs-0001GJ-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 04:43:20 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2958DEB58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  2 Jul 2004 20:43:19 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 20:43:19 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libc6: gethostbyname2(inet6) trashes pointer when multiple addrs 
in /etc/hosts
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAss

Bug#136962: marked as done (libc6-dev: mismatch between _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX and sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 02 Jul 2004 20:38:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6-dev: mismatch between _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX and 
sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 16:56:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 10:56:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from as5800-82-75.access.naxs.com (silk.kitenet.net) [216.98.82.75] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16iIEp-0006O4-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 10:56:31 -0600
Received: from joey by silk.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16iIHY-0003My-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:59:20 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: mismatch between _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX and 
sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX)
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:59:19 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-3
Severity: normal

The LSB (well, POSIX) test suite gets its panties in a knot over the
differing values of _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX (6) and sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX)
(which is 3 at least if you run it in a program that hasn't done
anything to cause glibc to change the max). It seems that posix requires
the the sysconf call return a value that is >= _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX.

Given the way glibc changes the later on the fly I can't tell what a
good fix would be, either changing the default value returned by the
sysconf to 6, or changing _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX to 3.

This problem is not debian specific.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux silk 2.4.18 #1 Tue Feb 26 00:23:37 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


---
Received: (at 136962-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2004 11:38:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 04:38:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BgMMu-0007zB-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 04:38:12 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65629DEB80
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  2 Jul 2004 20:38:10 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 20:38:10 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libc6-dev: mismatch between _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX and 
sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX)
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This bug has been fixed in the latest glibc 2.3.2.ds-13.  I close this
bug.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/136962> cat test.c
#include 
#include 
#include 

int main(void)
{
int ret;

ret = sysconf(_SC_TZNAME_MAX);
printf("%d %d\n", ret, _POSIX_TZNAME_MAX);
return 0;
}

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/136962> gcc -o test test.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/136962> ./test
6 6

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#226633: marked as done (libc6: selecting en_CA in dpkg-reconfigure locales does not enable en_CA locale support.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 03 Jul 2004 00:34:25 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226633: libc6: selecting en_CA in dpkg-reconfigure locales 
does not enable en_CA locale support.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2004 18:16:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 07 12:16:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ocelot.spots.ab.ca [209.115.174.244] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AeHio-00032p-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:43:58 -0600
Received: from infidel.spots.ab.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [209.115.174.108])
by ocelot.spots.ab.ca (8.12.8/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i07HhpsW006916;
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:43:52 -0700
Received: from keeling by infidel.spots.ab.ca with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AeHiX-0004lQ-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:43:41 -0700
From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: selecting en_CA in dpkg-reconfigure locales does not enable 
en_CA locale support.
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:43:41 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-11.5
Severity: normal

Please be patient; this is my first run-in with reportbug.

As root, I selected en_CA in "dpkg-reconfigure locales".  As user, I
added:

LC_ALL="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LANG="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LANGUAGE="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"

to my ~/.bash_profile, logged out then back in.  The environment
variables were there.  On running a perl program, I learned they weren't
really there:

  ---
(0) keeling /home/keeling_ locale
LANG=en_CA.ISO-8859-1
LC_CTYPE="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_NUMERIC="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_TIME="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_COLLATE="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_MONETARY="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_MESSAGES="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_PAPER="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_NAME="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_ADDRESS="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
LC_ALL=en_CA.ISO-8859-1
(0) keeling /home/keeling_ things
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = "en_CA.ISO-8859-1",
LC_ALL = "en_CA.ISO-8859-1",
LC_CTYPE = "",
LANG = "en_CA.ISO-8859-1"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale
("C").
  ---

The fix was to, as root:

   edit /etc/locale.gen

   add "en_CA ISO-8859-1"

   edit /etc/locale.alias

   add "en_CA   en_CA.ISO-8859-1"

   run "locale-gen"


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux infidel 2.4.16 #2 Mon Dec 1 10:27:09 MST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_CA.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.ISO-8859-1


---
Received: (at 226633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2004 15:34:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 08:34:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BgQ3X-0007BH-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:34:27 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D7EDCDEB58; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 00:34:25 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 00:34:25 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#226633: libc6: selecting en_CA in dpkg-reconfigure loca

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 201650 moreinfo
Bug#201650: libc6.1: Missing libdb.so.2.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tags 221510 moreinfo
Bug#221510: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tags 222183 moreinfo
Bug#222183: Circular reference in ldconfig cache
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 210669 moreinfo
Bug#210669: libc6 2.3.2 breaks 3rd party program IBM ViaVoice's cmdlinespeak
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#212697: static linking with lpthread and system call causes crash

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 212697 woody
Bug#212697: static linking with lpthread and system call causes crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#237681: this bug is not reproducible on Gentoo

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 237681 confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#237681: sed: SEGV with UTF locale on specific byte sequence 789 bytes and 
specific command
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#213384: marked as done (libc6 2.3.2 causes wine-based programs to segfault on startup )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jul 2004 03:40:17 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213384: libc6 2.3.2 causes wine-based programs to segfault 
on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2003 04:01:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 29 23:01:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-207-112-58-239.tor.primus.ca (ufo.dyndns.excess.org) 
[207.112.58.239] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A4BhU-0003ZG-00; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:01:24 -0500
Received: from ian by ufo.dyndns.excess.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A4Blo-0001TZ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:05:52 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:05:52 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 2.3.2 causes wine-based programs to segfault on startup 
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
From: Ian Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-8

After upgrading to libc6 2.3.2-5 I found that I could no longer start
CorelDRAW 9 or Crossover Plugin 1.1.3 plugin setup or loki uninstall
binary

These programs give no helpful error messages, and aren't open source,
so there isn't much I can say other than that CorelDRAW hung on its
usual startup screen, Crossover said "Child process exited abnormally"
and the loki uninstaller immediately seg faulted.

The same problem exists with libc6 2.3.2-8.  The problem went away
when I downgraded to libc6 2.3.1-14

This may be related to bug #204706 (libc6: Binary incompatibility)

I am using kernel 2.4.21 on i686

Here is the strace of the loki uninstaller
--
execve("./uninstall", ["./uninstall"], [/* 30 vars */]) = 0
fcntl(0, F_GETFD)   = 0
fcntl(1, F_GETFD)   = 0
fcntl(2, F_GETFD)   = 0
personality(0 /* PER_??? */)= 0
geteuid()   = 1000
getuid()= 1000
getegid()   = 1000
getgid()= 1000
brk(0)  = 0x810174c
brk(0x810176c)  = 0x810176c
brk(0x8102000)  = 0x8102000
getpid()= 5674
geteuid()   = 1000
socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, path="/var/run/.nscd_socket"}, 110) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
close(3)= 0
open("/etc/nsswitch.conf", O_RDONLY)= 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=465, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x4000
read(3, "# /etc/nsswitch.conf\n#\n# Example"..., 4096) = 465
brk(0x8103000)  = 0x8103000
read(3, "", 4096)   = 0
close(3)= 0
munmap(0x4000, 4096)= 0
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)  = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=61736, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 61736, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libnss_compat.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=27252, ...}) = 0
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\\22\0"..., 4096) = 
4096
old_mmap(NULL, 30348, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001
mprotect(0x40017000, 1676, PROT_NONE)   = 0
old_mmap(0x40017000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x6000) = 0x40017000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libnsl.so.1", O_RDONLY)  = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=73260, ...}) = 0
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\20<\0\000"..., 4096) = 
4096
old_mmap(NULL, 84672, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40018000
mprotect(0x4002a000, 10

Bug#210669: marked as done (libc6 2.3.2 breaks 3rd party program IBM ViaVoice's cmdlinespeak)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jul 2004 12:17:32 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210669: other apps also break
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2003 20:06:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 12 15:06:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a3hr6fay45cl.bc.hsia.telus.net (cyclops.implode.net) 
[216.232.206.119] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xuB7-0007rl-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:06:01 -0500
Received: from gambit.implode.net ([192.168.1.2])
by cyclops.implode.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 )
id 19xuB4-k3-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:05:58 -0700
Received: from jbondjr by gambit.implode.net with local (Exim 4.22)
id 19xuB5-Cb-Ml
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:05:59 -0700
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:05:59 -0700
From: John Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 2.3.2 breaks 3rd party program IBM ViaVoice's cmdlinespeak
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: John Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,UPPERCASE_25_50
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-6

cmdlinkespeak worked fine with libc6-2.3.1-17.  It started seg faulting with
2.3.2 (frist version tried was 2.3.2-2).  cmdlinespeak still seg faults
with 2.3.2-6.  When I attempt to keep the system at libc6-2.3.1-17, apt
breaks as well as perl and others.

This problem is also brought up in with RedHat:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98768

Below is the strace:

execve("/usr/local/bin/cmdlinespeak", ["cmdlinespeak", "test"], [/* 25 vars 
*/]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="bumblebee", ...}) = 0
brk(0)  = 0x8049eb8
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0x40015000
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)  = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=18932, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 18932, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40016000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY)   = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0 \34\0\000"..., 512) = 
512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=9796, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 8632, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001b000
old_mmap(0x4001d000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x2000) = 0x4001d000
close(3)= 0
open("/usr/lib/libibmeci50.so", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\240O\1"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=411814, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 334756, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001e000
old_mmap(0x4005e000, 65536, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x3f000) = 0x4005e000
old_mmap(0x4006e000, 7076, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4006e000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libpthread.so.0", O_RDONLY)  = 3
read(3, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=80827, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 327652, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4007
old_mmap(0x4007d000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0xd000) = 0x4007d000
old_mmap(0x4007e000, 270308, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4007e000
close(3)= 0
open("/usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0`\233\1"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=288444, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 296584, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x400c
old_mmap(0x400f6000, 69632, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x36000) = 0x400f6000
old_mmap(0x40107000, 

Bug#221510: marked as done (emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:10:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221510: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2003 20:31:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 18 14:31:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel8.hp.com [156.153.255.206] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMCV9-0004KZ-00; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:31:07 -0600
Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp1.fc.hp.com [15.15.136.127])
by atlrel8.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059991C00ED1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:31:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30])
by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 766FB3889A; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:31:04 -0700 (MST)
Received: from debian (krebs.dannf [10.8.0.7])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4D9601340A9; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:31:04 -0700 (MST)
Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 20800)
id 0F238396381; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:31:03 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:31:03 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: emacs21
Version: 21.3+1-4
Severity: normal

running ls in shell mode on ia64 results in the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls
init.c:259: __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal: Assertion 
`__default_stacksize % __sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE) == 0' failed.
Aborted

To reproduce:
 1) run emacs
 2) meta-x shell
 3) ls


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux krebs 2.6.0-test5krebs #1 Tue Sep 9 16:25:11 MDT 2003 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages emacs21 depends on:
ii  emacs21-common  21.3+1-4 The GNU Emacs editor's common infr
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10.0.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg62   6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libncurses5 5.3.20030719-4   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.5.0-4PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff3g   3.5.7-2  Tag Image File Format library
ii  xaw3dg  1.5+E-6  Xaw3d widget set
ii  xlibs   4.3.0-0pre1v3X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g  1:1.1.4-17   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 221510-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 00:10:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 04 17:10:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhH3g-0007gC-00; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:10:09 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6BF38DEB58; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 09:10:07 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:10:07 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#221510: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; cha

Bug#200076: marked as done (libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:52:04 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA (FWD)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2003 20:06:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 04 15:06:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from picard.ee.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.42.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19YWpN-0005A1-00; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 15:06:41 -0500
Received: from dave.r.ee.ucl.ac.uk (reblochon [128.40.42.180])
by picard.ee.ucl.ac.uk (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h64K6GJ28559
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 21:06:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from john.r.ee.ucl.ac.uk
([192.168.1.10] helo=face.ee.ucl.ac.uk ident=mail)
by dave.r.ee.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19YWox-p2-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:06:15 +0100
Received: from weaves by face.ee.ucl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19YWox-000688-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:06:15 +0100
From: Walter Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA 
X-Debbugs-CC: Walter Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Walter Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:06:15 +0100
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "Sender" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-11.5
Severity: normal

I was hoping that router alert (RFC2113) was supported by libc6. It's
supported in the Linux kernel.

This is the code:

  if (setsockopt(sd, IPPROTO_IP,
 IPOPT_RA,
 (void *)&on, sizeof(on))) {
exit(1);
  }
  
  if (sendto(sd, inbuf.s, inbuf.lenb, 0,
 (struct sockaddr *)&destaddr, sizeof(destaddr)) < 0) {
perror("inject: sendto");
exit(1);
  }

and this is the strace output:

socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
setsockopt(4, SOL_IP, 0x94 /* IP_??? */, [0], 4) = -1 ENOPROTOOPT (Protocol not 
available)
_exit(1)= ?

And it is libc6 for the program:

face:/a/face/homes/face/disk00/tsg/share/weaves/fain-snap-0.9/src/ctl
 193$ ldd inject
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4001f000)
libsnmp-0.4.2.so => /usr/lib/libsnmp-0.4.2.so (0x40022000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4007e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4009f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux face 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Fri Jun 6 22:41:17 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

---
Received: (at 200076-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 00:52:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 04 17:52:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhHiH-0002NL-00; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:52:05 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B3482DEB58; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 09:52:04 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:52:04 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'GOTO Masanori'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Walter Eaves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA (FWD)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.

Processed: Re: Bug#257658: locales bug

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 257658 locales
Bug#257658: locales in testing: fails during compile of locales
Warning: Unknown package 'in'
Warning: Unknown package 'testing'
Bug reassigned from package `locales in testing' to `locales'.

> merge 257658 246270
Bug#246270: locales: byn_ER.UTF-8 cannot be generated
Bug#257658: locales in testing: fails during compile of locales
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #246270 has `normal';
 #257658 has `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#254314: narrowing down the bug

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 254314 confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#254314: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 202197 confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#202197: libc6-dev: _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING should be defined to -1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#178960: marked as done (libc6-dev: sys/stat.h: lstat declaration omitted with -ansi compiler option)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:30:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#178960: libc6-dev: sys/stat.h: lstat declaration omitted 
with -ansi compiler option
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2003 19:08:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 29 13:07:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (l1.bsrd.net) [66.153.99.6] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18dxYx-0001eq-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:07:56 -0600
Received: (qmail 4700 invoked by uid 1001); 29 Jan 2003 19:07:55 -
Date: 29 Jan 2003 19:07:55 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jeff Sheinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: sys/stat.h: lstat declaration omitted with -ansi compiler 
option
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
X-Debbugs-CC: Jeff Sheinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal

Hi,

When I include  and also specify the "-ansi" option to
the C compiler, then the declaration for the "lstat" function is
omitted.

Note that the declaration for the "fstat" function is properly
generated, regardless of whether the "-ansi" option is specified
or not.

Here is the simplest test case that I could come up with,

227 jeff ~ $  echo '#include ' | gcc-2.95  -c - -E | grep
-e [fl]stat
extern int fstat (int __fd, struct stat *__buf)  ;
extern int lstat (__const char *__restrict __file,
extern __inline__ int lstat (__const char *__path,
extern __inline__ int fstat (int __fd, struct stat *__statbuf)

228 jeff ~ $  echo '#include ' | gcc-2.95 -ansi -c - -E |
grep  -e [fl]stat
extern int fstat (int __fd, struct stat *__buf)  ;
extern __inline__ int fstat (int __fd, struct stat *__statbuf)

Here is an excerpt from "/usr/include/sys/stat.h", where the
declarations for "[fl]stat" are (supposed to be) generated,

 198: #ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
 199: /* Get file attributes for FILE and put them in BUF.  */
 200: extern int stat (__const char *__restrict __file,
 201:  struct stat *__restrict __buf) __THROW;
 202:
 203: /* Get file attributes for the file, device, pipe, or socket
 204:that file descriptor FD is open on and put them in BUF.  */
 205: extern int fstat (int __fd, struct stat *__buf) __THROW;
 206: #else
 207: # ifdef __REDIRECT
 208: extern int __REDIRECT (stat,
 209:(__const char *__restrict __file,
 210: struct stat *__restrict __buf) __THROW,
 211:stat64);
 212: extern int __REDIRECT (fstat, (int __fd, struct stat *__buf) __THROW, fsta
t64);
 213: # else
 214: #  define stat stat64
 215: #  define fstat fstat64
 216: # endif
 217: #endif
 218: #ifdef __USE_LARGEFILE64
 219: extern int stat64 (__const char *__restrict __file,
 220:struct stat64 *__restrict __buf) __THROW;
 221: extern int fstat64 (int __fd, struct stat64 *__buf) __THROW;
 222: #endif
 223:
 224: #if defined __USE_BSD || defined __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED
 225: # ifndef __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
 226: /* Get file attributes about FILE and put them in BUF.
 227:If FILE is a symbolic link, do not follow it.  */
 228: extern int lstat (__const char *__restrict __file,
 229:   struct stat *__restrict __buf) __THROW;
 230: # else
 231: #  ifdef __REDIRECT
 232: extern int __REDIRECT (lstat,
 233:(__const char *__restrict __file,
 234: struct stat *__restrict __buf) __THROW,
 235:lstat64);
 236: #  else
 237: #   define lstat lstat64
 238: #  endif
 239: # endif
 240: # ifdef __USE_LARGEFILE64
 241: extern int lstat64 (__const char *__restrict __file,
 242: struct stat64 *__restrict __buf) __THROW;
 243: # endif
 244: #endif

Note that I also tried the same test case as above, but in
addition, I also included  as the first include
statement, and I got the same same results, ie, the "lstat"
declaration was not generated.

I found this bug by using the C compiler's "-Wmissing-prototypes"
option.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Sheinberg


-- S

Bug#190638: marked as done (libc6-dev: out-of-date linux headers (linux/ethtool.h))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:20:43 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190638: out of date headers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 20:32:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 15:32:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hq.voxel.net (nrop) [66.109.37.2] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 198nO7-L5-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:32:11 -0500
Received: by nrop (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4D09BBFEEF; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: out-of-date linux headers (linux/ethtool.h)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:32:09 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: normal

/usr/include/linux/ethtool.h should be the same across all
architectures, as it's pulled from the kernel's include/linux directory.
However, it would appear that the m68k package has an out-of-date
ethtool.h file (and I suspect others) that's keeping my package
(keepalived) from building.  Here's part of 2.3.1-16, m68k vs i386:


--- linux/ethtool.h 2003-03-25 00:01:42.0 -0500
+++ /usr/include/linux/ethtool.h2003-04-20 13:37:28.0
-0400
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
  *
  * Copyright (C) 1998 David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
  * Copyright 2001 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * Portions Copyright 2001 Sun Microsystems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+ * Portions Copyright 2002 Intel ([EMAIL PROTECTED],
+ *[EMAIL PROTECTED],
+ *[EMAIL PROTECTED])
  */
  
 #ifndef _LINUX_ETHTOOL_H
@@ -25,17 +29,21 @@
u32 reserved[4];
 };
  
+#define ETHTOOL_BUSINFO_LEN32
 /* these strings are set to whatever the driver author decides... */
 struct ethtool_drvinfo {
u32 cmd;
chardriver[32]; /* driver short name, "tulip",
"eepro100" */
charversion[32];/* driver version string */
charfw_version[32]; /* firmware version string, if
applicable */
-   charbus_info[32];   /* Bus info for this interface.  For PCI
-* devices, use pci_dev->slot_name. */
+   charbus_info[ETHTOOL_BUSINFO_LEN];  /* Bus info for this IF.
*/
+   /* For PCI devices, use
pci_dev->slot_name. */
charreserved1[32];
-   charreserved2[28];
-   u32 regdump_len;/* Amount of data from ETHTOOL_GREGS */
+   charreserved2[16];
+   u32 n_stats;/* number of u64's from ETHTOOL_GSTATS
*/
+   u32 testinfo_len;
+   u32 eedump_len; /* Size of data from ETHTOOL_GEEPROM
(bytes) */
+   u32 regdump_len;/* Size of data from ETHTOOL_GREGS
(bytes) */
 };


I'm not quite sure how they managed to be different, I would've assumed
that glibc had the linux headers originate from the same place (and not
be in per-arch locations).  But, I guess not.  Anyways, it would be good
if the linux directory was updated to be the same across all archs.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux nrop 2.4.20-ben7 #15 Sat Mar 1 15:37:39 EST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 190638-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 10:20:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 03:20:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhQaa-0002C2-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 03:20:44 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp 

Bug#40263: marked as done (mntent.h missing MNTTYPE_PROC, MNTTYPE_AUTO)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:55:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#40263: Please provide more detail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 1999 16:42:07 +
Received: (qmail 4955 invoked from network); 27 Jun 1999 16:42:06 -
Received: from marbles.thok.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 1999 16:42:06 -
Received: from eichin by marbles.thok.org with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian))
id 10yI0E-00064K-00; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:41:58 -0400
From: "Mark W. Eichin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mntent.h missing MNTTYPE_PROC, MNTTYPE_AUTO
Full-Name: "Mark W. Eichin"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=NIL
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:41:58 -0400

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.1.1-12

mntent.h should have, at least, MNTTYPE_PROC and MNTTYPE_AUTO, in
addition to the ones there (it may be missing more, but those were the
obvious ones.)  The lack of MNTTYPE_PROC causes a bug in mtools 
(mzip -w fails trying to stat "proc" - it *has* code to check for
MNTTYPE_PROC, but the define isn't there.)
---
Received: (at 40263-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 10:55:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 03:55:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhR8g-0004tc-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 03:55:58 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF53CDEB58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 19:55:57 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:55:57 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#40263: Please provide more detail
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> mntent.h should have, at least, MNTTYPE_PROC and MNTTYPE_AUTO, in
> addition to the ones there (it may be missing more, but those were the
> obvious ones.)  The lack of MNTTYPE_PROC causes a bug in mtools 
> (mzip -w fails trying to stat "proc" - it *has* code to check for
> MNTTYPE_PROC, but the define isn't there.)

No.  mtools should check the existence of MNTTYPE_* because it's
different on various OSes.  There's no reason to add for glibc because
its variable depends on kernel.  In addition at least Solaris and
FreeBSD does not support them.

Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#104227: marked as done (ia64 has problems with _syscall2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ia64 has problems with _syscall2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2001 21:13:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 16:13:53 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rover.gag.com [:::192.133.104.32] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15K4pN-00050x-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:13:53 -0500
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7184F3C36C; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:13:49 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ia64 doesn't have pivot_root
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:13:49 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: util-linux
Version: util-linux_2.11g-4
Severity: serious

It appears that ia64 does not support pivot_root, which makes the build fail
with

install: cannot stat `mount/pivot_root': No such file or directory

Marking it RC since this is a can't build from source and we intend to release
ia64 with woody.

Bdale

---
Received: (at 104227-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 11:07:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 04:07:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhRJZ-0005PF-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 04:07:14 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 29793DEB58; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ia64 has problems with _syscall2
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> It appears that ia64 does not support pivot_root, which makes the build fail
> with
> 
>   install: cannot stat `mount/pivot_root': No such file or directory
> 
> Marking it RC since this is a can't build from source and we intend to release
> ia64 with woody.

Nowadays we have woody.  These bugs are too old.  I believe they were
already fixed, so I close these bugs.

If you have objection, please reopen and explain what the problem is.
Note that asm/unistd.h is derived from kernel headers.

Regards,
-- gotom 

Bug#105098: marked as done (ia64 has problems with _syscall2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ia64 has problems with _syscall2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 05:43:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 00:43:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com [:::156.153.255.202] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15LICm-00028e-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:43:04 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468CAAB6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
id 56E731872C; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:42:57 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build failure on ia64 (at least)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:42:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: util-linux
Version: 2.11g-4
Priority: serious

Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody.  As the
Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.

The following build failure occured on ia64 (using gcc 2.96):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
cryptic buildd database entries.

If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
other platforms.  With gcc 3.0, of course.

If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
see the current autotools-dev package.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux ia 2.4.5rgh1 #1 Sun Jun 24 20:39:18 MDT 2001 ia64 unknown

base/util-linux_2.11g-4 by bdale-ia64 [required:out-of-date]
  Reasons for failing:
[Category: none]
ia64 doesn't support pivot_root, bug filed

---
Received: (at 104227-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 11:07:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 04:07:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhRJZ-0005PF-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 04:07:14 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 29793DEB58; Mon,  5 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ia64 has problems with _syscall2
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

> It appears that ia64 does not support pivot_root, which makes the build fail
> with
> 
>   install: cannot stat `mount/pivot_root': No such file or directory
> 
> Marking it RC since this is a can't build from source and we intend to release
> ia64 with woody.

Nowadays we have woody.  These bugs are too old.  I believe they were
already fixed, so I close these bugs.

If you have objection, please reopen and explain what the problem is.
Note that asm/unistd.h is derived from kernel headers.

Regards,
-- gotom 

Processed: Re: Bug#257244: /usr/bin/zdump: zdump Foo returns GMT rather than an error.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 257244 wishlist
Bug#257244: /usr/bin/zdump: zdump Foo returns GMT rather than an error.
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#257807: locales: Garbled display during locale configuration

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 257807 debconf
Bug#257807: locales: Garbled display during locale configuration
Bug reassigned from package `locales' to `debconf'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#203340: Segfault in Samba

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 203340 moreinfo
Bug#203340: Segfault in Samba
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tags 203543 moreinfo
Bug#203543: illegal instruction triggered by grep inside ld-linux.so.2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 207266 confirmed, fixed-upstream
Bug#207266: libc6: Norwegian translation confuses free-as-in-freedom and 
free-as-in-beer.
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#184762: marked as done (libc6-dev exposes "long long" to non-GNU compilers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:08:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184762: libc6-dev exposes "long long" to non-GNU compilers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 15:35:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 14 09:35:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tripoint.kitware.com (hythloth.kitwarein.com) [24.97.130.20] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18trD9-0006Yc-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:35:07 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hythloth.kitwarein.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376D72D14
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:34:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:34:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6-dev exposes "long long" to non-GNU compilers
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-14

The debian patch "cvs.dpatch" adds an upstream line to

  sysdeps/generic/bits/types.h

The line looks like this:

#define __UQUAD_TYPEunsigned long long int

other changes in the patch proceed to use __UQUAD_TYPE in places not
protected by "#ifdef __GNUC__" preprocessor statements.  I looked in glibc
2.3.2 and found the same lines, but I'm reporting the bug here first in
case the patch didn't get all the necessary changes to avoid this problem.

I use the "Comeau C++" compiler (www.comeaucomputing.com), which is a
non-GNU C++ compiler with strict ISO C++ conformance.  It does not support
the "long long" type unless a special compiler flag is added.  The
following lines show the problem I originally encountered:

$ cat > t1.cxx <
EOF
$ como t1.cxx
"/usr/include/bits/types.h", line 131: error: the type "long long" is
  nonstandard
  typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers.  */

This problem just started when I updated to version 2.3.1-14 of the
libc6-dev package.  The previous version did not expose "long long" unless
__GNUC__ was defined.

Thanks for your time,
-Brad


---
Received: (at 184762-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 00:08:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 17:08:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bhzyj-0005Zt-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:08:01 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0A8E7DEB58; Wed,  7 Jul 2004 09:08:00 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:08:00 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#184762: libc6-dev exposes "long long" to non-GNU compilers
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:35:36 -0400,
Brad King wrote:
> > There is ISO/IEC C++ 14882:2003 these days.  This should be fixed 
> > (but I have not confirmed yet).
> > 
> > BTW, if compiler does not support 64bit type on 3

Bug#220624: marked as done (libc6-dev: breaks builds on 2.4 systems because depending on linux-kernel-headers which contain 2.5 headers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:09:31 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220624: libc6-dev: breaks builds on 2.4 systems because 
depending on linux-kernel-headers which contain 2.5 headers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2003 19:02:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 13 13:02:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from deimos.frii.net [216.17.128.193] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKMjQ-0001xF-00; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:02:16 -0600
Received: from fctype2.fc.hp.com (dsc02-ari-co-204-32-206-61.rasserver.net 
[204.32.206.61])
by deimos.frii.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hADJ2D0B041832;
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:02:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: by fctype2.fc.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 10396)
id 210063F30A; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:02:14 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alex Tsariounov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: breaks builds on 2.4 systems because depending on
 linux-kernel-headers which contain 2.5 headers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:02:14 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal


Seems that libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers which contain 2.5
kernel headers.  On a 2.4 system, and perhaps this also applies to
2.5/2.6 systems too, any source that includes  breaks
with compiler errors.  Attached below is some test code that makes use
of the public interface of query_module().  This builds on pre-ds1-*
libc6-dev systems, but breaks immediately on the current ds1-10 version.

Thanks,
Alex Tsariounov

---8< compile this:

#include 
#include 

main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct module_info mbuf;
size_t ret;

if (argc<2) {
printf("Usage: %s module_name\n", argv[0]);
exit(1);
}

if (query_module(argv[1], QM_INFO, &mbuf, sizeof(mbuf), &ret)) {
printf("Can't find module %s in kernel\n", argv[1]);
return 1;
}
else {
printf("Found %s loaded in kernel\n", argv[1]);
}
exit(0);
}

---8<--8<--


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux finback 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
di  linux-kernel-headers  2.5.999-test7-bk-8 Linux Kernel Headers for developme

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 220624-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 00:09:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 06 17:09:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bi00B-0005iI-00; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:09:31 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 05981DEB58; Wed,  7 Jul 2004 09:09:31 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:09:31 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alex Tsariounov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#220624: libc6-dev: breaks builds on 2.4 systems because 
depending on linux-kernel-headers which contain 2.5 headers
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-

Processed: severity of 248271 is important, reassign 248271 to nscd,libnss-ldap

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 248271 important
Bug#248271: nscd freezes when used with libnss-ldap on busy server.
Severity set to `important'.

> reassign 248271 nscd,libnss-ldap
Bug#248271: nscd freezes when used with libnss-ldap on busy server.
Bug reassigned from package `libnss-ldap' to `nscd,libnss-ldap'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#207354: marked as done (libc6: SEGV in glob64() on PowerPC)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 9 Jul 2004 01:30:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207354: libc6: SEGV in glob64() on PowerPC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2003 14:50:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 09:50:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rf8y-00088d-00; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:50:00 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8C800640B7; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:49:59 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: SEGV in glob64() on PowerPC
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:49:59 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PENISACCENT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: important

Got this while running kmix.

0x0eb4eb7c in glob64 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0  0x0eb4eb7c in glob64 () from /lib/libc.so.6

I'll restart kmix with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug and see if it
happens again.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux redwald 2.4.19-powerpc #1 Mon Sep 9 09:01:43 EDT 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 207354-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2004 06:30:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 08 23:30:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (localhost) [65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Biotp-0005Sd-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:30:21 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 52B6468C047; Fri,  9 Jul 2004 01:30:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 01:30:20 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#207354: libc6: SEGV in glob64() on PowerPC
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--ChQOR20MqfxkMJg9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:42:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:45:15 -0500,
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:31:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:49:59 -0500,
> > > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > Got this while running kmix.
> > > >=20
> > > > 0x0eb4eb7c in glob64 () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > > #0  0x0eb4eb7c in glob64 () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > >=20
> > > > I'll restart kmix with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/usr/lib/debug and see if =
it
> > > > happens again.
> > >=20
> > > Please show the test case or test code.
> >=20
> > Can't do that until I get a full backtrace.
> >=20
> > I'll just have to wait until it crashes again.
>=20
> Do you still have this problem with the latest glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13?
> There's no progress, so I guess it may be fixed from 2.3.2-3 

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 245563 fixed-upstream
Bug#245563: libc6: causes errors on linux-2.6.5 with PaX and 
CONFIG_PAX_NOVSYSCALL
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # gotom already solved this one in debian-glibc CVS
> tag 234691 pending
Bug#234691: mkisofs: SIGBUS on sparc32 + sparc64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 188677 glibc-doc
Bug#188677: libc6: Ionv doesn't accept NULL outbuf
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `glibc-doc'.

> retitle 188677 glibc-doc should describe iconv outbuf == NULL case
Bug#188677: libc6: Ionv doesn't accept NULL outbuf
Changed Bug title.

> retitle 190581 libc-0.3: nice() doesn't work
Bug#190581: nice() doesn't work
Changed Bug title.

> retitle 253030 sometimes ia64 does not set nscd's depends: libc6.1 field 
> correctly
Bug#253030: depends on libc6 on ia64
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#219145: libc6.1-dbg: should provide libc-dbg

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 219145 moreinfo
Bug#219145: libc6.1-dbg: should provide libc-dbg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#169758: libc6: muldiv should be important hwcap on sparc32 (and hwcap needs doc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 169758 woody
Bug#169758: libc6: muldiv should be important hwcap on sparc32 (and hwcap needs 
doc)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: woody

> tags 169758 wontfix
Bug#169758: libc6: muldiv should be important hwcap on sparc32 (and hwcap needs 
doc)
Tags were: woody patch
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 258956 libc6-udeb
Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1
Bug reassigned from package `network-console' to `libc6-udeb'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 259211 libc6
Bug#259211: apache segfault after upgrade from woody
Bug reassigned from package `apache' to `libc6'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.so.1 and libcrypt.so.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 258956 Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.so.1 and
Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1
Changed Bug title.

> libcrypt.so.1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.so.1 and libcrypt.so.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 258956 Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.so.1 and 
> libcrypt.so.1
Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.so.1 and
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 258647 confirmed
Bug#258647: libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#258789: marked as done (locales should be set up in init scripts instead of /etc/environment)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:36:51 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258789: locales should be set up in init scripts instead 
of /etc/environment
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2004 12:58:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 11 05:58:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.20.157] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bjduw-0007bs-00; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:58:54 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (pD9E3B5A3.dip.t-dialin.net [217.227.181.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id 
i6BCwo6c016183
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:51 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:58:46 +0200
From: Florian Effenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales should be set up in init scripts instead of /etc/environment
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: locales
Version: 2.2.5-11.5

The locales should be set up in init scripts instead of 
/etc/environment. Then the locale would be active for every user, not 
just for users logging in. This is especially useful for CGI or PHP 
scripts that would otherwise not use the locale.

---
Received: (at 258789-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 06:36:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 13 23:36:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkdNt-0003hZ-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:36:53 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 986BFDEB58; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:36:51 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:36:51 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Florian Effenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#258789: locales should be set up in init scripts instead of 
/etc/environment
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:31:47 +0200,
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > Then you have to make a complete new init script such as
> > /etc/init.d/locale and propose it because you know the advantage.
> 
> I'm no programmer, so I thought I sent it to bugs report and someone 
> could look at it. :)

So I'm sorry that I reject your proposal.  I close this bug.  Please
write the complete proposal before talking about your idea.

Regards,
-- gotom

Processed: Update and reassignment.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package easytag
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: easytag

> reassign 253248 libc6-dev
Bug#253248: easytag: Accented characters broken on OGGs.
Bug reassigned from package `easytag' to `libc6-dev'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Processed: Update and reassignment.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 253248 easytag
Bug#253248: easytag: Accented characters broken on OGGs.
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `easytag'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#224495: libc6: Regex Performance Kills OpenLDAP

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 224495 fixed-upstream
Bug#224495: libc6: Regex Performance Kills OpenLDAP
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#222055: marked as done (libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222055: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2003 12:28:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 25 06:28:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AOW4C-0003nF-00; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:48:52 -0600
Received: from newsamosa.debian.org [208.185.25.35] (mail)
by merkel.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AO5ev-0007Uc-00; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 18:37:01 -0700
Received: from node-4024482a.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net (Angel.zoy.org) [64.36.72.42] 
(foobar)
by newsamosa.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AO5eZ-0002BN-00; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:36:39 -0500
Received: by Angel.zoy.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D2ADDB872; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal


The following trivial program gives a compile warning using gcc-2.95 or
gcc272 on my debian testing system. gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3 are both fine.

#include 

int main (void)
{
return 0;
}

The warning I get is:

In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4,
 from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28,
 from /usr/include/signal.h:326,
 from foobar.c:1:
/usr/include/linux/compiler.h:17: warning: `__attribute_used__' redefined
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:195: warning: this is the location of the previous 
definition

I'm not sure if I should blame libc6-dev or linux-kernel-headers for this one.

Some additional system information not collected by reportbug:
gcc272 version 2.7.2.3-18
gcc-2.95 version 1:2.95.4-19

Hope this helps,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Angel 2.4.22 #1 Fri Aug 29 00:52:26 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  linux-kernel-headers  2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for developme

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 222055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:06:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 18:06:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldeg-0005JI-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:06:22 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F1713DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#222055: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_

Bug#221360: marked as done (upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221360: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2003 21:58:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 15:58:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl [213.154.224.1] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALrOa-0008AI-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:58:56 -0600
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (f52166.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.52.166])
by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAHLwpGl077258
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:51 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
hAHLwold005123;
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) id hAHLwoea005122;
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal

Hello,

I'm sending this bug report from my server, 'cause on my firewall
I can not install reportbug, because of the hosed libc install.

I just tried to do a apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest Sarge, and
somehow the libc went wrong (i don't have the exact details where things
went wrong). However i'm now left with:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg --install 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb 
(Reading database ... 14199 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2-9 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb) ...
These libraries were found in /usr/lib:
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1

A copy of glibc was found in an unexpected directory.
It is not safe to upgrade the C library in this situation;
please remove that copy of the C library and try again.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb 
(--install):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb

And I have no glue what to do next. I've copied the /lib/tls directory over from
my server, but I'm hesitating to delete the libraries in question.

grtz Miek


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elektron 2.6.0-test9-mm2 #25 Thu Nov 6 20:13:13 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 221360-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:18:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 18:18:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldq7-0005i0-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:18:11 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 975BBDEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  

Bug#220673: marked as done (libc6.1-dev: bits/sched.h has typo in CPU_ZERO macro)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:23:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220673: libc6.1-dev: bits/sched.h has typo in CPU_ZERO 
macro
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 02:03:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 13 20:03:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gsyprf3.external.hp.com [192.6.38.17] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKTIp-0008PS-00; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:03:15 -0600
Received: by gsyprf3.external.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C91832402C7; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:03:11 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6.1-dev: bits/sched.h has typo in CPU_ZERO macro
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:03:11 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.3.2-9
Severity: normal


Current bits/sched.h has:

/* Data structure to describe CPU mask.  */
typedef struct
{
  __cpu_mask __bits[__CPU_SETSIZE / __NCPUBITS];
} cpu_set_t;

/* Access functions for CPU masks.  */
# define __CPU_ZERO(cpusetp) \
  do { \
unsigned int __i;\
cpu_set *__arr = (cpusetp);  \
for (__i = 0; __i < sizeof (cpu_set) / sizeof (__cpu_mask); ++__i)   \
  __arr->__bits[__i] = 0;\
  } while (0)

Note that "cpu_set" is unknown type. Should be "cpu_set_t".
Unstable (.ds1-10 has the same bug).

grant


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux gsyprf3.external.hp.com 2.6.0-test9 #6 SMP Sun Nov 9 13:30:54 PST 
2003 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6.1-dev depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.3.2-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 220673-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:23:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 18:23:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldvb-00062H-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:23:51 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 928B6DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:23:50 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:23:50 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#220673: libc6.1-dev: bits/sched.h has typo in CPU_ZERO macro
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:03:11 -0800,
Grant Grundler wrote:
> Current bits/sched.h has:
> 
> /* Data structure to describe CPU mask.  */
> typedef struct
> {
>   __cpu_mask __bits[__CPU_SETSIZE / __NCPUBITS];
> } cpu_set_t;
> 
> /* Access functions for CPU masks.  */
> # define __CPU_ZERO(cpusetp) \
>   do { \
> unsigned int __i;

Bug#214096: marked as done (libc6: memory error in dlopen?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 11:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214096: libc6: memory error in dlopen?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2003 15:29:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 04 10:29:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru (gw.ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru) [194.190.187.220] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A5oLI-0003RM-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:29:12 -0500
Received: from forward.lab313 ([10.0.1.2])
by gw.ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id 
h94FT1wc006914
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 19:29:01 +0400
Received: from jk by forward.lab313 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A5oL6-0005FS-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:29:00 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"
From: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: memory error in dlopen?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.32
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:29:00 +0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by gw.ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru 
id h94FT1wc006914
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-8
Severity: normal

Hi!

Valgrind says a memory error in dlopen.

Example:
$ cat main.c

#include 

int main( int argc, char* argv[] )
{
void *handle;
handle =3D dlopen( argv[1], RTLD_LAZY );
dlclose( handle );
}

Valgrind's output:

$ valgrind --num-callers=3D50 ./a.out /usr/lib/libz.so
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Memcheck, a.k.a. Valgrind, a memory error detector for =
x86-linux.
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Copyright (C) 2002-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Sewar=
d.
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Using valgrind-20030725, a program supervision framewor=
k for x86-linux.
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Copyright (C) 2000-2003, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Sewar=
d.
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Estimated CPU clock rate is 1004 MHz
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D For more details, rerun with: -v
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value=
(s)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dat 0x40008ABA: _dl_relocate_object_internal (in /lib=
/ld-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4035BCF0: (within /lib/libc-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4000B115: _dl_catch_error_internal (in /lib/ld-=
2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4035BF5B: _dl_open (in /lib/libc-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40252FE7: (within /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4000B115: _dl_catch_error_internal (in /lib/ld-=
2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40253455: (within /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40253033: dlopen (in /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x804840B: main (in /home/jk/tmp/3/a.out)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4026ADBD: __libc_start_main (in /lib/libc-2.3.2=
.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x8048340: (within /home/jk/tmp/3/a.out)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value=
(s)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dat 0x40008B05: _dl_relocate_object_internal (in /lib=
/ld-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4035BCF0: (within /lib/libc-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4000B115: _dl_catch_error_internal (in /lib/ld-=
2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4035BF5B: _dl_open (in /lib/libc-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40252FE7: (within /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4000B115: _dl_catch_error_internal (in /lib/ld-=
2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40253455: (within /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x40253033: dlopen (in /lib/libdl-2.3.2.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x804840B: main (in /home/jk/tmp/3/a.out)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x4026ADBD: __libc_start_main (in /lib/libc-2.3.2=
.so)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3Dby 0x8048340: (within /home/jk/tmp/3/a.out)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D discard syms in /usr/lib/libz.so.1.1.4 due to munmap()
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 =
from 0)
=3D=3D18606=3D=3D malloc/free: in use at exit: 0 bytes in

Bug#214077: marked as done (libc6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:09:16 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214077: libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2003 11:29:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 04 06:29:39 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns2.sangy.com [212.177.1.102] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A5kbT-62-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 06:29:39 -0500
Received: from jherico.eulogika.net (unknown [62.123.72.254])
by ns2.sangy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C0371C084
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  4 Oct 2003 13:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.eulogika.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 13:30:58 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Lorenzo Viola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_55233721==.ALT"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

--=_55233721==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed



Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-7


Hi, I've two servers running debian testing a one BIG problem

These servers were up from 3 years.

A month ago I did a dselect-upgrade, and the libc6 was upgraded.
Since then I've this problem : randomly, after one-two day or after
some hours, the file :

/lib/libpthread-0.10.so ( linked from /lib/libpthread.so.0 )

goes to ZERO byte, and so many services and basic commands (like ls)
don't work anymore.

by now my libc6 version is : 2.3.2-7

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian 
prerelease)) #2 SMP mer ago 27 17:14:23 CEST 2003

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /bin/ls
 librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x4001a000)
 libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4002c000)
 libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4015a000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)


I've already tried reinstalling EVERYTHING from zero, but had no luck,
the problem still persists...

Looks like something creates a buffer overflow, but I can't understand
why this library becames of zero bytes.


sometimes instead of the ELF header I find this ASCII file :

/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library, so try that secondarily.  */
OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf32-i386)
GROUP ( /lib/libpthread.so.0 /usr/lib/libpthread_nonshared.a )

what could it mean ?

What could I check or how do I trace ? I didn't see nothing from the logs...
Is there a way to make the library create a trace, so to find out the problem ?

thank you and best regards

Computers are useless.They can only give you answers.Pablo Picasso(1881-1973)
WorkSite : http://www.eulogika.net - EulogiKa Software House 
--=_55233721==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"




Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-7


Hi, I've two servers running debian testing a one BIG
problem
These servers were up from 3 years.
A month ago I did a dselect-upgrade, and the libc6 was upgraded.
Since then I've this problem : randomly, after one-two day or after
some hours, the file :
/lib/libpthread-0.10.so ( linked from /lib/libpthread.so.0 )
goes to ZERO byte, and so many services and basic commands (like 
ls)
don't work anymore.
by now my libc6 version is : 2.3.2-7 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.22 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian
prerelease)) #2 SMP mer ago 27 17:14:23 CEST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /bin/ls
    librt.so.1 =>
/lib/librt.so.1 (0x4001a000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
(0x4002c000)
    libpthread.so.0 =>
/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4015a000)
    /lib/ld-linux.so.2 =>
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)

I've already tried reinstalling EVERYTHING from zero, but had no
luck,
the problem still persists...
Looks like something creates a buffer overflow, but I can't
understand
why this lib

Bug#213606: marked as done (ERROR: Load of file /usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so failed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:27:54 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#213606: ERROR: Load of file 
/usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2003 13:35:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 01 08:35:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nestor.kbinirsnb.be [193.190.234.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A4h8O-tm-00; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:35:16 -0500
Received: from bernie.kbinirsnb.be ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.20.4])
by nestor.kbinirsnb.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
h91DZE4F016331
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:35:14 +0200
Received: from pc20_114.kbinirsnb.be ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.20.114])
by bernie.kbinirsnb.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
h91DZE1g029297;
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:35:14 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Libert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ERROR: Load of file /usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so failed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:35:15 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: normal

When trying to link perl language with postgres, we get the following error 
message :
Postgres command :
create function plperl_call_handler() returns opaque
as '/usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so'
language 'C';

Error Message :
Error Type: ProgrammingError
Error Value: ERROR: Load of file /usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so failed: 
/lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol __libc_current_sigrtmin_private, version 
GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined 
in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

We suspect a problem with libc6 because it was working before an upgred of the 
package.

Regards.

Paul Libert
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux PC20_114 2.4.22-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 5 23:04:29 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 213606-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 03:27:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 20:27:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Blfrf-00014f-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:27:55 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 62647DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:27:54 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:27:54 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#213606: ERROR: Load of file /usr/lib/postgresql/lib/plperl.so 
failed
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:28:09 +0200,
Paul Libert wrote:
> Dear Mister Jacobowitz,
> 
> Thanks for your rapid answer,
> Following your suggestion, restarting Postgres seems to get rid of the

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 171851 glibc-doc
Bug#171851: libc6-dev: math.h does not declare trunc();
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `glibc-doc'.

> retitle 171851 info should describe about math function which is ISO C99 or 
> not
Bug#171851: libc6-dev: math.h does not declare trunc();
Changed Bug title.

> severity 171851 wishlist
Bug#171851: info should describe about math function which is ISO C99 or not
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> severity 167423 wishlist
Bug#167423: glibc-doc: sigrelse() is not documented
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> severity 248405 wishlist
Bug#248405: glibc-doc: daemon(3) undocumented
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> tags 227214 confirmed
Bug#227214: locales: LC_MONETARY wrong in pl_PL
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed

> tags 221566 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#221566: libc6: apt-get post-install script returns error exit status 139
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

> merge 220719 226345
Bug#220719: glibc-doc: wrong formatting for all pthread_* manpages
Bug#226345: glibc-doc: Incorrect and unsightly formatting in man pages
Merged 220719 226345.

> severity 226345 minor
Bug#226345: glibc-doc: Incorrect and unsightly formatting in man pages
Bug#220719: glibc-doc: wrong formatting for all pthread_* manpages
Severity set to `minor'.

> severity 220719 minor
Bug#220719: glibc-doc: wrong formatting for all pthread_* manpages
Bug#226345: glibc-doc: Incorrect and unsightly formatting in man pages
Severity set to `minor'.

> severity 220043 wishlist
Bug#220043: errno warning message could use improvement
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> severity 215923 minor
Bug#215923: libc6-dev: [sparc] fails to compile with bits/fenv.h and 
-pedantic-errors
Severity set to `minor'.

> tags 214077 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#214077: libc6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#211784: Not just nis...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 211784 dpkg
Bug#211784: libc6: service stop/start delay too short for nis
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `dpkg'.

> retitle 211784 dpkg: start-stop-daemon --stop does not check the actual 
> process termination in default
Bug#211784: libc6: service stop/start delay too short for nis
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 202023 wishlist
Bug#202023: glibc-doc: rcmd/rcmd_af undocumented
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 204735 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#204735: bug in new libc6 causes samba to crash
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 127980 libc0.3
Bug#127980: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NSS and static binaries]
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `libc0.3'.

> severity 128336 wishlist
Bug#128336: glibc-doc: timer_create() et al are not documented
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#113953: marked as done (libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are out of date)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:08:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are 
out of date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2001 11:27:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 30 06:27:47 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (green.zadka.com) [212.29.241.226] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15nel8-0002aO-00; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 06:27:47 -0500
Received: (qmail 5833 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2001 11:26:27 -
Date: 30 Sep 2001 11:26:27 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are out of 
date
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6
Version: 2.1.3-18
Severity: normal

the two zonefiles in question are out of date. Tel_Aviv should actually be 
eliminated and the Jerusalem file is no longer up to date (we have changed to 
winter time a week ægo and the clocks did not reflect that). from the zicfile, 
I quote the following (if you need I can attach you the full file)

# The Knesset Interior Committee has changed the dates for 2000 for
# the third time in just over a year and have set new dates for the
# years 2001-2004 as well.
#
# The official announcement for the start date of 2000 can be viewed at:
#
#   ftp://ftp.huji.ac.il/pub/tz/announcements/2000-start.ps.gz
#
# The official announcement for the end date of 2000 and the dates
# for the years 2001-2004 can be viewed at:
#
#   ftp://ftp.huji.ac.il/pub/tz/announcements/2000-2004.ps.gz

# Rule  NAMEFROMTO  TYPEIN  ON  AT  SAVELETTER/S
RuleZion2000only-   Apr 14  2:001:00D
RuleZion2000only-   Oct  6  1:000   S
RuleZion2001only-   Apr  9  1:001:00D
RuleZion2001only-   Sep 24  1:000   S
RuleZion2002only-   Mar 29  1:001:00D
RuleZion2002only-   Oct  7  1:000   S
RuleZion2003only-   Mar 28  1:001:00D
RuleZion2003only-   Oct  3  1:000   S
RuleZion2004only-   Apr  7  1:001:00D
RuleZion2004only-   Sep 22  1:000   S

# From Paul Eggert (2000-01-17):
# Here are guesses for rules after 2004.
# They are probably wrong, but they are more likely than no DST at all.
# Rule  NAMEFROMTO  TYPEIN  ON  AT  SAVELETTER/S
RuleZion2005max -   Apr  1  1:001:00D
RuleZion2005max -   Oct  1  1:000   S

# Zone  NAMEGMTOFF  RULES   FORMAT  [UNTIL]
ZoneAsia/Jerusalem  2:20:56 -   LMT 1880
2:20:40 -   JMT 1918# Jerusalem Mean Time?
2:00ZionI%sT



-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux green 2.2.19 #4 Thu Jul 19 10:15:33 IDT 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages libc6 depends on:
ii  ldso   1.9.11-9   The Linux dynamic linker, library and utilit

---
Received: (at 113953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:08:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:08:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BllBT-0007ZQ-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:08:43 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E3F2EDEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:08:42 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:08:42 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: libc6: Asia/Jerusalem and Asia/Tel_Aviv are not linked and are out 
of date
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 165881 EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug#165881: [hppa] EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK, breaks various programs
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 165881 glibc-doc
Bug#165881: EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `glibc-doc'.

> severity 165881 wishlist
Bug#165881: EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK should be described for hppa
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#162584: marked as done (memory leak in gethostbyname_r)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:27:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162584: memory leak in gethostbyname_r
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2002 12:33:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 27 07:33:52 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p5089a875.dip.t-dialin.net (server.localnet) [80.137.168.117] 
(mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17uuJX-0006vJ-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:33:47 -0500
Received: from joern by server.localnet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17uuJP-0007MK-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:33:39 +0200
Subject: memory leak in gethostbyname_r
From: "Joern Heissler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.49
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:33:38 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux server 2.2.20 #5 Mon Jul 8 21:10:05 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-4The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

I think I've found a memory leak in the function `gethostbyname_r'.

Example code:

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include 
#include 

void *lookup(void *arg)
{
char buf[8192];
struct hostent ret,*res;
int err;

gethostbyname_r((char *)arg, &ret, buf, 8192, &res, &err);

return NULL;
}

int main(void)
{
pthread_t tid;

do {
pthread_create(&tid, NULL, lookup, (void *) "www.debian.org");
} while (!pthread_join(tid, NULL));

return 0;
}

I compile the code like this:
gcc -Wall -O2 -o bug bug.c -lpthread

I've found 3 ways to avoid the memory leak in this code:
- compile it with -static
- comment out gethostbyname_r()
- don't create a new thread before calling gethostbyname_r() ->
for(;;) lookup("www.debian.org");

Every thread can leak memory only once, afaics.

Using dynamically allocated memory for `buf' and `ret' doesn't change
anything.

Regards
Joern Heissler



---
Received: (at 162584-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:27:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:27:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BllTc-00087A-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:27:28 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0A566DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:27:28 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:27:28 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joern Heissler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#162584: memory leak in gethostbyname_r
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

At Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:33:38 +0200,
Joern Heissler wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.2.5-14.3
> Severity: normal

> I think I've found a memory leak in the function `gethostbyname_r'.
> 
> Example code:
> 
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include 
> #include 
> 
> void *lookup(void *arg)
> {
>   char buf[8192];
>   struct hostent ret,*res;
>   int err;
> 
>   gethostbyname_r((char *)arg, &ret, buf, 8192, &res, &err);
> 
>   return NULL;
> }
> 
>

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 223394 moreinfo
Bug#223394: libc6: NPTL causes segfaults on forking(?) apps with 2.6.0-test11 
with exec_shield
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 256770 confirmed
Bug#256770: libc6.1-dev: multiple definitions in libc.a (lc-ctype.o), breaks 
Intel compiler
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#204805: marked as done (libc6.1-dev: new libc breaks intel C/C++ compiler)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 08:38:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 03:38:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp117-15.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net 
(freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au) [150.101.117.15] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19llir-0002iO-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:38:41 -0500
Received: from duraid by freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 19llii-0001xQ-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:38:32 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6.1-dev: new libc breaks intel C/C++ compiler
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.21
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:38:31 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

Previously, I could run ecc. Now, I get:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ecc
/usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x41): In function start':
: undefined reference to 
ain'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x31): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x32): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x40): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x41): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xd1): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xd2): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xf0): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xf1): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_end'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux freestyle 2.6.0-test2 #4 SMP Sat Aug 2 11:05:23 EST 2003 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6.1-dev depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 204805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:32:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:32:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BllYw-0008HT-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:32:59 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1A410DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROT

Bug#215981: marked as done (libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data for 2003/2004 summer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:36:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215981: libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data 
for 2003/2004 summer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2003 18:48:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 15 13:47:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from salzburg.nitnet.com.br (nat.cesarb.net) [200.157.92.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9qgG-0003QR-00; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:47:32 -0500
Received: from cesarb by flower.home.cesarb.net with local (Exim 4.22)
id 1A9qgD-0003xv-3K; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:47:29 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data for 2003/2004 summer
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:47:28 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE,PORN_4
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: normal

Brazilian daylight saving time start/finish dates are different every
year. Conectiva just released a patched glibc with this year dates[1].

In case you do not want to go chasing their patches, the announcement
has a link to the authoritative source[2], which says that it begins
2003/Oct/19 00:00 and finishes 2004/Feb/15 00:00.

(Yeah, too late to get a package out in testing before then. Already
gotten used to having to fudge timezones by hand every fscking time.)

[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/53889/
[2] https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/2003/D4844.htm

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux flower 2.4.20-preempt #1 Thu Dec 12 10:31:15 BRST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 215981-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:36:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:36:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BllcT-0008RP-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:36:37 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AEE1FDEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:36:36 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:36:36 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#215981: libc6: Please add Brazilian daylight saving data for 
2003/2004 summer
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
PORN_4 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:50:10 -0300,
Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > > In case you do not want to go chasing their patches, the announcement
> > > has a link to the authoritative source[2], which says that it begins
> > > 2003/Oct/19 00:00 and finishes 2004/Feb/15 00:00.
> > > 
> > > (Yeah, too late to get a package out in testing before then. Already
> > > got

Bug#259537: marked as done ('fr_FR.UTF-8' or any UTF-8 locale seems missing in X11 )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:42:57 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259537: Bug resolution (It was a configuration issue)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 11:09:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 15 04:09:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.23] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bl47B-0001Cl-00; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 04:09:25 -0700
Received: from mann.fr (ARennes-202-2-1-10.w193-253.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[193.253.48.10])
by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4627F1800151
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:08:36 +0200
From: Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 
Debian/1.4-5 StumbleUpon/1.87
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'fr_FR.UTF-8' or any UTF-8 locale seems missing in X11 
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="060102050207010205080005"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060102050207010205080005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13

In my /usr/XF86R6/lib/X11/locales directory I don't have fr_FR.UTF-8, 
nor do I have it in my alias file. This is however my C locale.

dpkg-reconfigure locales does what's its expected to do.

The UTF-8 problems only occur in emacs (stuff downloaded with zopeedit) 
and in the mozilla email client.

The problems occur in blackbox as well as kde, but not on console logins.

I can try
#export LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8
from konsole, but get the following after
# ls --help
Here is another interesting symptom. When I use konsole and type ls 
--help, I get this ::
Afficher les informations au sujet des FICHIERS (du répertoire
courant par défaut). Trier les entrées alphabétiquement si aucune
des options -cftuSUX ou --sort n'est utilisée.

I do have a en_US.UTF-8 in the /usr/XF86R6/lib/X11/locales directory, 
but the files still present the same symptoms in emacs, kate and konsole.

Here is one of the offending files (attached, I dont't know if you'll 
see it).

--060102050207010205080005
Content-Type: text/plain;
 
name="tmp-OMU31-infopol.webassociates.fr,municipalite,competences,Members,chris,test_doc.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 
filename="tmp-OMU31-infopol.webassociates.fr,municipalite,competences,Members,chris,test_doc.txt"


 
 Document test é

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Document test é
 


--060102050207010205080005--

---
Received: (at 259537-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:42:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:42:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bllib-0001bM-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:42:57 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 03D3DDEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:42:57 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:42:57 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christopher Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#259537: Bug resolution (It was a configuration issue)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushino