Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 08:38:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 03:38:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp117-15.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net
(freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au) [150.101.117.15]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19llir-0002iO-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:38:41 -0500
Received: from duraid by freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19llii-0001xQ-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:38:32 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6.1-dev: new libc breaks intel C/C++ compiler
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.21
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:38:31 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6.1-dev
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Previously, I could run ecc. Now, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ecc
/usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x41): In function start':
: undefined reference to
ain'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x31): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x32): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x40): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0x41): In function
_libc_csu_init':
: undefined reference to _init_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xd1): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xd2): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_end'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xf0): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_start'
/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(elf-init.oS)(.text+0xf1): In function
_libc_csu_fini':
: undefined reference to _fini_array_end'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: ia64
Kernel: Linux freestyle 2.6.0-test2 #4 SMP Sat Aug 2 11:05:23 EST 2003 ia64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6.1-dev depends on:
ii libc6.1 2.3.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 09:32:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 02:32:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BllYw-0008HT-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:32:59 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1A410DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
tags 256770 confirmed
thanks
Hi,
At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:42 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> #204805 is fixed now.
Thanks for your quick reply. I close it now.
> #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be
> with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It
> seems a mistake.
Yeah, that's right. I confirmed there're a lot of multiple symbol
definition... I have no idea why duplicate symbols are existed. It
needs investigation...
Regards,
-- gotom
