Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line missing contribution to the copyright file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2002 08:40:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 25 02:40:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk)
[195.92.249.252] (exim)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16pQ1q-0000DF-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 02:40:34 -0600
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5)
id 16pQ1p-00043B-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:40:33 +0000
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:40:33 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: missing contribution to the copyright file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-3
The `copyright' file does not include mention of the copyright of the
kernel headers which are included in the libc6-dev package by copying.
At least one of them claims to be covered by the GPL explicitly (acpi.h),
at least one is BSD-like (agp_backend.h), but most do not have explicit
headers.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 04:01:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 21:01:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfWHU-0006VS-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:01:08 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD23DEB58
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: missing contribution to the copyright file
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> The `copyright' file does not include mention of the copyright of the
> kernel headers which are included in the libc6-dev package by copying.
> At least one of them claims to be covered by the GPL explicitly (acpi.h),
> at least one is BSD-like (agp_backend.h), but most do not have explicit
> headers.
glibc 2.3.2.ds1-13 does not include any kernel information,
linux-kernel-headers package has it. It's separated from glibc
package. linux-kernel-headers package has
/usr/share/doc/linux-kernel-headers/copyright.
I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
